El parto es nuestroEl impacto de una asociación de usuarias en la reforma del sistema obstétrico de España

  1. Villarmea, Stella 3
  2. Olza, Ibone 1
  3. Recio, Adela 2
  1. 1 Equipo Actúa
  2. 2 Cuerpo Superior de Estadísticos del Estado
  3. 3 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Dilemata

ISSN: 1989-7022

Année de publication: 2015

Titre de la publication: Cuando los sujetos se embarazan: Filosofía y Maternidad

Número: 18

Pages: 157-183

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Dilemata

Résumé

This paper analyzes the contribution of the civil society association Birth is Ours (El Parto es Nuestro) to the reform of the obstetric health system in Spain from its origins in 2003 until the present years. The aim is to show to which extent the user’s association Birth is Ours has contributed to deliberative democracy within the medical arena in Spain. To understand the kind of debate produced by childbirth activism in Spain, Marcelo Dascal’s theory of controversies will be used. In relation to this theory, this article presents three epistemological hypotheses. First hypothesis: the civil society association Birth is Ours has contributed to deliberative democracy in Spain and Europe by deeply engaging in the obstetric debate as to achieve the move from phase 1 – an initial phase of technical discussion between 2001 and 2004 – to phase 2 – an intermediate phase of technical dispute between 2004 and 2007 –, and to phase 3 – the actual state of technical controversy from 2007 until now. Second hypothesis: around childbirth there is nowadays a debate that we classify as controversy, following Dascalian terms. Many examples of obstetric controversies relate to when and why particular medical interventions are or are not necessary. Third hypothesis: linguistic innovation is one of the factors that turn a discussion or a dispute into a controversy. The article concludes that the civil society association Birth is Ours has: 1) given visibility to the situation of childbirth in Spain; 2) opened a controversy around obstetric issues; 3) helped to implement very important legal, social and political changes in its context. Consequently, Birth is Ours has played, and continues playing, a critical role in assessing obstetric issues. It has then assumed the shared social responsibility that is peculiar of what Bunge calls an “integral democracy” (Bunge, 2013).

Références bibliographiques

  • Beck, C. T. (2004), Post-traumatic stress disorder due to childbirth: The aftermath, Nursing Research, 53 (4): 216-224
  • Bunge, M. (2013), Filosofía política. Solidaridad, cooperación y “Democracia Integral”, Barcelona, Gedisa
  • Dascal, M. (1998a), The study of controversies and the theory and history of science, Science in Context, 11 (2): 147-154
  • Dascal, M. (1998b), “Types of polemics and types of polemical moves”, en Cmejrkova, S., Hoffmanova, J., Mallerova, O. y Svetla, J. (eds.), Dialogue Analysis VI. Proceedings of the 16th Conference (Praga 1996), vol. I, Tubinga, Max Niemeyer, 15-33
  • Dascal, M. (1995), Epistemología, controversias y pragmática, Isegoría, 12: 8-43
  • Fahy, K. (2002), Reflecting on practice to theorise empowerment for women: Using Foucault’s concepts, Australian Journal of Midwifery: Professional Journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated, 15 (1): 5-13
  • Ferguson, T. y e-Patients Scholars Working Group (2007), The White Paper, e-patients: How they can help us heal health care, descargado desde http://e-patients.net/e-Patients_White_Paper.pdf
  • Gutmann, A., y Thompson, P. (2002), Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, Princeton University Press
  • Johanson, R., Newburn, M., y Macfarlane, A. (2002), Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 324 (7342): 892-895
  • Lipson, J. G. (1981), Cesarean support groups: Mutual help and education, Women and Health, 6 (3-4): 27-39
  • Lobel, M., y Deluca, R. S. (2007), Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: Review and analysis of their causes and implications, Social Science & Medicine (1982), 64 (11): 2272-2284, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.028
  • Medina, J. (2013), The epistemology of resistance, Oxford, Oxford University Press
  • Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo (2007), Estrategia de atención al parto normal en el Sistema Nacional de Salud, Madrid, Ministerio Sanidad y Consumo
  • Olza Fernández, I. (2013), PTSD and obstetric violence, Midwifery Today with International Midwife, 105 (105): 48-9, 68
  • Olza Fernández, I. (2010), El trastorno de estrés postraumático como secuela obstétrica, Cuadernos de medicina psicosomática y psiquiatría de enlace, 23 (96): 35-41
  • Olza Fernández, I. (2003), Repercusiones psicológicas y sociales del nacimiento por cesárea, Revista Trabajo Social y Salud, 45 (Julio): 221-230
  • Perez D’gregorio, R. (2010), Obstetric violence: A new legal term introduced in Venezuela, International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 111 (3): 201-202, doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.002
  • Romano, A. M., Gerber, H., y Andrews, D. (2010), Social media, power, and the future of VBAC, The Journal of Perinatal Education, 19 (3): 43-52, doi:10.1624/105812410X514431
  • Sawyer, A., y Ayers, S. (2009), Post-traumatic growth in women after childbirth, Psychology & Health, 24(4): 457-471. doi:10.1080/08870440701864520
  • Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (SEGO) (2003), Protocolo de asistencia al parto normal, Madrid, SEGO
  • Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (SEGO) (2008), Recomendaciones sobre la asistencia al parto, Madrid, SEGO
  • Thomson, G., y Downe, S. (2008), Widening the trauma discourse: The link between childbirth and experiences of abuse, Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 29(4): 268-273, doi:10.1080/01674820802545453
  • Tully, K. P., y Ball, H. L. (2013), Misrecognition of need: Women’s experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 85: 103-111, doi:10.1016/j. socscimed.2013.02.039; 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.039
  • Villarmea, S. (2012), Innovación conceptual y activismo: A propósito del parto y del nacimiento normal, Revista Ob Stare, 20 (primavera): 11-17
  • Villarmea, S. (2013), Conceptual change and emancipatory practices: An approach from Wittgenstein’s On Certainty, Annales UMCS (University Marie Curie Sklodowska), Sectio I Philosophia-Sociologia, 1: 7-24
  • Villarmea, S. (2015), “Normatividad y praxis en el uso emancipatorio del lenguaje: Aproximación desde la certeza en Wittgenstein”, en Pérez Chico, D. y Mayoral, J. V. (eds.), Wittgenstein y Sobre la Certeza: Nuevas perspectivas, México, Plaza y Valdés Editores: (en prensa)
  • Villarmea, S. (2009), “Rethinking the origin: Birth and human value”, en Yan, J. y Schrader, D. (eds.), Creating a global dialogue on value inquiry, Nueva York, Edwin Mellen Press: 311-329
  • Villarmea, S. y Fernández Guillén, F. (2012), “Sujetos de pleno derecho. El nacimiento como tema filosófico”, en Pérez Sedeño, E. e Ibáñez Martín, R. (eds.), Cuerpos y diferencias, México, Plaza y Valdés Editores: 103-127
  • Villarmea, S. y Fernández Guillén, F. (2012), Fully entitled subjects: Birth as a philosophical topic, Ontology Studies, 11 (2011): 211-230.
  • El Parto es Nuestro, www.elpartoesnuestro.es International Cesarean Awareness Network (ICAN), http://www.ican-online.org/, consultado 30 julio
  • 2013 “La Carta de Madrid”, http://aesmatronas.com/descargas/LA_CARTA_DE_MADRID_ESPANOL.pdf Fernández del Castillo, I., “Por qué parir en España es traumático”, El Mundo, 2 mayo 2004 Bollaín, I., “Por tu propio bien”, 2004, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxpVqK8oNi0, consultado
  • 30 julio 2013 Campoy, F., “Los dolores del parto”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddty4WuUaYU, consultado
  • 30 julio 2013 Ortiz, M. y Masllorens, A., “De parto”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls8UT2WbGkg, consultado
  • 30 julio 2013 Montero, R., “El desastre de parir”, El País, 13 agosto 2006, http://elpais.com/diario/2006/08/13/
  • eps/1155450419_850215.html, consultado 30 julio 2013 Sánchez-Mellado, L., “El Parto es mío”, El País Semanal, 25 marzo 2007, http://elpais.com/
  • diario/2007/03/25/eps/, consultado 30 julio 2013 European Network Childbirth Associations (ENCA), http://www.enca.info/, consultado 30 julio 2013 Escalera, A., “Matronas y ginecólogos abren una guerra por la asistencia a los partos”, Diario
  • Sur, 22 abril 2010, http://www.diariosur.es/v/20100422/malaga/matronas-ginecologos-abrenguerra-20100422.html, consultado 11 mayo 2014
La source de données: Dialnet