El uso de Twitter en los XVII y XVIII Encuentros Internacionales de Investigación en Cuidados

  1. Ovalle-Perandones, María-Antonia 1
  2. Navas-Martín, Miguel-Ángel 2
  1. 1 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ths8210

  2. 2 Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados de Salud (Investén)
Journal:
Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

ISSN: 1695-6141

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 14

Issue: 4

Pages: 143-149

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/EGLOBAL.14.4.233741 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

More publications in: Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose a roadmap to analyze the use of the Twitter social network during the days when a conference is held. The main reason is the lack of practice to perform this task in the Spanish context, against the habit of doing at international conferences, with special emphasis in Health Sciences. With the Opileak technology, all messages were monitored on the social network Twitter during four days of the International Nursing Research Conferences, organized by Carlos III Healthcare Institute’s, Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-ISCIII). The process was made when the conferences were closed in the years 2013 and 2014, both had their own hashtags: #inves13 and # inves14. The results show that users tend to retweet more over time than original tweets; the main days of the conference have also the highest activity on the social network; users take different roles, being some good informers or well-informed users; the words used are a tribute to the cities where the conferences are held, the theme of the conferences and their international character. This type of analysis should perform by the organization of any meeting to discover the event impact on a communication channel 2.0 

Bibliographic References

  • 1. Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis (WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07).New York: ACM; 2007. Disponible en: http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/_file_directory_/papers/369.pdf. [Consultado el 29 de mayo de 2015]
  • 2. Mena Muñoz S. Medición del tiempo de efectividad de los tuits. Interés y vida de la información en la era de las redes sociales. In: Vicente Mariño V, González Hortigüela T, Pacheco Rueda M, editors. Investigar la Comunicación hoy. Revisión de políticas científicas y aportaciones metodológicas: Simposio Internacional sobre Política Científica en Comunicación. 2013. p. 173-84. Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/4228715.pdf. [Consultado el 1 de junio de 2015]
  • 3. Marqués Sánchez P, González Pérez ME, Agra Varela Y, Vega Núñez J, Pinto Carral A, Quiroga Sánchez E. El análisis de las redes sociales. Un método para la mejora de la seguridad en las organizaciones sanitarias. Revista Española de Salud Pública 2013;87 (3): 209-19.
  • 4. Moreno-Torres Sánchez R. El acceso a la literatura gris: actas de congresos y tesis doctorales. Boletín de Anabad 1986; 36 (4): 671-96.
  • 5. Escudero Sánchez M, Fernández Cáceres JL, Malgosa Sanahuja JM. Retransmisiones y congresos en Internet. Contenidos y Aspectos Legales en la Sociedad de la Información (CALSI), Valencia (Spain), 22-23 October. 2002. Disponible en: http://eprints.rclis.org/4314/ [Consultado el 5 de junio de 2015]
  • 6. Goff DA, Van Den Bergh D. Twitter: A tool to improve healthcare professionals' awareness of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship. South African Medical Journal 2015; 105 (5): 427-30.
  • 7. Purita G. OBS Social 2015: análisis de las tendencias de uso y participación en las redes sociales a nivel mundial en España. Online Business School; 2015. Disponible en: http://recursos.anuncios.com/files/681/25.pdf [Consultado el 20 de mayo de 2015]
  • 8. Reinhardt W, Ebner M, Beham G, Costa C. How people are using Twitter during conferences. In: Hornung-Prähauser V, Luckmann M, editors. Proceedings of 5th EduMedia conference: Creativity and innovation competencies on the Web.Salzburg: 2009. p. 145-56.Disponible en: http://www.salzburgresearch.at/wpcontent/uploads/2010/12/Tagungsband_EduMedia_2009_04_01_formatiert_v15.pdf [Consultado el 3 de junio de 2015]
  • 9. Twitter Inc. Centro de Ayuda de Twitter | Bienvenido a Twitter. 2015. Disponible: http://www.twitter.com [Consultado el 1 de junio de 2015]
  • 10. Djuricich AM, Zee-Cheng JE. Live tweeting in medicine: 'Tweeting the meeting'. International Review of Psychiatry 2015; 27 (2): 133-9.
  • 11. McKendrick DR, Cumming GP, Lee AJ. Increased use of Twitter at a medical conference: a report and a review of the educational opportunities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;16 (4).
  • 12. Chaudhry A, Glod‚ M, Gillman M, Miller RS. Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. Journal of Oncology Practice 2012; 8 (3): 173-8.
  • 13. Roland D, May N, Body R, Carley S, Littley MD. Are you a SCEPTIC? SoCial mEdia Precision & uTility In Conferences. Emergency Medicine Journal 2014; 32 (5): 412-3.
  • 14. Neill A, Cronin JJ, Brannigan D, O'Sullivan R, Cadogan M. The impact of social media on a major international Emergency Medicine Conference. Emergency Medicine Journal 2014; 31 (5): 401-4.
  • 15. Desai T, Shariff A, Shariff A, Kats M, Fang X, Christiano C, et al. Tweeting the meeting: an in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at Kidney Week 2011. PLOS one 2012; 7 (7): e40253.
  • 16. Micieli R, MIcieli JA. Twitter as a tool for ophthalmologists. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d'Ophtalmologie 2012; 47 (5): 410-3.
  • 17. Cochran A, Kao LS, Gusani NJ, Suliburk JW, Nwomeh BC. Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress. Journal of Surgical Research 2015; 190 (1): 36-40.
  • 18. Logghe H, Maa J, Schwartz J. Twitter usage at Clinical Congress rises markedly over two years. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 2013; 98 (2): 22-4.
  • 19. Hawkins CM, Duszak R, Rawson JV. Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2014; 11 (4): 387-90.
  • 20. Anderson G, Gleeson S, Rissel C, Wen LM, Bedford K. Twitter tweets and twaddle: Twittering at AHPA's National Health Promotion Conference. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 2014; 25 (2): 143-6.
  • 21. Award NI, Cocc C. Use of Twitter at a major national pharmacy conference. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 2015; 72 (1): 65-9.
  • 22. Matta R, Doiron C, Leveridge MJ. The dramatic increase in social media in Urology. Journal of Urology 2014; 192 (2): 494-8.
  • 23. Wilkinson SE, Basto MY, Perovic G, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG. The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: Analytics and trends from eight international meetings. BJU International 2015; 115 (5): 839-46.
  • 24. Ebner M, Reinhardt W. Social networking in scientific conferences Twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science 2.0 for TEL at the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL'09). 2009.
  • 25. Weller K, Dr”ge E, Puschmann C. Citation analysis in Twitter: approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on. Making Sense of Microposts (MSM2011). 2011.
  • 26. Letierce J, Passant A, Decker S, Breslin JG. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. Web Science Conference, April 26-27.Raleigh: 2010.
  • 27. Jussila J, Huhtamäki J, Kärkkäinnen H, Still K. Information visualization of Twitter data for co-organizing conferences. Proceedings 17th International Academic MindTrek Conference on International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media, October 1-4.Tampere: ACM; 2013. p. 139-45.
  • 28. Traver Vall‚s P, Cobarsí-Morales J. El uso de Twitter en los congresos profesionales de información y documentación: Estudio de caso. Revista General de Información y Documentación 2012; 22: 349-65.
  • 29. Opeliak. 2015. Disponible en: http://www.opileak.es [Consultado el 15 de mayo de 2015]
  • 30. Olmeda Gómez C. Visualización de Información. El Profesional de la Información 2014; 23 (3): 213-9.
  • 31. Kleinberg JM. Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. ACM-SIAM Symposium on discrete algorithms 1998. Disponible en: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf [Consultado el 04 de junio de 2015
  • 32. Kleinberg JM. Hubs, Authorities, and Communities. ACM Computing Surveys 1999; 31 (4): 3.
  • 33. Perra N, Fortunato S. Spectral centrality measures in complex networks. Physical Review E 2008; 78 (36107): 36107-1-36107-10.
  • 34. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
  • 35. Mishori R, Levy B, Donvan B. Twitter Use at a Family Medicine Conference. Family Medicine 2014; 46 (8): 608-14. http://www.opileak.es/ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf
  • 36. Del Val E, Rebollo M, Botti V. Does the type of event influence how user interactions evolve on Twitter? PLOS one 2015; 10 (5): e0124
Data source: Dialnet