Diversidad en el gobierno corporativo. Análisis configuracional de la presencia de mujeres en los consejos de administración

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2004). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom. Finance Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.594506
• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
• Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, XLIV(April), 179–198.
• Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What is the Trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040669
• Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049
• Amable, B., Ernst, E., & Palombarini, S. (2005). How do financial markets affect industrial relations : an institutional complementarity approach. Socio.Economic Review, (3), 311–330.
• Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling the presence of revisited: The presence of Women on Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98
• Aversa, P., Furnari, S., & Haefliger, S. (2015). Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005-2013. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv012
• Barkema, H. G., & Shvyrkov, O. (2007). Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.604
• Beynon, M. J., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. (2016). Country-based comparison analysis using fsQCA investigating entrepreneurial attitudes and activity ☆. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.091
• Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., & Romano, R. (2008). The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. Columbia Law Review, 108, 1803–1882.
• Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on Corporate Boards in Italy: The Role of Family Connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12097
• Bilimoria, D. (2008). Directions for future research on women on corporate boards of directors. Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice, 233–240.
• Blau, F. D., & Devaro, J. (2007). New Evidence on Gender Differences in Promotion Rates : An Empirical Analysis of a Sample of New Hires. Industrial Relations, 46(3), 511–550.
• Boutchkova, M., Gonzalez, A., Main, B. G. M., & Sila, V. (2020). Gender diversity and the spillover effects of women on boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, (August), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12339
• Burke, R. (1999). Women on Canadian Corporate Boards of Directors: getting the numbers right! Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(4), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00167
• Burke, R. J. (2000). Company size, board size and numbers of women corporate directors. In Women on corporate boards of directors (pp. 157–167). Springer.
• Campbell, J. L. (2011). The US financial crisis : lessons for theories of institutional complementarity, 211–234.
• Campbell, K., & Mínguez-vera, A. (2007). The Influence Of Gender On Spanish Boards Of Directors: An Empirical Analysis (No. WP-EC 2007-08). Cartagena (Murcia).
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38(March), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
• Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores. (2015). Código Unificado de buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas, 30.
• Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores. (2020). Código de buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Comisión Nacional Del Mercado de Valores, 50.
• Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2017). Firm performance and boardroom gender diversity: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Business Research, 79, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.006
• Conyon, M. J., & Mallin, C. (1997). Women in the Boardroom: Evidence from large UK companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(3), 112–117.
• Crilly, D. (2011). Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 694–717. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.57
• Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429–1448.
• D’Netto, B, & Sohal, A. S. (1999). Human resource practices and workforce diversity: an empirical assessment. International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910302723
• D’Netto, Brian, Shen, J., Chelliah, J., & Monga, M. (2014). Human resource diversity management practices in the Australian manufacturing sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(9), 1243–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.826714
• De Abreu Dos Reis, C. R., Sastre Castillo, M. Á., & Roig Dobón, S. (2007). Diversity and business performance: 50 years of research. Service Business, 1(4), 257–274. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11628-007-0022-2
• de Cabo, R. M., Gimeno, R., & Escot, L. (2011). Disentangling Discrimination on Spanish Boards of Directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00837.x
• de Jonge, A. (2014). The glass ceiling that refuses to break: Women directors on the boards of listed firms in China and India. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47(PB), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.01.008
• Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835. https://doi.org/10.2307/256713
• Dunn, P. (2012). The Role of Gender and Human Capital on the Appointment of New Corporate Directors to Boardroom Committees: Canadian Evidence. International Business Research, 5(5), 16–25. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n5p16
• Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993-2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance, 17(3), 266–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x
• Eagly, Alice H. (2016). When Passionate Advocates Meet Research on Diversity, Does the Honest Broker Stand a Chance? Journal of Social Issues, 72(1, SI), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12163
• Eagly, Alice H, & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65(3), 216.
• Eagly, Alice Hendrickson, Eagly, L. L. C. A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press.
• Esteban-Salvador, M. L. (2011). Variables influencing the gender composition of boards: the Spanish evidence. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 32(4), 305–332.
• Etzioni, A. (1961). Complex organizations: A sociological reader. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Federo, R., & Saz-Carranza, A. (2018). A configurational analysis of board involvement in intergovernmental organizations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(6), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12241
• Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. (2002). Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’ of U.K. IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 941–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.269
• Filatotchev, I., & Wright, M. (2017). Methodological issues in governance research: An editor’s perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(6), 454–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12211
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.
• Francisco Martin-Ugedo, J., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). firm performance and women on the board: evidence from spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Feminist economics, 20(3), 136–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404
• Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5
• Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Aguilera, R., Fiss, P. C., & Greckhamer, T. (2016). Embracing Causal Complexity. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
• García-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V., & Ariño, M. A. (2013). Bundles of Firm Corporate Governance Practices: A Fuzzy Set Analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12024
• García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I.-M., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 53, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.002
• Gordini, N., & Rancati, E. (2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance. Management Research Review, 40(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2016-0039
• Greckhamer, T. (2011). Cross-cultural differences in compensation level and inequality across occupations: A set-theoretic analysis. Organization Studies, 32(1), 85–115.
• Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R. (2008). Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Strategic Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 695–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107302907
• Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National Institutional Systems as Antecedents of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678683.2010.00830.x
• Harrigan, K. R. (1981). Numbers and Positions Of Women Elected to Corporate Boards. Academy of Management Journal , 24(3), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/255580
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
• Haxhi, I., & Aguilera, R. V. (2017). An Institutional Configurational Approach to Cross-National Diversity in Corporate Governance. Journal of Management Studies, 54(3), 261–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12247
• Hillman, A. J. (2015). Board Diversity: Beginning to Unpeel the Onion. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12090
• Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279222
• Höpner, M. (2005). What connects industrial relations and corporate governance ? Explaining institutional complementarity, 331–358.
• Huarng, K.-H., Rey-Martí, A., & Miquel-Romero, M.-J. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis in business. Journal of Business Research, 89(February), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.032
• Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional Complementarities and Gender Diversity on Boards: A Configurational Approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12140
• Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a «Critical Mass?» Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
• Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board Composition Beyond Independence. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463938
• Judge, W. (2008). Editorial: Methodological pluralism. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 8683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00710.x
• Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2012). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr025
• Kirsch, A. (2018). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.001
• Kosko, B., & Toms, M. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic. Hyperion New York.
• Kumar, P, & Zattoni, A. (2015). In search of a greater pluralism of theories and methods in governance research. Corporate Governance (Oxford), 23(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12101
• Kumar, Praveen, & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate Governance, Board Gender Diversity and Firm Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 388–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12172
• Low, D. C. M., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-basin finance journal, 35(A), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.02.008
• Macduffie, J. P. (1995). Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2524483
• Madanoglu, M., Kizildag, M., & Ozdemir, O. (2018). Which bundles of corporate governance provisions lead to high firm performance among restaurant firms? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72 (February), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.006
• Mahadeo, J. D., & Soobaroyen, T. (2012). Board Composition and Financial Performance : Uncovering the Effects of Diversity in an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0973-z
• Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2016). Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
• Marlin, D., & Geiger, S. W. (2011). The Composition Of Corporate Boards Of Directors: Pre- And Post-Sarbanes-Oxley. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 9.
• Mateos de Cabo, R., Gimeno, R., & Nieto, M. (2012). Gender Diversity on European Banks’ Boards of Directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1112-6
• Mcnulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, T. (2013). Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12006
• Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.5465/256809
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations : Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony Author ( s ): John W . Meyer and Brian Rowan Source : American Journal of Sociology , Vol . 83 , No . 2 ( Sep ., 1977 ), pp . 340-363 Published by : The University of Chicago Press St. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
• Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0728
• Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are Demographic Attributes and Firm Characteristics Drivers of Gender Diversity? Investigating Women’s Positions on French Boards of Directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1576-z
• Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x
• Peretz, H., Levi, A., & Fried, Y. (2015). Organizational diversity programs across cultures: effects on absenteeism, turnover, performance and innovation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 875–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.991344
• Perrow, C. (1979). Organizational theory in a society of organizations. Ecole Nationale d’Administration Publique.
• Petersen, T., & Morgan, L. A. (1995). Separate and Unequal : Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 329–365.
• Pilar, N. R., & Joaquina, D. F. (2017). Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance ? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9
• Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319
• Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Bel-Oms, I. (2020). Cultural environments and the appointment of female directors on boards: An analysis from a global perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, (October), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2065
• Ragin, C. C. (1997). Turning the tables: how case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research Comparative Social Research, Volume 16, 1997, pages 27-42. Charles C. Ragin. Comparative Social Research, 16, 1–11.
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
• Ragin, C. C. (2004). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 123.
• Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry - Presentation. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
• Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
• Ragin, C. C., & Davey, S. (2014). fs/QCA [Computer Programme] Version [2.5/3.0]. Irvine: University of California.
• Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, 240, 190–212.
• Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. (1995). Boards of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative Governance Mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 85–99.
• Roth, P. L., Purvis, K. L., & Bobko, P. (2010). A Meta-Analysis of Gender Group Differences for Measures of Job Performance in Field Studies, XX(X), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310374774
• Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Clark, E. (2016). Do Political Connections Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from a Developing Country. Emerging markets finance and trade, 52(8), 1876–1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1041845
• Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Yousaf, A. (2016). Firm-level determinants of gender diversity in the boardrooms: Evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 25(5), 1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.01.002
• Samara, G., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2018). Independent directors and family firm performance: does one size fit all? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0455-6
• Shen, J., D’Netto, B., & Tang, J. (2010). Effects of human resource diversity management on organizational citizen behaviour in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2156–2172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.509622
• Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324324
• Singh, V., Vinnicombe, S., & Johnson, P. (2001). Women Directors on Top UK Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00248
• Smith, N., & Parrotta, P. (2018). Why so few women on boards of directors? Empirical evidence from danish companies in 1998-2010. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2974-9
• Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54
• Stamarski, C. S., & Son Hing, L. S. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(September), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400
• Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
• Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
• Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1990). Determinants of board directors’ strategic involvement. European Management Journal, 8(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(90)90082-H
• Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. (2008). Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678683.2008.00661.x
• Zattoni, A., Douglas, T., & Judge, W. (2013). Developing Corporate Governance Theory through Qualitative Research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12016