Repensar los cuidadosde las prácticas a la ontopolítica

  1. Fernando J. García Selgas 1
  2. María Teresa Martín Palomo 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Almería, España
Aldizkaria:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Alea: 79

Zenbakia: 3

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista internacional de sociología

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

This paper is a theoretical review of the course followed by most of the main care researches, along with feminist claims of its centrality. We argue that it arrives at a concept of care as complex socio-practical processes which are fundamental for subjectivities, social consensus and the perpetuation of a common world. Thinking about interdependence in such practices, ‘ethics of care’ and the emergence of a post-humanist perspective, we are able to go, in a second movement, beyond that concept describing the specific logic of care practices as a tinkering logic and claiming for a transition from those ethics to an eventual ontology of “matters of care” which is inevitably political and changes our vision of ourselves and our placement in environment.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Badgett, M. V. L. y Folbre, N. 1999. “¿Quién cuida de los demás? Normas sociosexuales y consecuencias económicas”. Revista Internacional del Trabajo 118 (3): 347-365.
  • Baldassar, L. y L. Merla ed. 2014. Trasnational families, migration and the circulation of care. London: Routledge.
  • Benhabib, S. 1987. “The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Moral Theory”. Pp 154-78 en Women and Moral Theory, editado por E. Feder Kittay y D. Meyers. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Daly, M. y J. Lewis. 2000. “The Concept Of Social Care And The Analysis Of Contemporary Welfare States”. British Journal Of Sociology 1: 281-298.
  • Denis, J. y D. Pontille. 2015. “Material Ordering and the Care of Things”. Science, Technology, and Human Values 40 (3): 338-367. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4371239.
  • Domínguez-Rubio, F. 2020. Still Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Donati, P. 2006. Repensar la sociedad. El enfoque relacional. Madrid: EUNSA.
  • Duclos, V. y T. Sánchez Criado. 2019. “Care in Trouble: Ecologies of Support from Below and Beyond”. Medical Anthropology Quartely 34 (2): 153-173.
  • Durán, M. Á. 2018. La riqueza invisible del cuidado. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
  • Elshtain, J. B. 1983. “Antigone’s daughters: reflections on female identity and the state”. Pp. 300-311 en Families, politics and public policy, eds. I. Diamond. N. York: Longman.
  • García Selgas, F. 2008. “Posthumanismo(s) y ciencias sociales: una introducción”. Politica y Sociedad 45(3): 7-15.
  • Gelsthorpe, L., P. Mody y B. Sloan ed. 2020. Spaces of Care. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Gilligan, C. 1985. La moral y la teoría: psicología del desarrollo femenino. México: FCE.
  • Harbers, H. y J. Pols. 2010. “Animal farm love stories About care and economy Telecare What patients care about”. Pp 141-194 en Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, editado por A. Mol, I. Moser y J. Pols. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Harding, R., R. Fletcher y C. Beasley eds. 2016. Revaluating Care in Theory, Law and Policy: Circles and Connections. Londres: Taylor & Francis.
  • Hochschild, A. R. 1995. “The Culture of Politics: Traditional, Post-modern, Cold-modern, and Warm-modern Ideals of Care”. Social Politics 2 (3): 331-345.
  • Hochschild, A. R. 2008. La mercantilización de la vida íntima: apuntes de la casa y el trabajo. Buenos Aires: Katz.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 2016. “Comment 3: Widening the Scope and Moving Beyond Care Chains”. Papers 101 (2): 271-274.
  • Illouz, E. 2012. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Jackson, S. J. 2014. “Rethinking Repair”. Pp. 221-239 en Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society, eds. P. Tarleton Gillespie. Cambridge (Mas): MIT Press.
  • Latour, B. 2004. “Why has critique gone out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern”. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 224-48.
  • Latour, B. 2008. “What is the style of matters of concern? Two lectures in empirical philosophy”. University of Amsterdam. Consulta 14 de agosto de 2019, http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/161.html.
  • Latour, B. 2013. Políticas de la naturaleza. Barcelona: RBA.
  • Law, J. 2010. “Care and killing: Tensions in Veterinary Practice”. Pp. 57-72 en Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, eds. A. Mol, I. Moser y J. Pols. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Laugier, S. 2015. “La vulnérabilité des formes de vie”. Raisons politiques 57 (1): 65- 80.
  • Martín Palomo, M. T. 2008. “«Domesticar» el trabajo: una reflexión a partir de los cuidados”. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales 26 (2): 13-44.
  • Martín Palomo, M. T. 2016. Cuidado, vulnerabilidad e interdependencias. Nuevos retos políticos. Madrid: CEPC.
  • Martin, A., N. Myers y A. Viseu. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience”. Social Studies of Science 45: 625-41.
  • Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care. New York: Routledge.
  • Mol, A, I. Moser y J. Pols (editoras). 2010. Care in practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
  • Molinier, P. 2005. “Le care à l’épreuve du travail. Vulnérabilités croisées et savoir-faire discrets”. Pp. 299-316 en Le souci des autres, éthique et politique du care, eds. P. Paperman y S. Laugier. Paris: EHESS.
  • Murphy, M. 2015. “Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices”. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 717-737.
  • Nakano Glenn, E. 2000. “Creating a care Society”. Contemporary Sociology 29 (1): 84-94.
  • Noddings, N. 1995. “Caring”. Pp. 7-30 en Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics, eds. V. Held. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Paperman, P. 2009. “D’une voix discordante: désentimentaliser le care, démoralicer l’éthique”. Pp. 89-114 en Qu’est-ce que le care?, eds. P. Molinier, P. Paperman y S. Laugier. Paris: Payot.
  • Paperman, P. 2010. “La voix différente et la portée politique de l’éthique du care”. Pp. 79-90 en Carol Gilligan et l’éthique du care, dir. V. Nurock. Paris: Puf.
  • Pols, J. 2010. “Telecare: What patients care about”. Pp. 171-194 en Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, eds. A. Mol, I. Moser y J. Pols. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. “Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things”. Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85-106.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2012. “Nothing comes without its world’: thinking with care”. The Sociological Review 60 (2): 197-216.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2017. Matters of Care. London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Razavi, S. 2007. The Political and Social Economy of Care in a Development Context. Conceptual Issues, Research Questions and Policy Options, Gender and Development, Programme Paper Number 3. Switzweland: UNRISD. Consulta 12 julio de 2020. https://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpPublications)/2DBE6A93350A7783C12573240036D5A0
  • Russell, A. y L. Vinsel. 2018. “After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance”. Technology and Culture 59 (1):1-25.
  • Shannon, M. 2018. “Maintenance and Care”. Places Journal, November 2018. Pp. 1-35. Consulta 29 noviembre de 2020.
  • Singleton, V. 2010. “Good farming: Control or care?”. Pp. 235-256 en Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, eds. A. Mol, I. Moser y J. Pols. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Sormani, P., A. Bouvet e I. Strebel. 2019. “Introduction: When Things Break Down”. Pp. 1-27 en Repair Work Ethnographies: Revisiting Breakdown, Relocating Materiality, eds. I. Strebel A. Bovet y Ph. Sormani. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thomas, C. 1993. “De-constructing Concepts of Care”. Sociology 27(4): 649-669.
  • Torns, T. 2008. “El trabajo y el cuidado: cuestiones teórico-metodológicas desde la perspectiva de género”. Empiria, Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales 15: 53-73.
  • Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
  • Tronto, J. 2016. “Comment 2: Transnational Care: Family Life and Complexities of Circulation and Citizenship”. Papers 101 (2): 265-269.
  • Tronto, J y B. Fisher. 1990. “Toward a feminist theory of caring”. Pp. 36-54 en Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, eds. E. K. Abel and M. K. Nelson. Albany: State University of New York.
  • Venturiello, P., Gómez-Bueno, C. y Martín Palomo, M. T. 2020. “Entramados de interdependencias, cuidados y autonomía en situaciones de diversidad funcional”. Papeles del CEIC 2020/2, 234: 1-19.
  • Winance, M. 2010. “Care and disability Practices of experimenting, tinkering with, and arranging people and technical aids”. Pp. 93-118 en Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, eds. A. Mol, I. Moser y J. Pols. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Willems, D. 2010. “Varieties of goodness in high-tech home care”. Pp. 257-276 en Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, eds. A. Mol, I. Moser y J. Pols. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet