Dinámicas de información en profesionales de enfermería desde el análisis de redes sociales

  1. Martínez-Gimeno, Maria-Lara 1
  2. Ovalle-Perandones, Maria-Antonia 2
  3. Escobar-Aguilar, Gema 3
  4. Fernández-Martínez, Nélida 4
  5. Benítez- Andrades, Jose Alberto 5
  6. Marqués-Sánchez, Pilar 6
  1. 1 Fundación San Juan de Dios. Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael-Nebrija. Universidad Nebrija
  2. 2 Facultad de Ciencias de la Documentación. Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Santísima Trinidad, 37, despacho 201, 28010 Madrid. España
  3. 3 Fundación San Juan de Dios. Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael-Nebrija. Universidad de Nebrija, Madrid, España
  4. 4 Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas. Facultad de Veterinaria. Universidad de León. Campus of Vegazana s/n, León, 24071. España.
  5. 5 Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica y de Sistemas y Automática. Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana s/n. León Grupo de Investigación SALBIS. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de León, Campus, s/n, 24401 Ponferrada. España.
  6. 6 Grupo de Investigación SALBIS. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de León, Campus, s/n, 24401 Ponferrada. España.
Mostra les afiliacions +
Revista:
Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

ISSN: 1695-6141

Any de publicació: 2021

Volum: 20

Número: 3

Pàgines: 55-85

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.6018/EGLOBAL.470721 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Altres publicacions en: Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

Resum

Introduction: Knowledge is a necessary tool for scientific research and progress in any discipline. But scientific knowledge and information dynamics are not only sustained by individuals but are produced and maintained by groups of people working in the same environment where links and relationships can influence the process. Aim: To analyze the social networks of information source utilization, help/advice for knowledge transfer and the places where nursing professionals share information.Method: Analysis of social networks through a validated questionnaire. Professionals from 6 hospital units were recruited.Results: 77 professionals participated with a mean age of 42.9 (SD:11.48). Peers were the most frequently used source of information (76 choices) compared to databases and scientific articles, which were the least selected (63 choices). Horizontal homophilous networks (professionals with similar status/interests) are the most frequent for obtaining information on research results (74 choices). The care unit is the most pointed environment for sharing information (50 choices).Conclusions: Professionals consider the knowledge of their peers as the main source for obtaining information on research results. Units with a certain degree of specialization use clinical practice guidelines and protocols as the main source of information. Nursing professionals use homophilic-horizontal networks to obtain information. The work environment in its different settings (unit, office, meetings) is the most used for sharing information on research results.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Ramírez A. La teoría del conocimiento en investigación científica: una visión actual. An la Fac Med. 2009;70(3):217-24.
  • Pérez-Fuillerat N, Solano-Ruiz MC, Amezcua M. Conocimiento tácito: características en la práctica enfermera. Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2019;33(2):191-6. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.11.002
  • Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Harvey G, Kitson A, McCormack B. Nursing and Health Care Management and Policy. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? J Adv Nurs. 2004;47(1):81-90.
  • Nilsen P, Ståhl C, Roback K, Cairney P. Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1).
  • Neta G, Brownson RC, Chambers DA. Opportunities for Epidemiologists in Implementation Science: A Primer. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(5):899-910.
  • Crisp N, Iro E. Comment Nursing Now campaign : raising the status of nurses. Lancet [Internet]. 2018;1-2. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30494-X
  • Parchman ML, Scoglio CM, Schumm P. Understanding the implementation of evidence-based care: A structural network approach. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2011;6(1):14. Disponible en: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/14
  • Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, Dziedzic K, Treweek S, Eldridge S, et al. Achieving change in primary care-causes of the evidence to practice gap: Systematic reviews of reviews. Implementation Science. 2016.
  • Dopson S. A view from organizational studies. Nurs Res. 2007;56(4):72-7.
  • Everett MG, Valente TW. Bridging, brokerage and betweenness. Soc Networks [Internet]. 2016;44:202-8. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.09.001
  • Arias N, Calvo MD, Benítez-Andrades JA, Álvarez MJ, Alonso-Cortés B, Benavides C. Socioeconomic status in adolescents: A study of its relationship with overweight and obesity and influence on social network configuration. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9).
  • Quiroga E, Pinto-Carral A, García I, Molina AJ, Fernández-Villa T, Martín V. The influence of adolescents’ social networks on alcohol consumption: A descriptive study of Spanish adolescents using social network analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9).
  • Xu J, Yang R, Reblin M, Clayton M, Ellington L. Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Positive EOL Communication. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2018;56(2):273-80.
  • Creswick N, Westbrook JI. Who Do Hospital Physicians and Nurses Go to for Advice about Medications? A Social Network Analysis and Examination of Prescribing Error Rates. J Patient Saf. 2015;11(3):152-9.
  • Maya I. 7 Usos Del Análisis De Redes En La Intervención Comunitaria. Rev Hisp para el Análisis Redes Soc [Internet]. 2016;27(2):1-10. Disponible en: http://revista-redes.rediris.es
  • Escobar-Aguilar G, Moreno-Casbas MT, González-María E, Martínez-Gimeno ML, Sánchez-Pablo C, Orts-Cortés I. The SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project. J Adv Nurs. 2019;(75):1575-84.
  • Martínez-Gimeno ML, Ovalle Perandones MA, Marqués-Sánchez P, Escobar‐Aguilar G, Fernández-Martínez N, García-García E, et al. Validez de Contenido de un cuestionario para explorar redes sociales de transferencia del conocimiento. En: XXIII Encuentro Internacional de Investigación en Cuidados. Investen-Isciii, editor. Barcelona; 2019.
  • Escobar Aguilar G, Martínez-Gimeno M, MedinaTorres M, Martín de Castro E, Murillo Pérez M, Blanco Abril S. Patrones de utilización de la investigación por los profesionales de enfermería de los hospitales de Madrid. NURE Inv. 2015;12(79).
  • Burt RS. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. 1992.
  • De Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software. Third Edition. Third Edit. Cambridge University Press, editor. New York; 2018.
  • Merrill JA, Yoon S, Larson E, Honig J, Reame N. Using social network analysis to examine collaborative relationships among PhD and DNP students and faculty in a research-intensive university school of nursing. Nurs Outlook [Internet]. 2013;61(2):109-16. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.08.001
  • Keith RE, Hopp FP, Subramanian U, Wiitala W, Lowery JC. Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2010;5(1):99. Disponible en: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/99
  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Vol. 82, Milbank Quarterly. 2004. p. 581-629.
  • Muñoz Jiménez D. From evidence-based nursing to healthcare practice: The evaluation of results as an integrating element. Enferm Clin. 2018;28(3):149-53.
  • Guadarrama-Ortega D. Barriers to the utilisation of research . Descriptive study performed on nurses at a hospital in the southwest of Madrid. Enferm Glob. 2016;(43):275-88.
  • Bond MO, Gaoue OG. Prestige and homophily predict network structure for social learning of medicinal plant knowledge. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(10 October):1-27. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239345
  • Ruzafa-Martínez M, López-Iborra L, Armero Barranco D, Ramos-Morcillo AJ. Effectiveness of an evidence-based practice (EBP) course on the EBP competence of undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2015;38:82-7. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.012
  • Yousefi Nooraie R, Lohfeld L, Marin A, Hanneman R, Dobbins M. Informing the implementation of evidence-informed decision making interventions using a social network analysis perspective; a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1-14.
  • IAB SPAIN. Radiografía del usuario de Redes Sociales Español (estudio IAB Spain). 2017.
  • Fitzgerald L, Harvey G. Translational networks in healthcare? Evidence on the design and initiation of organizational networks for knowledge mobilization. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2015;138:192-200. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.015
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet