¿Nos formamos los pediatras para publicar artículos médicos?Encuesta piloto

  1. M.A. Zafra Anta
  2. Beatriz Flores Antón
  3. M. J. Rivero Martín
  4. J. Barrio Torres
  5. Pedro Pérez Segura
  6. E. Oros Milián
Journal:
Acta pediátrica española

ISSN: 0001-6640

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 72

Issue: 11

Pages: 370-373

Type: Article

More publications in: Acta pediátrica española

Abstract

Introduction: Writing and publishing require a methodology, organization, and systematics that all pediatricians should know. Objective: To evaluate the level of training on biomedical publications among pediatricians and other medical specialists who work in pediatrics in our area, as well as their personal experience in publishing. Material and methods: An opportunity survey with 13 closed questions and another mixed question on training, experience, and motivation to publish. Sample: physicians attending to a lecture about "How to publish articles" from a course aimed to pediatricians, family physicians, pediatrics residents (MIR-pediatrics), and residents in family medicine (MIR-family physicians). Descriptive statistics: SPSS version 15. Results: The target population was 53 physicians. Thirty four (64.1%) fulfilled the questionnaire. Only 13 (38.2%) from the people who answered were trained in publication techniques (through courses and seminars): pediatricians 9 out of 21 (42.8%), MIR-pediatrics 2 out of 6 (33.3%), MIR-family physicians 2 out of 7 (28.6%). Experience: a) published at least one article in the last 5 years: pediatricians 18 (85.7%); b) more than 5 articles: pediatricians 5 (23.8%), MIR-pediatrics 2 (33%, both <6 articles), MIR-family physicians 5. Motivation: publishing was experienced as "too difficult" for 5 (20% of those who had published). The main reason for publishing was personal curriculum (94.1% of 34). Discussion: This pilot study offers a glance at reality and let us know the necessity to train on how to write biomedical article. This work is a proposal to extend this kind of studies to other districts or sanitary areas. A considerable percentage of people didn't remark publishing as emotionally positive, instead, they found it "too difficult". Conclusions: In our sample, a lack of training in scientific writing has been proven. We recommend enhancing tools such as these surveys, in order to discover, promote, and guide through training skills to teach biomedical writing.