Revisión sobre el tratamiento de las secuelas lingüísticas en pacientes intervenidos con mapeo de lenguaje intraoperatorio

  1. José Luis ACEVEDO-PÉREZ
Aldizkaria:
Revista ORL

ISSN: 2444-7986,  2444-7986

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Alea: 10

Alea: 3

Orrialdeak: 207-212

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista ORL

Laburpena

Introduction and Objectives: The approach of speech therapy in patients with tumors of the central nervous system intervened by intraoperative language mapping technique begins in the postsurgical phase in an early manner, rehabilitating the possible linguistic outcomes. The speech therapist bases his intervention based on the information collected in the clinical history and in the assessments made by phoniatrics in each phase. In addition, it considers the different therapeutic approaches, the objectives and intervention strategies to propose the most adapted treatment to the needs of the patient. Patients operated by intraoperative mapping technique present few linguistic deficits compared to those operated by traditional techniques. The most frequent outcomes affect production presenting varied pictures of anomie with semantic, phonological and phonetic paraphasias, perseverations, slowness and speech blocks. The usual treatment of these patients is presented following the pragmatic and cognitive-neurolinguistic approach. Method: Narrative Review. Results: The treatment is personalized and of shorter duration. Conclusions: It is important to know this technique in depth and to theoretically base the intervention in order to approach the patient with better results.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • 1. Acevedo Pérez, JL, Sánchez-López A, NúñezNúñez C. Logopedia en paciente con mapeo cortical intraoperatorio. Rev. Logop Fon Audiol. 2017;37(1):1-52.
  • 2. Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraintinduced language therapy for individuals with Stroke-Induced aphasia. JSLHR. 2008;51(5):128299.
  • 3. Robert, E. Linguistic procedure in ‘awake neurosurgery’. Stem-Spraak en Taalpathologie. 2005;13:5666.
  • 4. Ardila A. Las Afasias. Guadalajara: La Pandora; 2006. Recurso electrónico disponible en https:// aalfredoardila.wordpress.com/articles-papers/. [Citado el 11/11/2018].
  • 5. Portellano JA. Introducción a la Neuropsicología. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
  • 6. Duffau H. Brain Mapping. From Neural Basis of Cognition to Surgical Applications. Austria: SpringerWienNewYork; 2011.
  • 7. Moreno Rosset C. Evaluación Psicológica. Teoría y Prácticas. 2ºed. Madrid: Sanz y Torres; 2005.
  • 8. Ilmberger J, Ruge M, Kreth, F, Briegel J, Reulen H, Tonn JC. Intraoperative mapping of language functions: a longitudinal neurolinguistic analysis. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:583-92.
  • 9. Benedet MJ. Acercamiento neurolingüístico a las alteraciones del lenguaje. Vol., I y II. Madrid: Eos; 2006.
  • 10. Coronas Puig-Pallarols M, Basil Almirall C. Comunicación aumentativa y alternativa para personas con afasia. Rev. Logop Fon Audiol. 2013;33:126135.
  • 11. Peña-Casanova J. Manual de logopedia.4ªEd, Barcelona: Masson; 2014.
  • 12. Mazaux JM, Delair MF. Rehabilitación cognitiva y del lenguaje en adultos. EMC – Tratado de medicina. 2014;18,3:1-5.
  • 13. Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. 3ªed, Australia: Elsevier; 2008.
  • 14. Cuetos F. Neurociencia del Lenguaje: Bases neurológicas e implicaciones clínicas. Madrid: Panamericana; 2012.
  • 15. Helm-Estabrooks N, Albert ML. Manual de la afasia y de terapia de la afasia. 2º ed. Madrid: Panamericana; 2005.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet