Estructura de las redes de colaboración científica entre las universidades españolas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Batagelj, V.; Mrvar, A. (1997). Pajek. Program package for large networks analysis. // XVII Sunbelt Social Networks Conference San Diego, February,13-16 http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/sunbelt.97/pajek.htm (26-12-2007)
• Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does collaborative research greater epistemic authority?. // Scientometrics. 60:3 (August 2004) 399-408.
• Börner, K., Chen, C.; Boyack, K. (2003). Visualizing Know-ledge Domains. // Annual Review of Information Science & Technology. 37 (2003) 179-355.
• Camí, J. (2004). Dinámica de intercitación y cocitación entre las universidades españolas: análisis bibliométrico de los documentos citados producidos en las universidades y de los documentos citantes en el período 1994-2000, a partir de las bases de datos National Citation Report del ISI. Madrid: Dirección General de Universidades, 2004.
• Cruz Castro, L.; Sanz Menéndez, L.; Romero, M. (2004). Convergencia y divergencia en las políticas de ciencia y tecnología de los gobiernos regionales. Madrid: CSIC, 2004. http://www.iesam.csic.es/doctrab2/dt-0402.pdf
• European Commission (2003). Third european report on science and technology indicators 2003: towards a knowledge-based economy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003.
• Everett, M. G.; Borgatti, S.P. (1999) Peripheries of cohesive subsets. // Social Networks. 21:4 (October 2000) 397-407.
• Freeman, L. C. (2000). Visualizing Social Networks. // Jour-nal of Social Structure. 1:1 (February 2000) 1-15.
• Gómez, I.; et al. (2005) Regionalization of science and technology data in Spain. // Research Evaluation. 14:2 (August 2005) 137-148.
• Gómez, I.; et al. (2007) Structure and research performance of spanish universities. Proceeedings of ISSI 2007: 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Madrid: CINDOC, 2007. 335-345.
• Heffner, A. G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and sub-authorship collaboration in four disciplines. // Scientometrics. 3:1 (January 1981) 5-12.
• Kamada T.; Kawai S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing gene-ral undirected graphs. // Information Processing Letter. 31:1 (April 1989) 7-15.
• Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. // Scientometrics. 31:1 (September 1994) 31-43.
• Kraut, R. E.; Galegher, J.; Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and task is scientific research collaboration. // Human-Computer interaction. 3:1 (1987-1988) 31:58.
• Leydesdorff, L.; Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in Information Science: Extending ACA to the Web Environment. // Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 57:12 (October 2006) 1616-1628.
• Laudel, G. (2002) What do we measure by co-authorships?. // Research Evaluation. 11:1 (April 2002) 3-15.
• Liang, L.; Zhu, L. (2002). Major factors affecting China ́s interregional research collaboration: regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity. // Scientome-trics. 55:2 (August 2002) 287-316.
• Melin, G; Persson (1996). Studying collaboration using co-authorships. // Scientometrics. 36:3 (October 1996) 363-377.
• Moya Anegón, F.; et al. (2004). Análisis de la excelencia científica en la investigación universitaria española (1998-2002). Madrid: Dirección General de Universidades, 2004.
• Moya Anegón F.; et. al. (2005). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española (1990-2004). Madrid: Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología, 2005.
• Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98:2 (Ja-nuary 2001) 404-409.
• Okubo, Y.; Zitt, M. (2004). Searching for research integration across Europe: a closer look at international and inter-regional collaboration in France. // Science and Public Policy. 31:3 (June2004) 213-226.
• Otte, E.; Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network anaysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information Sciences. // Journal of Information Science. 28:6 (December 2002) 441:453.
• Persson, O.; Glänzel, W.; Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: the role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. // Scientometrics. 60:3 (August 2004) 421-432.
• Rovira Pato, Ll. (2006). Análisis de la actividad interdisciplinar en base a los documentos ISI de las universidades españolas: estudio de las aplicaciones para su óptima evaluación. Madrid: Dirección General de Universidades, 2006.
• Sanz Menéndez, L. (1997). Estado, ciencia y tecnología en España: 1939-1997. Madrid: Alianza Universidad, 1997.
• Smith, D.; Katz, J. S. (2002). Collaborative approaches to research. HEFCE fundamental review of research policy and funding. A joint project with the Higher Education Policy Unit (HEPU), University of Leeds and the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) University of Sussex. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf (2008-05-14).
• Vargas-Quesada, B.; Moya Anegón, F. (2007). Visualizing the structure of science. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
• Tichy, N. M.; Tushman, M. L.; Fombrun, Ch. (1979). Social network analysis for organization. // The Academy of Management Review. 4:4 (October 1979) 507-519.
• Wagner, C. S.; Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. // Research Policy. 34:10, (December 2005) 1608-1618.
• Zitt, M.; Bassecoulard, E.; Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation. Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. // Scientometrics. 47:3 (March 2000) 627-657.