Una aproximación al análisis de Redes egocéntricas de colaboración interinstitucional

  1. Ovalle Perandones, María Antonia
  2. Olmeda Gómez, Carlos
  3. Perianes Rodríguez, Antonio
Journal:
Redes: Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales

ISSN: 1579-0185

Year of publication: 2010

Issue Title: Las redes sociales en la ciencia

Issue: 19

Pages: 168-190

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/REDES.404 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Redes: Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Is it possible to establish the influence network of institutions involved in scientific production? Do you share the nodes of the influence network sectorial characterics? What is the advantage to deepen on egocentric collaborative networks with coauthorship data? These three research questions have been those that have guided the development of this article and to answer the first part of the paper analyzes the phenomenon of collaboration as measured by coauthorship are discussed in which one or what are the contributions of network analysis egocentric done before a complete social network analysis. We propose the use of egocentric networks for a better understanding of scientific collaboration and the influence network among institutions with scientific coauthorship in Chemistry area in Spain.

Bibliographic References

  • Bonacich P. (1972) "Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification". Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2 (1), pp. 113-120.
  • Bordons M; Gómez I. (2000). "Collaboration Networks in Science". En: The Web of Knowledge. A festschrift in honor to Eugene Garfield. New Jersey: Asis, pp. 197-213
  • Börner K; Chen C; Boyack KW. (2003) "Visualizing knowledge domains". Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, pp. 179-225.
  • Börner K; Sanyal S; Vespignani A. (2007) "Network Science". Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, pp. 537-607.
  • Brandes U. (2008) "On variants of shortest-path between centrality and their generic computation". Social Networks, 30, pp. 136-145.
  • Brin S; Page L. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. [En línea]. Disponible en: <http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf> [Fecha de consulta: 21-10-2010].
  • Carrasco JA; Miller EJ. (2006) "Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach". Transportation, 33 (5), pp. 463-480.
  • Cea D'Ancona MA. (2002)Análisis multivariable. Teoría y práctica en la investigación social. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
  • Chinchilla Rodríguez Z. Análisis del dominio científico español: 1995 - 2002 (ISI, Web of Science). [Tesis Doctoral]. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2004.
  • Coleman JS. (1988) "Social capital in the creation of human capital". American Journal Sociology, 94 (Supplement), pp. S95-S120.
  • Costa J. (1998)La esquemática: visualizar la información. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Cronin B. (2001) "Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?". Journal of American Society for Information Science and Tecnology, 52 (7), pp. 558-569.
  • Eades P. (1984) "A heuristic for graph drawing". Congressus Numeratium, 42, pp. 149-160.
  • Fenn DJ; Porter MA; McDonald M; Williams S; Johnson NF; Jones NS. 2009. Dynamic communitites in multichannel data: An application to the foreign exchange market during the 2007-2008 credit crisis. [En línea]. Disponible en: <http://arXiv:0811.3988v3> [Fecha de consulta: 21-10-2010].
  • Friedkin NE. (1998)A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gómez I; Fernández MT; Bordons M; Morillo F. Proyecto de obtención de indicadores de producción científica y tecnológica de España (1996-2001). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 2004.
  • Granovetter MS. (1973) "The strength of weak ties". American Journal Sociology,78 (6), pp. 1360-1380.
  • Hanneman RA. (2005)Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California.
  • Hara N; Solomon P; Kim SL; Sonnenwald DH. (2003) "An emerging view of scientific collaboration: scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration". Journal of American Society for Information Science and Tecnology, 54 (10), pp. 952-965.
  • Katz JS; Martin BR. (1997) "What is research collaboration?". Research Policy, 26, pp. 1-18.
  • Kleinberg JM. 1998. Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. [En línea]. Disponible en: <http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf> [Fecha de consulta: 12-10-2010].
  • Laudel G. (2002) "What do we measure by co-authorships?". Research Evaluation,11 (1), pp. 3-15.
  • Luukkonen T; Persson O; Sivertsen G. (1992) "Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration". Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17 (1), pp. 101-126.
  • Mattessich PW; Monsey BR. (1992)Collaboration: What makes it work. A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. Lafond, St. Paul: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
  • Melin G; Persson O. (1996) "Studying research collaboraion using co-authorships". Scientometrics, 36 (3), pp. 363-377.
  • Milojevic S. (2010) "Modes of collaboration in modern science: beyond power laws and preferential attachment". Journal of American Society for Information Science and Tecnology, 61 (7), pp. 1410-1423.
  • Moed HF. (2005)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Holanda: Springer.
  • Molina JL. (2005) "El estudio de las redes personales: contribuciones, métodos y perspectivas". EMPIRIA.Revita de Metodología en Ciencias Sociales, 10, pp. 71-105.
  • Molina JL; Muñoz JM; Domenech M. Redes de publicaciones científicas: una análisis de la estructura de coautorías. Sunbelt XXI Budapest 25-28 abril 2001: 2001,
  • Moya Anegón F; Chinchilla Rodríguez Z. (2004)Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española. (ISI, Web of Science, 1998-2002). Madrid: FECYT.
  • Moya Anegón F; Chinchilla Rodríguez Z. (2005)Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española - 2004. Madrid: FECYT.
  • Moya Anegón F; Vargas Quesada B; Chinchilla Rodríguez Z; Corera Álvarez E; Herrero Solana V; Muñoz Fernández F. (2005) "Domain analysis and information retrieval through the construction of heliocentric maps based on ISI-JCR category cocitation". Information Processing & Management, 41, pp. 1520-1533.
  • Moya Anegón F (dir.); Chinchilla Rodríguez Z; Corera Álvarez E; Gómez-Crisóstomo R; González Molina A; Muñoz Fernández F, [et al.] . (2007)Indicadores bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española (1990-2004). Madrid: FECYT.
  • Nooy W; Mrvar A; Batagelj V. (2004)Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Estructural Analysis in the Social Sciences, 27)
  • Olmeda Gómez C; Perianes Rodríguez A; Ovalle Perandones MA; Moya Anegón F. (2008) "Comparative analysis of university-government-enterprise co-authorship networks in three scientific domains in the region of Madrid". Information Research,13 (3), pp. Paper 352
  • Perianes Rodríguez A; Olmeda Gómez C; Moya Anegón F. (2010)Redes de colaboración científica. Valencia: Tirant Online.
  • Russell JM; Madera-Jaramillo MJ; Ainsworth S. (2009) "El análisis de redes en el estudio de la colaboración científica". REDES- Revista Hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 17 (2),
  • Smith D; Katz JS. Collaboratie Approaches to Research. 2000.
  • Subramanyam K. (1983) "Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review". Journal of Information Science, 6, pp. 33-38.
  • Vargas Quesada B; Moya Anegón F; Chinchilla Rodríguez Z; Corera Álvarez E; Guerrero Bote V. (2008) "Evolución de la estructura científica española: ISI Web of Science 1990-2005". El Profesional de la Información, 17 (1), pp. 22-37.
  • Wasserman S; Faust K. (1994)Social Network Analysis. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences 8
  • Wellman B. (1988). "Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance". En: Wellman B and Berkowit SD. Social structures: a network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, pp. 19-61
  • White HC. (2001) "Author-centered bibliometrics through CAMEOs: Characterizations automatically made and edited online". Scientometrics, 51 (3), pp. 607-637.
  • White HC; McCain KW. (1997) "Visualization of literatures". Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, pp. 99-168.
  • Zitt M; Bassecoulard E; Okubo Y. (2000) "Shadows of the past in international cooperation: collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science". Scientometrics, 47 (3), pp. 627-657.
Data source: Dialnet