Fossilization of English as an L2 non-native constructions at the syntax-discourse interface in Romance L1 speakers

  1. Marciano Escutia López 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista Nebrija de Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de Lenguas

ISSN: 1699-6569

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 15

Número: 30

Páginas: 118-147

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.26378/RNLAEL1530408 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Nebrija de Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de Lenguas

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este estudio examina y compara la producción del inglés como lengua extranjera de dos grupos de hablantes con respecto a algunas manifestaciones de la expresión del sujeto en el discurso. El primero es de 12 alumnos españoles avanzados de inglés como lengua extranjera al final de su licenciatura en Filología Inglesa, y el segundo de 9 hablantes adultos de lenguas románicas residentes en países de habla inglesa durante décadas. Se intenta comprobar la hipótesis de que la inversión verbo-sujeto con verbos inacusativos y la omisión de los sujetos pronominales identificados por el discurso en la lengua nativa constituyen elementos de fosilización si su pervivencia se mantiene en el grupo segundo, a pesar de su larga y abundante exposición a la L2 y su frecuente interacción en la misma.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Kasey, T. and Pérez-Leroux, A.-T., 1998. Second language acquisition of Spanish null subjects. In Flynn, S., Matohardjono, G., O'Neil, W. (eds.), The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 161-185.
  • Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou & M. Everaert., 2003. The Unaccusativity Puzzle. Oxford University Press.
  • Balcom, P., 1997. Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research 13, 1, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897670080531
  • Barbosa, P., 1995. Null Subjects. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, Mass.
  • Barbosa, P., 2000. Clitics: A Window into the Null Subject Property. In Costa, J., eds.), Portuguese Syntax: Comparative Studies. New York: Oxford Press, pp. 31-93.
  • Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A., 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language Linguist Theory 25: 657–689.
  • Burman, D., Bitan, T., Booth, J.R., 2008. Sex Differences in Neural Processing of Language Among Children. Neuropsychologia: 46, 5, pp. 1349-1362.
  • Domínguez, L. & Arche, M. J., 2014. Subject inversion in non-native Spanish. Lingua 145, pp. 243-265.
  • Erteschik‐Shir, N., 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellis, R., 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Escutia, M., 1998. Variability and non-variability in the English L2 acquisition of an adult Spanish speaker. Perspectives on Spanish Linguistics, 2. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, pp. 25– 43.
  • Escutia, M. 1999. Age and that-trace effects. Estudios ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 7, pp. 109-118.
  • Escutia, M., 2002. Universal Grammar, transfer and variability: a case study. Estudios ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 10, 2002, pp. 67-86.
  • Escutia, M., 2002. First language effect on Spanish learners’ production of indirect interrogative clauses. Círculo 10. 1-5. Available at http://ww.ucm.es/info/circulo/no10/index.htm
  • Escutia, M., 2008. Transfer and Universal Grammar in Unaccusative Constructions Errors. Miscelánea, 37, pp. 23-38.
  • Escutia, M., 2010. El uso de "se" con verbos inacusativos por estudiantes avanzados de español como lengua extranjera: transferencia y restructuración. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 23, pp. 129-152
  • Escutia, M., 2013. Expletives and unaccusative predicates in L2A. Higher Education of Social science 2, pp. 1-14.
  • Escutia, M., 2016. L2 Spanish preverbal ‘se’ in analysis and production data. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, pp. 30-63
  • Fernández Soriano, O., 1989. Strong pronouns in null-subject languages and the avoid pronoun principle. MIT working papers in linguistics 11, pp. 228–239.
  • Filiaci, F., Sorace A. & Carreiras, M., 2014. Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(7), pp. 825–843.
  • Gass, S., 1979. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning 29, pp. 327–344.
  • Gass, S., 1982. From theory to practice. In Hines, M. & Rutherford, W., eds.) On TESOL '81: 129–139. Washington DC: TESOL.
  • Gass, S., 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  • Gass S. and Lee, J., 2007. Second Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Volume 29, 2, pp. 329-335
  • Han, Z. -H., 2004. Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
  • Han, Z.-H., 2006. Fossilization: Can grammaticality judgment be a reliable source of evidence?. In Han Z.-H. & Odlin, T., eds.) Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition, pp. 56– 82. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
  • Han, Z.-H., 2009. Interlanguage and fossilization: Towards an analytic model. In Cook, V. & Wei, L., eds.) Contemporary applied linguistics I: Language teaching and learning. London: Continuum, pp. 137-162.
  • Han, Z.-H., 2013. Forty years later: Updating the Fossilization Hypothesis. Language Teaching 2, pp. 133 ­-171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000511.
  • Han, Z.-H. & Lew, W.M., 2012. Acquisitional complexity: What defies complete acquisition in SLA. In Szmrecsanyi, B., & Kortmann, B., eds.), Linguistic Complexity in Interlanguage Varieties, L2 Varieties, and Contact Languages. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 192-217.
  • Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S., 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, pp. 263– 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
  • Hertel, T.J., 2003. “Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research 19, pp. 273- 304.
  • Hilles, S., 1986. Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter. Second Language Research 2, pp. 33-52.
  • Johnson J.S. and Newport E.L., 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21 (1), pp. 60-99.
  • Kato, Mary A., 1999. Strong and weak pronominals and the null subject parameter. Probus 11(1. pp. 1–38.
  • Labov, W., 1969. The Logic of Non-Standard English. Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics, 22, pp. 1-31.
  • Lardiere, D., 1998. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end state grammar. Second Language Research, 14 (4), pp. 359–375.
  • Lardiere, D., 2007. Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. New York: Routledge
  • Liceras, J. M., 1988. Syntax and stylistics: more on the pro-drop parameter. In Pankhurst, J. Studies on Language Acquisition, 7. De Gruyter Mouton
  • Liceras, J. M., 1989. On some properties of the pro-drop parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In Gass, S. & Schachter, J., eds.), Language accquisition: A linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–133.
  • Liceras, J. M., & Díaz, L., 1999. Topic-drop versus pro-drop: null subjects and pronominal subjects in the Spanish L2 of Chinese, English, French, German and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research, 15(1), pp. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899678128123
  • Lightbown, P. M., 1985. Great Expectations: Second-Language Acquisition Research and Classroom Teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 2, pp. 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.2.173
  • Lightbown, P. M., 2000. Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 21, pp. 431-462.
  • Lightbown, P. M., 2003. SLA research in the classroom/SLA research for the classroom. Language Learning Journal 27, pp. 4-14.
  • Long, M. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in second language acquisition 12, pp. 251–85.
  • Long, M. H., 2003. Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H., eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 487–535.
  • Lozano, C., 2003. Universal Grammar and focus constraints: The acquisition of pronouns and word order in non-native Spanish. University of Essex: Unpublished PhD dissertation.
  • Lozano, C., 2006a. “Focus and split intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research 22(2): 145–187. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr264oa.
  • Lozano, C., 2006b. The development of the syntax-discourse interface: Greek learners of Spanish. In: Torrens, V. & Escobar, L., eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 371-399.
  • Lozano, C., 2009. Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface: Evidence from the CEDEL2 corpus. In Leung, Y., Snape, N. & Sharwood-Smith, M., eds) Representational Deficits in Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 127–166.
  • Lozano, C. & Mendikoetxea, A., 2013. Corpus and experimental data: Subjects in second language research. In Granger, S., Gilquin G. & Meunier, F., eds), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead. Corpora and Language in Use. Proceedings 1, Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, pp. 313-323.
  • Mendikoetxea, A. & Lozano, C., 2018. From Corpora to Experiments: Methodological Triangulation in the Study of Word Order at the Interfaces in Adult Late Bilinguals (L2 learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47(02), pp. 411-430.
  • Montrul, S. and Bowles, M., 2009. Back to basics: Differential Object Marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3, pp. 363–383.
  • Montrul, S. & Rodríguez-Louro, C., 2006. Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter: A look at the discourse-pragmatics distribution of null and overt subjects by L2 learners of Spanish. In Torrens, V. & Escobar, L., eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 401–418.
  • Moskovsky C. and Ratcheva, S., 2014. L2 Fossilization: A Competence or a Performance Phenomenon. The Open Communication Journal 8, 9-17.
  • Newport, E., 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 14, pp. 11–28.
  • Oshita, H., 2001. The unaccusative trap in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(02), pp. 279 – 304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101002078.
  • Pérez-Leroux, A., Glass, W. L., 1999. Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research, 15(2), pp. 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899676722648
  • Phinney, M., 1987. The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E., eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel: pp. 221-38.
  • Pladevall, E., 2013. Adult L2 Spanish development of syntactic and discourse subject properties in an instructional setting. RAEL (Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada) 12, pp. 111-129.
  • Saville-Troike M., 2006. Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge Introductions to Language and Linguistics.
  • Selinker, L., 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, pp. 209–231.
  • Singleton, D., 1989. Language acquisition: the age factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Singleton, D., 1995. Introduction: a critical look at the critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In Singleton, D. and Lengyel, Z., eds), The age factor in second language acquisition, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters: pp. 1–29.
  • Sorace, A., 2000. Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16 (2), pp. 93–102.
  • Sorace, A., 2003. Near-nativeness. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 130–151. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Sorace, A., 2004. Native Language Attrition and Developmental Instability at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Data, Interpretations and Methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(02), pp. 143 – 145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001543
  • Sorace, A., 2005. Selective optionality in language development in Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social. In Leonie Cornips and Karen P. Corrigan (eds.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265, pp. 55–80.
  • Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L., 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339810
  • Tarone, E., 1983. On the Variability of Interlanguage Systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 2, pp. 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.142
  • Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F., 2004. First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 3, pp. 257-277.
  • Trahey, M. and L. White., 1993. Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 181–204.
  • Trenkic, D., 2009. Accounting for patterns of article omissions and substitutions in second language production. In M. P. García Mayo & R. Hawkins (eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 115–143.
  • White, L., 1985. The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 35, pp. 47-62.
  • White, L., 1990. The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1, pp. 337–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0104_2
  • White, L., 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zobl, H., 1980. The formal and developmental selectivity of L1 influence on L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770. 1980.tb00150.x