A comparative study of small area estimators

  1. Santamaría Arana, Laureano
  2. Molina Peralta, Isabel
  3. Morales González, Domingo
Journal:
Sort: Statistics and Operations Research Transactions

ISSN: 1696-2281

Year of publication: 2004

Volume: 28

Issue: 2

Pages: 215-230

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Sort: Statistics and Operations Research Transactions

Abstract

It is known that direct-survey estimators of small area parameters, calculated with the data from the given small area, often present large mean squared errors because of small sample sizes in the small areas. Model-based estimators borrow strength from other related areas to avoid this problem. How small should domain sample sizes be to recommend the use of model-based estimators? How robust small area estimators are with respect to the rate sample size/number of domains? To give answers or recommendations about the questions above, a Monte Carlo simulation experiment is carried out. In this simulation study, model-based estimators for small areas are compared with some standard design-based estimators. The simulation study starts with the construction of an artificial population data file, imitating a census file of an Statistical Office. A stratified random design is used to draw samples from the artificial population. Small area estimators of the mean of a continuous variable are calculated for all small areas and compared by using different performance measures. The evolution of this performance measures is studied when increasing the number of small areas, which means to decrease their sizes.

Bibliographic References

  • Battesse, G. E., Harter, R. M. and Fuller, W. A. (1988). An error-component model for prediction of county crop areas using survey and satellite data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 28-36.
  • Drew, J. D., Singh, M. P. and Choudhry, G. H. (1982). Evaluation of small area techniques for the Canadian Labour Force Survey.Survey Methodology, 8, 17-47.
  • Ghosh, M. and Rao, J. N. K. (1994). Small area estimation: an appraisal.Statistical Science, 9, 55-93.
  • Henderson, C. R. (1953). Estimation of variance and covariance components.Biometrics, 9, 226-252.
  • Prasad, N. G. N. and Rao, J. N. K. (1990). The estimation of themean squared error of small-area estimators.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 163-171.
  • Rao, J. N. K. and Choudhry, G. H. (1995). Small area estimation: overview and empirical study.Business Survey Methods(Cox, Binder, Chinnappa, Christianson, Colledge, Kott, eds.). John Wiley, 527-542.
  • Särndal, C., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. (1992).Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer-Verlag.
  • Searle, S. R., Casella, G. and McCullogh, C. E. (1992).Variance Components. John Wiley. New York.
  • Valliant, R., Dorfman, A. H. and Royall, R. M. (2000).Finite Population Sampling and Inference. A Prediction Approach. John Wiley. New York.
Data source: Dialnet