La perspectiva tecnosocial feminista como antídoto para la misoginia online

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alldred, P. y Biglia, B. (2015). Gender-Related Violence and Young People: An Overview of Italian, Irish, Spanish, UK and EU Legislation. Children & Society, 29(6), 662-675.
• Allen, A. L. (1988). Uneasy Access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Allen, A. L. (1999). Gender and privacy in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1175-1200.
• Balka, E. (1992). Womantalk Goes On-Line: The Use of Computer Networks in the Context of Feminist Social Change, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Simon Fraser University (en línea). https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%EF%80%AD+Balka,+E.+(1992).+Womantalk+Goes+On-Line:+The+Use+of+Computer+Networks+in+the+Context+of+Feminist+Social+Change,+unpublished+Ph.D+dissertation&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
• Balka, E. (1993). Women's Access to On-Line Discussions about Feminism. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(1), Disponible e-mail: comserve@vm.its.rpi.edu.
• Balsamo, A. (2000). Teaching in the belly of the beast: feminism in the best of all places. En K. Sawchuk, J. Marcessault (Eds.), Wild science: feminist cultural studies of science, technology and medicine (pp. 185–214). New York: Routledge.
• Banet-Weiser, S. y M. Miltner, K. M. (2016). #MasculinitySoFragile: culture, structure, and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 171-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490
• Benston, M. L. (1983). For Women the Chips Are Down'. En J. Zimmerman (Ed.), The Tecnological Woman: Interfacing With Tomorrow (pp. 44-54). New York: Praeger.
• Benston, M. L. (1988). 'Women's Voices/Men's Voices: Technology as Language'. En C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch (pp.15-28), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Bernard, E. (1982). The Long Distance Feeling: A History of the Telecommunications Workers Union. Vancouver: New Star Books.
• Bernard, E. (1983). Technological Impact: The Hidden Bias in Machine Design. Proceedings of the First National Conference for Women in Science and Technology. Vancouver: SWIST.
• Biglia, B., y Cagliero, S. (2019). Abordajes y ‘respuestas’ de las universidades catalanas frente a las violencias LGTBIQ+ fóbicas. Quaderns de psicologia. International journal of psychology, 21(2), e1532-e1532.
• Bonet-Martí, J. (en prensa). Los antifeminismos como contramovimiento social: perspectivas teóricas y debates actuales. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 18 (1).
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 1164–1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
• Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping Sociocultural Controversies across Digital Media Platforms: One Week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155338
• Bush, C.G. (1983). Women and the Assessment of Technology: To Think, to Be, to Unthink, to Free. En J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspective on Technology (pp. 151-170), New York: Pergamon.
• Calala Fondo de Mujeres (2020). Las violencias machistas en línea hacia activistas. Datos para entender el fenómeno. Barcelona: Calala Fondo de Mujeres.
• Cerva, D. (2020). Activismo feminista en las universidades mexicanas: la impronta política de las colectivas de estudiantes ante la violencia contra las mujeres. Revista de la educación superior, 49(194), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.36857/resu.2020.194.1128
• Chess, S., Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about# GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.999917
• Citron, D. K. (2009). Law’s expressive value in combating cyber gender harassment. Michigan Law Review, 108(3), 373–415.
• Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Cooley, M. (1980). Architect or Bee? Boston: South End Press.
• Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341
• Ellul, J. (1954). La technique ou l'enjeu du siècle. Paris: Armand Colin.
• European Women’s Lobby (2017). #HerNetHerRights. Mapping the state of online violence against women and girls in Europe. Bélgica: European Comission. (en línea). https://www.womenlobby.org/IMG/pdf/hernetherrights_resource_pack_2017_web_version.pdf
• Figueroa-Sarriera, H. (2017) Imaginarios de sujeto en la era digital: post (identidades) contemporáneas. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones CIESPAL.
• Filipovic, J. (2007). Blogging While Female: How Internet Misogyny parallels "Real-World" Harassment. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 19(1), 295-303.
• Fox, N. J. y Aldred, P. (2018). The materiality of Memory: affects, Remembering and foof decisions. Cultural Sociology, 13(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1749975518764864
• Agencia de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea (2014). Violencia de género contra las mujeres: una encuesta a escala de la UE. Bélgica: Agencia de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea. (en línea). https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-at-a-glance-oct14_es.pdf
• Gehl, R. (2014). Power/freedom on the dark web: A digital ethnography of the Dark web Social Network. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1219-1235.
• Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254-267.
• Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Digital computer: Impact on the social sciences. En N. J. Smelser y P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 3684-3688). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms”. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364.
• Gillespie, T. (2017). Governance of and by platforms. SAGE Handbook of Social Media, 254- 278. (en línea). http://culturedigitally.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GillespieGovernance-ofby-Platforms-PREPRINT.pdf
• Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 10. (en línea). https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401.
• Ging, D., Siapera, E. (2018). Special issue on online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515-524.
• Gómez Gabriel, N. (2020). Primitivismo digital. Tinder y la cosmología neoliberal en la captura del amor romántico. Teknokultura. Revista De Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 17(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.68542
• González Pérez, G. (2019). Escraches en redes feministas universitarias: una estrategia contra la violencia de género hacia las mujeres. Comunicación y Medios, 40, 170-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2019.53974
• Gordo, A. Rivera, J., Díaz-Catalán, C., García, A. (2019). Jóvenes en la encrucijada digital. Itinerarios de socialización y desigualdad en los entornos digitales. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
• Gray, C. H. (1996). Technohistory: Using the History of American Technology in Interdisciplinary Research. Malabar-Florida: Krieger.
• Gray, C. H., Figueroa-Sarriera, H., y Mentor, S. (Eds.). (2020). Modified: Living as a Cyborg. Nueva York/Londres: Routledge.
• Hackworth, L. (2018). Limitations of “Just Gender”: The Need for an Intersectional Reframing of Online Harassment Discourse and Research. En J. R. Vickery, T. Everbach (Ed.), Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment (pp. 50-70). London, UK: Palgrave
• Macmillan. Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. En D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp.149-181). New York: Routledge.
• Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to theoretical concepts. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242.
• Hardaker, C. & McGlashan, M. (2015). “Real men don't hate women": Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
• Hayles, K. (1999). Toward embodied virtuality. En K. Hayles (Ed.), How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics: Chapter 1 (pp. 1-24). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Hess, A., Flores, C. (2016). Simply more than swiping left: A critical analysis oftoxic masculine performances on Tinder Nightmares. New media & Society, 20(3), 1085-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444816681540
• Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: modes, varieties, affordances. En N. G. Fielding, R. Lee, G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of online research methods (pp. 257-270). Londres: Sage.
• Human Rights Council (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (en línea). https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/women/srwomen/pages/srwomenindex.aspx
• Irwin, S.O. (2016). Digital Media: Human–Technology Connection. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Jane, E. (2012). Your a Ugly, Whorish, Slut. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 531-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741073
• Jane, E. A. (2014a). “Back to the kitchen, cunt”: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 28(4), 558–570.
• Jane, E. A. (2014b). “Your a ugly, whorish, slut”: Understanding E-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 531-546.
• Jane, E. A. (2016). Online misogyny and feminist digilantism. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 30(3), 284-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560
• Jane, E. A. (2017). Feminist Digilante Responses to a Slut-Shaming on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1-10. (en línea). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305117705996
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
• Jenkins H., Ford, S., and Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036016.003.0012
• Jenson, J. y Castell, S. (2013). Tipping Points Marginality, Misogyny and Videogames. JCT: Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(2), 72-85.
• Karpf, A. (1987). Recent Feminist Approaches to Women and Technology. Radical Science Journal, 19, 158-170.
• Kramarae, C. (1988). Tecnology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Linn, P. (1987). Gender Stereotypes, Technology Stereotypes. Radical Science Journal, 19, 127-15.
• Mantilla, K. (2013). Gendertrolling: Misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist Studies, 39(2), 563–570.
• Marwick, A. (2016). A new study suggests online harassment is pressuring women and minorities to self-censor. (en línea). https://qz.com/844319/a-new-study-suggestsonline-harassment-is-pressuring-women-and-minorities-to-self-censor/
• Massanari, A. (2017). # Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329-346.
• Massanari, A. L., Chess, S. (2018). Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: The discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 525-542.
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
• Ministerio de Igualdad (2019). Macroencuesta de violencia contra la mujer 2019. Madrid: Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de la Mujer. (en línea). https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/macroencuesta2015/pdf/Macroencuesta_2019_estudio_investigacion.pdf
• Mumford, L. (2010). Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Nagle, A. (2018). Muerte a los normies. Barcelona: Orciny Press.
• Noble, D. F. (1984). Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, New York: Knopf.
• Noble, D. F. (1999). La Religión de la Tecnología. La divinidad del hombre y el espíritu de invención. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Noble, S.U. (2013). Google Search: Hyper-Visibility as a Means of Rendering Black Women and Girls Invisible. InVisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture, 19. http://ivc.lib.rochester.edu/google-search-hyper-visibility-as-a-means-of-rendering-blackwomen-and-girls-invisible/
• O’Donell, C. (2014). On Balinese Cockfights: Deeply Extending Play. Games and culture, 9(6), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412014545783
• Parikka, J. (2012). What is Media Archaeology? Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Penny, L. (2013). Cybersexism: Sex, gender and power on the internet. London: A&C Black.
• Phillips, W. (2015). This is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Plant, S. (1997). Zeros+Ones. Digital Women and The New Technoculture. London: Fourth Estate.
• Przybylski, L. (2020). Hybrid Ethnography: Online, offline and In Between. London: Sage.
• Quodling, A. (2016). Platforms Are Eating Society: Conflict and Governance in Digital Spaces. En A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, A. Johns (Eds.), Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest and Culture (pp. 131-146).
• Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Raman, U., Komarraju, S. A. (2018). Policing responses to crime against women: unpacking the logic of Cyberabad’s “SHE Teams”. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 718-733.
• Ringrose, J., Harvey, L (2015). Boobs, back-off, six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens' sexting images. Continuum: Journal & Cultural Studies, 29 (2), 205-217.
• Sádaba, I. y Gordo, Á. (2010). Del ciborg a la realidad aumentada. Coloquio Gray - Mentor - Figueroa - Sarriera. Minerva: Revista del Círculo de Bellas Artes (13). pp. 74-76. ISSN 1886- 340X. Disponible en http://www.circulobellasartes.com/mediateca/ciborg-realidadaumentada/
• Salter, A., Blodgett, B. (2016). Hypermasculinity & Dickwolves: The contentious role of women in the new gaming public. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56(3), 401–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705199
• Schäfer, M. T. (2011). Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Serra, L. (2018). Las violencias de género en línea. Píkara Magazine. (en línea). http://lab.pikaramagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/VIOLENCIAS.pdf
• Shaw, A. (2014). The Internet Is Full of Jerks, Because the World Is Full of Jerks: What Feminist Theory Teaches Us About the Internet. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(3), 273-277.
• Shaw, F. (2016). ‘‘Bitch I said hi’’: The Bye Felipe campaign and discursive activism in mobile dating apps. Social Media+Society, 2, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672889
• Shepherd, T., Harvey, A., Jordan, T., Srauy, S., & Miltner, K. (2015). Histories of hating. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305115603997
• Smith, J. (1978). Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Due: Women and Appropriate Technology. Butte, Montana: National Center for Appropriate Technology.
• Smith, J. (1983). Women and Appropiate Technology: A Feminist Assessment. En J. Zimmerman (Ed.), The Technological Woman: Interfacing With Tomorrow (pp.65-70), New York: Praeger.
• Smith, D. (1990). Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. New York: Routledge.
• Smith, D. (1992). 'Sociology From Women's Perspectives: A Reaffirmation. Sociological Theory, 10(1), 88-98.
• Thompson, C. (2016). Skirting around the Issue: Problematizing the Representation of Upskirting in Australian Media and Political Discourses. Paper presented at Rethinking Cybercrime 2016, UCLAN, Cybercrime Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, 28 June. (en línea). https://www.academia.edu/26509152/Skirting_Around_the_Issue_Problematizing_the_Representation_of_Upskirting_in_Australian_Media_and_Political_Discourses
• Thompson, C. (2018). “I can be your Tinder nightmare”: Harassment and misogyny in the online sexual marketplace. Femininism & Psychology, 28(1), 69-89.
• Thompson, C., Wood, M. A. (2018). A media archaeology of the creepshot. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 560-574.
• Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Touchstone.
• Turton-Turner, P (2013) Villainous avatars: the visual semiotics of misogyny and free speech in cyberspace. Forum on Public Policy : A Journal of the Oxford Round Table, 1, 1–18.
• UNWomen (2015). Urgent action needed to combat online violence against women and girls. (en línea). https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/9/cyber-violence-reportpress-release
• Van Dijck, J. (2016). La cultura de la conectividad: Una historia crítica de las redes sociales. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
• Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Van Zoonen, L. (2002). Gendering the Internet: Claims, controversies and cultures. European Journal of Communication, 17(5), 5-23.
• Varela, J. (1997). El nacimiento de la mujer burguesa. Madrid: La Piqueta [nueva edición revisada y ampliada en Morata, 2019].
• Vickery, J.R., Everbach,T. (Eds.) (2018). Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Villar, A. y Pecourt, J. (en prensa). Antifeminismo y troleo de género en Twitter. Estudio de la subcultura trol a través de #STOPfeminazis. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 18 (1).
• Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism Confronts Technology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art? Social Studies of Science, 30(3), 447-464.
• Winner, L. (1985). Do artifacts have politics? En D. MacKenzie et al. (Eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology (pp. 26-38). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
• Wood, H. (2018). The Magaluf Girl: a public sex scandal and the digital class relations of social contagion. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 626-642.
• Varela, J. (2011). Mujeres con voz propia. Madrid: Morata.