Psicología social de las emocionesBreve panorama del giro visual y del giro digital

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ansari, A. (2015). Modern Romance. London: Allen Lane.
• Azevedo, R.T., Macaluso, E., Avenanti, A., Santangelo, V., Cazzato, V. y Agliot, S.M. (2013). Their pain is not our pain: brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals. Human Brain Mapping, 34(12), 3168-3181. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22133
• Baricco, A. (2019). The game. Barcelona: Anagrama.
• Barraket, J. y M.S. Henry-Waring (2008). ‘Getting It On(line): Sociological Perspectives on E-dating’. Journal of Sociology, 44(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783308089167
• Barthes, R. (2009). La cámara lúcida. Nota sobre la fotografía. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
• Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity.
• Beer, D. y R. Burrows (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations. Sociological Research Online, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1560
• Belli, S., Aceros, J. y Harré, R. (2015). “It's All Discursive!” Crossing Boundaries and Crossing Words with Rom Harré. Universitas Psychologica, 14(2), 771-784. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-2.iadc
• Belli, S. y Broncano, F. (2017). Trust as a Meta‐Emotion. Metaphilosophy, 48(4), 430-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12255
• Belli, S. y De Eugenio, G. (2014). Prácticas emocionales y procesos subjetivadores en la sociedad digital: el caso de los suicidios online. Quaderns de Psicología, 16(2), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1181
• Belli, S. y Díez, R. (2015). Una aproximación al papel de las emociones en la nueva ola de indignación global: La ocupación de espacios físicos y no-físicos. Sistema: Revista de ciencias sociales, 239, 83-98.
• Belli, S. e Íñiguez-Rueda, L. (2008). El estudio psicosocial de las emociones: Una revisión y discusión de la investigación actual. Psico, 39(2), 139-151.
• Belli, S., Harré, R. e Íñiguez-Rueda, L. (2010). What is love? Discourse about emotions in social Sciences. Human Affairs, 20, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-010-0026-8
• Belli, S., Harré, R. e Iñiguez, L. (2014). Narratives from call shop users: Emotional performance of velocity. Human Affairs, 24(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0221-1
• Benjamin, W. (1989). La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica. Buenos Aires: Editorial Taurus.
• Benwell, B. y Stokoe, E. (2010). Analysing identity in interaction: Contrasting discourse, genealogical, narrative and conversation analysis. En M. Wetherell y C.T. Mohanty, The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 82-103). London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200889.n6
• Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant suffering. Morality, Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489402
• Bootsma, R.J., Bakker, F.C., van Snippenberg, F.J. y Tdlohreg, C.W. (1992). The effects of anxiety on perceiving the reachability of passing objects. Ecological Psychology, 4, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.1992.10530790
• Buttny, R. y Ellis, D.G. (2007). Accounts of violence from Arabs and Israelis on Nightline. Discourse & Society 18(2), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073371
• Calero Vaquera, L.M. (2014). El discurso del WhatsApp: entre el Messenger y el SMS. Oralia, 17, 85-114.
• Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J. y Shneiderman, B. (2004). Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration. International journal of human-computer interaction, 17(3), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1703_3
• Charaudeau , P. (2006). Televisão e o 11 de setembro: alguns efeitos do imaginario. Logos 24: cinema, imagens e imaginario, 13(1). http://www.logos.uerj.br/PDFS/24/1_charaudeau.pdf
• Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The aestheticization of suffering on television. Visual Communication 5(3), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206068455
• Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The Ironic Spectator. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Christensen, B.A. (ed.). (2019). The second cognitive revolution: A tribute to Rom Harré. London: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26680-6
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
• Couch, D. y Liamputtong, P. (2008). Online Dating and Mating: The Use of the Internet to Meet Sexual Partners. Qualitative Health Research, 18(2), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307312832
• Crespo Suárez, E. (2018). Un enfoque social sobre las emociones. En J. Álvaro (ed.), La interacción social: escritos en homenaje a José Ramón Torregrosa (pp. 165-183). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS).
• Damasio, A. (2018). El extraño orden de las cosas. Barcelona: Planeta.
• Darics, E. (2012). Instant Messaging in work-based virtual teams: the analysis of non-verbal communication used for the contextualisation of transactional (Doctoral dissertation). Loughborough University.
• De Moor, J., Catney, P. y Doherty, B. (2019). What hampers ‘political’ action in environmental alternative action organizations? Exploring the scope for strategic agency under post-political conditions. Social Movement Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1708311
• Derks, D., Bos, A. y von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 379-388.
• Didi-Huberman. G. (2004). Imágenes pese a todo. Memoria visual del Holocausto. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Dierolf, K. (2013). The new psychology: discursive practices, not internal forces – an interview with Rom Harré. InterAction, 4(2), 78-85.
• Dresner, E. y Herring, C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: emoticons and Illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(4), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x
• Drury, J., Stott, C., Ball, R., Reicher, S., Neville, F., Bell, L. y Ryan, C. (2019). A social identity model of riot diffusion: From injustice to empowerment in the 2011 London riots. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 646-661. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2650
• Durand, G. (2000). Lo imaginario. Madrid: Ediciones del Bronce.
• Eagleton ,T. (2010). Los extranjeros. Por una ética de la solidaridad, Barcelona: Paidós.
• Ellis, J. (2001). Seeing Things. London: Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755604784
• Ellis, J. (2009). Mundane Witness. En P. Frosh y A. Pinchevski, Media Witnessing. Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 73-88). London: Macmillan Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235762_4
• Evans, D. (2003). Emotion. A very short introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804617.001.0001
• Fardella, C. y Carvajal Muñoz, F. (2018). Los estudios sociales de la práctica y la práctica como unidad de estudio. Psicoperspectivas, 17(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol17-Issue1-fulltext-1241
• Fernández Villanueva, C. (2018). De la interacción social a la subjetividad. En J. Álvaro (ed.), La interacción social: escritos en homenaje a José Ramón Torregrosa (pp. 217-233). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS).
• Fernández Villanueva, C. y Revilla Castro, J.C. (2016). Seres “humanos” o seres “lejanos”: imágenes de violencia real e implicación/distanciamiento con las víctimas. Communication & Society, 29(3), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.103-118
• Fernández Villanueva, C., Revilla Castro, J.C. y Domínguez, R. (2015). Psicología social de la violencia. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Fernández Villanueva, C., Revilla, J.C. y Domínguez Bilbao, R. (2011a). Identificación y especularidad. Una reconstrucción a partir del discurso. Comunicación y Sociedad 24(1), 7-33.
• Fernández Villanueva, C., Revilla, J.C. y Domínguez Bilbao, R. (2011b). Las emociones que suscita la violencia en televisión. Comunicar 36, XVIII, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.3916/C36-2011-02-10
• Fernández-Villanueva, C., Revilla, J., González, R. y Lozano Maneiro, B. (2013). Violencia en la televisión. ¿Desagradable, interesante o morbosa? Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, 582-598. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-991
• Freedberg, D. (1992). El poder de las imágenes, estudios sobre la historia y la teoría de la respuesta. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
• Frosh, P. (2011). Phatic morality: Television and proper distance International. Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877911403248
• Frosh, P. y Pinchevski, A. (2009). Media Witnessing. Testimony in the age of mass communication. London: Macmillan Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235762
• Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266
• Gibbs, J.L., Ellison, N.B. y Lai, C.H. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377091
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Goldie, P. (2012). The Mess Inside: Narrative, Emotion, and the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230730.001.0001
• Goluboff, S. (2015). Text to Sex: The Impact of Cell Phones on Hooking Up and Sexuality on Campus. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915603759
• Gould, D. (2019). On (not) knowing what is to be done (in 17 affective registers). Emotions and Society, 1(1), 15-43. https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15580836411814
• Greco, M. y Stenner, P. (2013). Emotions: a social science reader. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881393
• Guedes Gondim, S.M. y Álvaro Estramiana, J.L. (2010). Naturaleza y cultura en el estudio de las emociones. Revista Española De Sociología, 13, 31-47.
• Güney, Ü. (2010). ‘We see our people suffering’: the war, the mass media and the reproduction of Muslim identity among youth. Media, War & Conflict, 3(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635210360081
• Hadlington, L. y Scase, M.O. (2018). End-user frustrations and failures in digital technology: exploring the role of Fear of Missing Out, Internet addiction and personality. Heliyon, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00872
• Hareli, S. y Parkinson, B. (2008). What´s social about social emotions? Journal for The theory of social behavior, 38, 131-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00363.x
• Harré, R. (1986). The social construction of emotions, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Harré, R. y Parrot, W.G. (1996). The emotions. Social, cultural and biological dimensions. London: Sage Publications.
• Harré, R. y Van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Malden: Blackwell.
• Hartmann, T. (2011). Not so moral. Moral responses to media entertainment? Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000028
• Hobbs, M., Owen, S. y Gerber, L. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316662718
• Hobbs, W., Burke, M., Christakis, N., y Fowler, J. (2016). Online social integration is associated with reduced mortality risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(46), 12980-12984. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605554113
• Hochschild, A.R. (2016). Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
• Hochschild, A. (2019). Emotions and society. Emotions and Society, 1(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15580836411805
• Holmes, M., Manning, N. y Wettergren, Å. (2019). Into the 21st century. Emotions and Society, 1(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15580836411797
• Huesmann, L. R. (2012). The contagion of violence: The extent, the processes, and the outcomes. In D. M. Patel, R. M. Taylor (eds.) & Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of the National Academies, Social and economic costs of violence: Workshop summary (p. 63–69). The National Academies Press.
• Ibáñez, T. (2003). El giro lingüístico. En L. Íñiguez, Análisis del discurso: Manual para las Ciencias sociales (pp.21-42). Barcelona: EDIUOC.
• Íñiguez, L. (2003). Análisis del discurso: Manual para las ciencias sociales. Barcelona: EDIUOC.
• Jacobsen, M.H. (2019). Liquid-modern emotions: exploring Zygmunt Bauman’s contribution to the sociology of emotions. Emotions and Society, 1(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15580836411878
• Jokinen, J.P.P., 2015. Emotional user experience: traits, events, and states. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 76, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.006
• Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future internet, 4(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4010083
• Kavanagh, B. (2010). A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English non-verbal online communication: The use of emoticons in weblogs. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(3), 65-80.
• Kyriakidou, M. (2017). Remembering global disasters and the construction of cosmopolitan memory. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12142
• Lim, Y.K., Donaldson, J., Jung, H., Kunz, B., Royer, D., Ramalingam, S., Thirumaran, S. y Stolterman, E. (2008). Emotional experience and interaction design. En C. Peter y R. Beale (eds.), Affect and emotion in human-computer interaction: From theory to applications (pp. 116-129). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85099-1_10
• Maltby, S. (2016). Remembering the Falklands War: subjectivity and identification. International Journal of Communication, 10, 642-659. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55660-8
• Markman, K.M. y Oshima, S. (2007). Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse. In Association of Internet Researchers annual conference (Vol. 8).
• McLuhan, M. (1964). The medium is the message. En Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (pp. 23-35). New York: Signet.
• Meredith, J. y Stokoe, E. (2014). Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘chat’ with spoken interaction. Discourse & communication, 8(2), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510815
• Mick, D.G. y Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1086/209531
• Morriss-Suzuki, T. (2005). The Past within Us: Media, Memory, History. London: Verso.
• Muntanyola-Saura, D. y Belli, S. (2014). Emociones y música en movimiento. Discursos cruzados en una compañía de danza. Trans. Revista Transcultural de Música, 18, 1-27.
• Nagy, P. y Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
• Nass, C. y Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
• Newett, L., Churchill, B. y Robards, B. (2018). Forming connections in the digital era: Tinder, a new tool in young Australian intimate life. Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317728584
• Ovejero, A. (2000). Emotions: Reflections from a socioconstructionist perspective. Psicothema, 12, 16-24.
• Paasonen, S. (2015). As networks fail: affect, technology, and the notion of the user. Television & New Media 16(8), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414552906
• Poter, W.J. (2004). The 11 myths of media violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Rabinow, P. y Sullivan, W.M. (1979). Interpretative Social Science: A reader. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340343
• Rainie, L. y Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001
• Reeves, B. y Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Reinhardt, M., Edwards, H. y Duganne, E. (eds.) (2007). Beautiful Suffering: Photography and the Traffic in Pain. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Revilla, J.C., Fernández Villanueva, C. y Domínguez, R. (2011). La mirada moral sobre la violencia en televisión. Un análisis de los discursos de los espectadores. Revista internacional de sociología, 68(3), 679-698. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.09.07
• Roberts, R.C. (2013). Emotions in the moral life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061469
• Saariluoma, P. y Jokinen, J. (2014). Emotional dimensions of user experience? A user psychological analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.858460
• Sampietro, A. (2016). Emoticonos y emojis: Análisis de su historia, difusión y uso en la comunicación digital actual (Tesis doctoral). Universitat de València.
• Sampietro, A. (2019). Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
• Silverstone, R. (2006). Media and morality. On the rise of the mediapolis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Skey, M., Kyriakidou, M., Mccurdy P. y Uldam, J. (2016). Staging and Engaging With Media Events: A Study of the 2014 Eurovision Song Contest. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3381-3399.
• Skovholt, K., Grønning, A. y Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 780-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063
• Slater, D. (2013). Love in the Time of Algorithms: What Technology Does to Meeting and Mating. New York: Penguin Group.
• Sliwinski, S. (2009). The Aesthetics of Human Rights. Culture, Theory and Critique, 50(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735780802696336
• Slovic, P., Zionts, D., Woods, A.K., Goodman, R. y Jinks, D. (2013). Psychic numbing and mass atrocity. En E. Shafir (ed.), The Behavioral Foundations of Policy (pp. 126-144). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cbm.13
• Sontag, S. (2003). Ante el dolor de los demás. Madrid: Alfaguara.
• Sprecher, S. (2009). Relationship initiation and formation on the Internet. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6-8), 761-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224350
• Taquet, M., Quoidbach, J., de Montjoye, Y., Desseilles, M. y Gross, J. (2016). Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(35), 9769-9773. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519998113
• Thüring, M. y Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396674
• Turkle, S. (2004). Whither psychoanalysis in computer culture? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.21.1.16
• Turner, J.H. y Stets, J.E. (2004). The sociology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819612
• Unz, D., Schwab, F. y Winterhoff-Spurk, P. (2008). TV News – The Daily Horror. Emotional Effects of Violent Television News. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.4.141
• Vandergriff, I. (2013). Emotive communication online: a contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal Pragmatics, 51, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008
• Weiner, B. (2005). Social motivation, justice and the moral emotions: an attributional approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615749
• Wilson, A. (1993). A pragmatic device in electronic communication. Journal Pragmatics, 19(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90098-A
• Yus, F. (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3), 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414
• Zickuhr, K. (2013). Who’s Not Online and Why. Pew Research Center. Internet & Technology.