The thousand-question Spanish general knowledge database
- Francisco Buades-Sitjar 1
- Roger Boada 2
- Marc Guasch 2
- Pilar Ferré 2
- José Antonio Hinojosa 1
- Marc Brysbaert 3
- Jon Andoni Duñabeitia 1
- 1 Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain
-
2
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
info
- 3 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
ISSN: 1576-8597
Datum der Publikation: 2021
Ausgabe: 42
Nummer: 1
Seiten: 109-119
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental
Zusammenfassung
General knowledge questionnaires have been ubiquitously used to study a wide variety of phenomena, such as illusory truth, error correction and tip-of-the-tongue situations. However, their normings are highly restricted to the territory and the time periodthey in which they were obtained. This requires that new normings are obtained for each new territory in which they be used. Here, we present a new set of 1364 general knowledge questions normed for a Spanish population. The questions span a total of 37 different fields of knowledge and an extensive range of difficulty levels. They are formulated in a multiple-choice format, and pick rates for the correct answer as well as for the three incorrect response options are provided. We hope that a database of such size and flexibility will prove to be a useful research tool for the Spanish community.
Bibliographische Referenzen
- Adler, N., & Stewart, J. (2007). The MacArthur scale of subjective social status. MacArthur Research Network on SES & Health. Retrieved from http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/Research/Psychosocial/subjective.php.
- Altschul, I. (2012). Linking socioeconomic status to the academic achievement of Mexican American youth through parent involvement in education. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 3(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2012.2
- Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior research methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
- Bäckman, L., & Lipinska, B. (1993). Monitoring of general knowledge: Evidence for preservation in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 31(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(93)90157-U
- Brashier, N. M., Umanath, S., Cabeza, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency. Psychology and aging, 32(4), 331. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000156
- Chua, E. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2016). Knowing your heart and your mind: The relationships between metamemory and interoception. Consciousness and cognition, 45, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.015
- Coane, J. H., & Umanath, S. (2019). I don’t remember vs. I don’t know: Phenomenological states associated with retrieval failures. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.05.002
- Duñabeitia, J. A., Griffin, K. L., Martín, J. L., Oliva, M., Sámano, M. L., & Ivaz, L. (2016). The Spanish General Knowledge Norms. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01888
- Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098
- Jackson, A., & Greene, R. L. (2014). Impression formation of tests: Retrospective judgments of performance are higher when easier questions come first. Memory & cognition, 42(8), 1325–1332. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0439-5
- Jalbert, M., Newman, E., & Schwarz, N. (2019). Trivia claim norming: Methods report and data. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9975602
- Martín-Luengo, B., Zinchenko, O., Alekseeva, M., Y Shtyrov, Y. (2020). Russian norms for 500 general-knowledge questions. Front. Psychol. 11:02269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.545304
- Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J. (2013). Distributed cognition and memory research: History and current directions. Review of philosophy and psychology, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0131-x
- Murayama, K., & Kuhbandner, C. (2011). Money enhances memory consolidation–But only for boring material. Cognition, 119(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.001
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 19(3), 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90266-2
- Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Bernstein, D. M., Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2012). Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 969–974. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0
- Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797618774253
- Schoon, I., Jones, E., Cheng, H., & Maughan, B. (2012). Family hardship, family instability, and cognitive development. J Epidemiol Community Health, 66(8), 716–722. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2010.121228
- Schwartz, B. L. (2010). The effects of emotion on tip-of-the-tongue states. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.82
- Sitzman, D. M., Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2014). Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0344-3
- Sitzman, D. M., Rhodes, M. G., Tauber, S. K., & Liceralde, V. R. T. (2015). The role of prior knowledge in error correction for younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(4), 502–516. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13825585.2014.993302
- Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Rhodes, M. G., & Sitzman, D. M. (2013). General knowledge norms: Updated and expanded from the Nelson and Narens (1980) norms. Behavior research methods, 45(4), 1115–1143.
- Von Stumm, S., & Plomin, R. (2015). Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy through adolescence. Intelligence, 48, 30–36. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/s13428-012-0307-9
- Weinstein, Y., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). Retrospective bias in test performance: Providing easy items at the beginning of a test makes students believe they did better on it. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.3.366