Meta-análisis de generalización de la fiabilidad del cuestionario FIT-Choice (Factores que influyen en la elección de la enseñanza como carrera)

  1. Enrique Navarro-Asencio 1
  2. Esther López-Martín 2
  3. Inmaculada Asensio-Muñoz 1
  4. Eva Expósito-Casas 2
  5. Elvira Carpintero-Molina 1
  6. Covadonga Ruiz De Miguel 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
Revista de educación

ISSN: 0034-8082

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Profesores para el siglo XXI : perfil académico, formación inicial y prácticas docentes de los profesores españoles

Número: 393

Páginas: 231-260

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-393-492 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de educación

Proyectos relacionados

Perfil aptitudinal, actitudinal y de rendimiento académico previo de los aspirantes a estudios de magisterio: consecuencias para la selección en el ingreso a la universidad

25389

Resumen

La eficacia docente depende de factores académicos y no académicos. Entre los segundos, la motivación es una característica muy estudiada para determinar quién accede a los estudios de maestro. En este contexto, el instrumento FIT-Choice (Factors Influencing Teaching Choice) es de los más utilizados a nivel mundial y cuenta con diversas adaptaciones de idioma y de estructura dimensional. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la fiabilidad de las distintas escalas empleadas y su variabilidad entre los trabajos que la usan, mediante la técnica de meta-análisis de generalización de la fiabilidad. Concretamente se propone un modelo de efectos aleatorios para estimar la fiabilidad media y se estudia la heterogeneidad de los coeficientes con los estadísticos Q de Cochran y I2. También se emplea la meta-regresión para conocer el efecto de variables moderadoras relacionadas con el instrumento (tipo de FIT-Choice, idioma de la prueba) y de la muestra (tipo de docente, % de mujeres y edad). Los resultados muestran una buena fiabilidad promedio en la mayor parte de las subescalas, excepto en tres, movilidad en el trabajo, elección de la carrera como opción alternativa y dificultad percibida, con valores por debajo de 0.7. Destaca la gran variabilidad de la fiabilidad entre estudios, siendo la escala de satisfacción la que presenta mayor heterogeneidad. Los hallazgos muestran cómo la variación de la fiabilidad de algunas escalas está vinculada a las características del FIT-Choice utilizado y al tipo de docente.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Australian Institute for Training and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Recuperado de: https:// www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/ australian-professional-standards-for-teachers.pdf
  • Akpochafo, G.O. (2020). Factors influencing undergraduates’ choice of teaching as a career (Fit-choice) in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8, 121-133. https://doi.org/10.18488/ journal.61.2020.81.121.133
  • Alpaslan, M. M., Ulubey, O. y Yildirim, K. (2018). Examining the contributions of support and class belonging to preservice teachers’ career motivation in Turkey, Turkish Journal of Education. 7(4), 196- 209. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.458535
  • Barber, M. y Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey y Co.
  • Berger J.-L. y D’Ascoli Y. (2012a). Becoming a VET teacher as a second career: Investigating the determinants of career choice and their relation to perceptions about prior occupation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598 66X.2012.700046
  • Berger J.-L. y D’Ascoli Y. (2012b). Motivations to Become Vocational Education and Training Educators: A Person-Oriented Approach. Vocations and Learning, 5, 225-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s12186-012-9075-z
  • Berger, J.-L. y Girardet, C. (2020). Vocational teachers’ classroom management style: the role of motivation to teach and sense of responsibility. European Journal of Teacher Education, (online first) https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1764930
  • Bonett, D. G. (2010). Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability. Psychological methods, 15(4), 368-385. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0020142Botella, J., Suero, M. y Gambara, H. (2010). Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 386- 397. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019626
  • Brookhart, S. M. y Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543062001037
  • Choi, S. y Song, J. (2015). Korean pre-service English teachers’ motivations for choosing a teaching career. International Information Institute (Tokyo), 18(3), 921-925.
  • Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S. y Major, L. E. (2014) What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research. Research Report. Recuperado de: https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/ uploads/2014/10/What-Makes-Great-Teaching-REPORT.pdf
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. Model of achievemente-related choices. En A. J. Elliot y C. S. Dweck (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivativon. Guilford.
  • Eren, A. y Tezel, K.V. (2010). Factors influencing teaching choice, professional plans about teaching, and future time perspective: A mediational analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1416-1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.05.001
  • Fray, L. y Gore, J. (2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.009
  • Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. y Canrinus, E. (2012a). Adaptive and Maladaptive Motives for Becoming a Teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 38(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02607476.2012.643652
  • Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. y Canrinus, E. (2012b). The Factors Influencing Teaching (FIT)-Choice scale in a Dutch teacher education program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 249-269. https://doi. org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.700043
  • Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. y Canrinus, E.T. (2014). Motivation for becoming a teacher and engagement with the profession: Evidence from different contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 65-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.012
  • Goldhaber, D. (2010). Teacher Pay Reforms: The Political Implications of Recent Research. Working paper no. 2010-4.0. Center for Education Data and Research (CEDR), University of Washington. Recuperado de http://www.cedr.us/papers/working/CEDR%20WP%202010-4_ Teacher%20Pay%20Reforms%20(8-23-10).pdf
  • Goller, M., Ursin, J., Vahasantanen, K., Festner, D. y Harteis, C. (2019). Finnish and German student teachers’ motivations for choosing teaching as a career. The first application of the FIT-Choice scale in Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 235-248. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.023
  • Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J. y Barnow, Z. B. (2011). The reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0022441
  • Gratacós, G. y López-Jurado, M. (2016). Validación de la versión en español de la escala de los factores que influyen en la elección de los estudios de educación (FIT-choice). Revista de Educación, 372, 87- 110. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-372-316
  • Greco, L. M., O’Boyle, E.H., Cockburn, B.S. y Yuan, Z. (2018). Metaanalysis of coefficient alpha: A reliability generalization study. Journal of Management Studies, 55(4), 583-618. https://psycnet.apa.org/ doi/10.1111/joms.12328
  • Hattie, J. A. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta- Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  • Hattie, J. A. (2011). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.
  • Hedges, L. V. y Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
  • Heinz, M. (2015). Why choose teaching? An international review of empirical studies exploring student teachers’ career motivations and levels of commitment to teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(3), 258-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1 018278
  • Heinz, M., Keane, E. y Foley, C. (2017). Career motivations of student teachers in the republic of Ireland continuity and change during educational reform and ‘boom to bust’ economic times. In H.M.G. Watt, P.W. Richardson, y K. Smith (Eds.) Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 22-54). Cambridge University Press.
  • Hennessy, J. y Lynch, R. (2017). I Chose to Become a Teacher Because”. Exploring the Factors Influencing Teaching Choice Amongst Pre- Service Teachers in Ireland. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 45(2), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1183188
  • Higgins, J. P. y Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. https://doi. org/10.1002/sim.1186
  • INEE (2020). TALIS 2018. Marco conceptual. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional.
  • Jablanovic, M.M. y Vracar, S. (2019). Exploring Serbian teachers’ motivation for teaching with the application of FIT-choice scale. Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 51(1), 7-45. https://doi. org/10.2298/ZIPI1901007M
  • Jamovi project (2020). jamovi. (Version 1.6) [Computer Software]. Recuperado de https://www.jamovi.org.
  • Jordan, H. R., Mendro, R. L. y Weerasinghe, D. (1997). Teacher effects on longitudinal student achievement: A preliminary report on research on teacher effectiveness. National Evaluation Institute, Indianapolis, IN. Recuperado de https://www.dallasisd.org/cms/lib/TX01001475/ Centricity/Shared/evalacct/research/articles/Jordan-Teacher-Effectson- Longitudinal-Student-Achievement-1997.pdf
  • Jugovic, I., Marusic, I., Ivanec, T.P. y Vidovic, V.V. (2012). Motivation and personality of preservice teachers in Croatia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 271-287. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/135 9866X.2012.700044
  • Kilinc, A., Watt, H.M.G. y Richardson, P.W. (2012). Factors Influencing Teaching Choice in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 199-226. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.700048
  • Klassen, R. M. y Dolan, R. (2015, September). Selection for teacher education in the UK and the Republic of Ireland: A proposal for innovation. Presented at the meeting of the European Conference on Educational Research, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Klassen, R. M. y Kim, L. E. (2017) Assessing critical attributes of prospective teachers: Implications for selection into initial teacher education programs. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Monograph Series II, 12, 5-22.
  • Klassen, R. M., Al-Dhafri, S., Hannok, W. y Betts, S.M. (2011). Investigating pre-service teacher motivation across cultures using the Teachers’ Ten Statements Test. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.012
  • Konig, J. y Rothland, M. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: effects on general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 289-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.700045
  • Lawver, R. G. (2009). Factors influencing agricultural education students’ choice to teach (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Missouri. https:// doi.org/10.32469/10355/6168
  • Lawver, R. G. (2012). An Analysis of Post-Secondary Agricultural Education Students’ Choice to Teach. Journal of Agricultural Education. 53(2), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.02028
  • Lin, E., Shi, Q.M., Wang, J., Zhang, S.A. y Hui, L. (2012). Initial motivations for teaching: comparison between preservice teachers in the United States and China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.700047
  • MacKenzie, D. (2013). Choosing a career: a study of motivational factors and demographics that influence P-12 pre-service teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Louisville. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/ etd/877/
  • Nesje, K., Brandmo, C. y Berger, J.L. (2018). Motivation to Become a Teacher: a Norwegian Validation of the Factors Influencing Teaching Choice Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 813-831. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306804
  • OECD (2017). Do new teachers feel prepared for teaching? Teaching in Focus, 17. OECD Publ.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/980bf07d-en.
  • Ozturk-Akar, E. (2012). Motivations of Turkish Pre-service Teachers to Choose Teaching as a Career. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10) http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n10.7
  • Ozturk-Akar, E. (2019). Alternative Teacher Certification Students’ Motivations Of Teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 44(11), http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44.n11.3
  • Ponnock, A. R. (2018). Motivational Differences throughout Teachers’ Preparation and Career. New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal, 21(2), 26-45. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ1211293.pdf
  • Richardson, P. W. y Watt, H. M. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27-56. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/13598660500480290
  • Ridgewell, N.M. (2018). Is It the Right “Fit?” Florida Teachers’ Motivations for Choosing a Teaching Career Using the FIT-Choice Scale (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Florida. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0052721
  • Rodriguez, M. C. y Maeda, Y. (2006). Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082- 989X.11.3.306
  • Said-Hung, E., Gratacós, G. y Valencia, J. (2017). Factores que influyen en la elección de las carreras de pedagogía en Colombia. Educaçao e Pesquisa, 43, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-9702201701160978
  • Sánchez-Meca, J., López-López, J. A. y López-Pina, J. A. (2013). Some recommended statistical analytic practices when reliability generalization studies are conducted. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(3), 402-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.2044-8317.2012.02057.x
  • Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264300002-en
  • Suryani, A., Watt, H.M.G. y Richardson, P.W. (2016). Students’ motivations to become teachers: FIT-Choice findings from Indonesia. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 3(3), 179-203. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijqre.2016.077802Taimalu M., Luik P. y Täht, K. (2017). Teaching motivations and perceptions during the first year of teacher education in Estonia. In H.M.G. Watt, P.W. Richardson, y K. Smith (Eds.) Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 189-219). Cambridge University Press.
  • Topkaya, E. y Uztosun, M. S. (2012). Choosing Teaching as a Career: Motivations of Pre-service English Teachers in Turkey. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 126-134. http://dx.doi. org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.126-134
  • Torsney, B.M., Lombardi, D. y Ponnock, A. (2019). The role of values in pre-service teachers’ intentions for professional engagement. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443 410.2018.1504892
  • Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance inmeasurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(1), 6-20. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058001002
  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48. https://doi. org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03Van Overschelde, J.P. y Garza, R. (2019). Motivational and perceptual differences between Hispanic and White preservice teachers. Journal of Latinos and Education, 19(3), 277- 293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2018.1510331
  • Wang, W. (2019) ‘I really like teaching, but…’ A mixed methods study exploring pre-service teachers’ motivations for choosing teaching as a career (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Glasgow. http://theses. gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/72474
  • Watt, H. M. G. y Richardson, P.W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FITChoice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167-202
  • Watt, H. M., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U. y Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and teacher education, 28(6), 791-805. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.003
  • Zhang, H.W., Wu, J.J. y Zhu, Y. (2020). Why do you choose to teach Chinese as a second language? A study of pre-service CSL teachers’ motivations. System, 91, 102242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102242
  • Zordo, L. de, Hagenauer, G y Hascher, T. (2019). Student teachers’ emotions in anticipation of their first team practicum. Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1758-1767.https://doi-org.bucm.idm.oclc. org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665321
  • Silvestre, E., Figueroa, V. y Díaz, J.V. (2020). ¿Por qué los estudiantes de la Universidad Pedagógica ISFODOSU escogen la carrera de Educación? Ciencia y Educación, 1, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.22206/cyed.2020. v4i1.pp47-69
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet