Elevación transcrestal mínimamente invasiva versus osteótomosRevisión bibliográfica
- Esteban Montoya Villanea
- Jaime Jiménez
- Javier Núñez
- Carlos Gómez Álvarez
- Víctor Gómez Pérez
- Gustavo Manuel Rodríguez Vivoni
ISSN: 1135-2949
Ano de publicación: 2020
Número: 328
Páxinas: 66-79
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Gaceta dental: Industria y profesiones
Resumo
The main objective of this investigation is to do an update of the litera-ture and review the different techniques of transcrestal elevation, doing a comparison between the reference technique and the technique with osteotomes. A manual search was performed, together with an electronic search in PUBMED, Medline and Cochrane with the following MesH terms: «dental implants» AND «survival rate» AND «sinus lift» AND «osteotome technique» OR «transcrestal elevation» AND «minimally invasive sinus lift» OR «atraumatic elevation» OR «inactive drills» OR «hydraulic system» OR «SCA» OR «osstem» AND maxilla. After the total reading of the 48 articles, 20 of them did not offer useful information or presented exclusion criteria, so the articles definitively chosen were 25. After finalizing the past investigation it is concluded that the techniques that came after the osteotome technique obtain almost the same results but it resulted in a less invasive procedure for the patient, at the same time these new techniques allow the surgeons to perform elevations with a smaller crystal bone size with the crestal approach. At the same time further studies are needed.