Do the BSRI and PAQ Really Measure Masculinity and Femininity?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Agbayani, P., & Min, J. W. (2007). Examining the validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory for use with Filipino Americans using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 15, 55-80.
• Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
• Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499-528.
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago, CA: Rand McNally.
• Baucom, D. H. (1976). Independent masculinity and femininity scales on the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 876.
• Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. New York: Greenwood Press.
• Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
• Bem, S. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Cohen critiques. Jounrnal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1047-1054.
• Berzins, J. I., Welling, M. A., & Wetter, R. E. (1978). A new measurement of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126-138.
• Brems, C., & Johnson, M. E. (1990). Reexamination of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: The interpersonal BSRI. Journal of Personality Assessmentc 55, 484-498.
• Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr., & Thompson, B. (1997). The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI): Confirmatory analysis of long and short forms. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118-124. (Pubitemid 127018231)
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. London: Sage.
• Caussinus, H. (1966). Contribution a l'analyse statistique des tableaux de corrélation. Annales de la Faculté de Sciences de l'Université de Toulouse, 29 (anné 1965), 77-182.
• Choi, N., & Fuqua, D. R. (2003). The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 872-887. (Pubitemid 37215407)
• Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2006). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 818-832.
• Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2008). The Bem SexRole Inventory: Continuing theoretical problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 881-900.
• Colley, A., Mulhern, G., Maltby, J., & Wood, A. M. (2009). The short form BSRI: Instrumentality, expressiveness and gender associations among a United Kingdom sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 384-387.
• Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to the famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389-407.
• Díaz-Loving, R., Rocha, T. E., & Rivera, S. (2004). Elaboración, validación y estandarización de un inventario para evaluar las dimensiones atributivas de instrumentalidad y expresividad. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38, 263-276.
• Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
• Ely, R., & Ryan, E. (2008). Remembering talk: Individual and gender differences in reported speech. Memory, 16, 395-409. (Pubitemid 351586999)
• Fernández, J. (1983). Nuevas perspectivas en la medida de la masculinidad y feminidad. Madrid: Editorial de la Universidad Complutense.
• Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., Del Olmo, I., & Rodríguez, A. (2007). Escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: estado actual de la cuestión. Psicothema, 19, 357-365.
• Fink, B., Brewer, G., Fehl, K., & Neave, N. (2007). Instrumentality and lifetime number of sexual partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 747-756.
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
• Good, G. E., Wallace, D. L., & Borst, T. S. (1994). Masculinity research: A review and critique. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 3-14.
• Goodman, L. A. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1091-1131.
• Gough, H. G. (1952). Identifying psychological femininity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 12, 427-439.
• Harris, A. (1994). Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: A replication study of item selection for de Bem Sex Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 31, 241-273.
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.
• Heilbrum, A. B. (1976). Measurement of masculine and feminine sex roles identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 183-190.
• Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929-941.
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1998). LISREL8. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
• Kaschak, E., & Sharratt, S. (1983). A Latin American Sex Role Inventory. Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 18, 3-6.
• Koestler.A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London: Hutchinson.
• Koestler, A. (1978). Janus: A summing up. New York: Vintage Books.
• Konrad, A. M., & Harris, C. (2002). Desirability of the Bem SexRole Inventory for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European Americans. Sex Roles, 47, 259-271.
• Kracher, B., & Marble, R. P. (2008). The significance of gender in predicting the cognitive moral development of business practitioners using the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 503-526.
• Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method (2nd. ed.). London: Buterworths.
• Lenney, E. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity and androgyny. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 573-660). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Leung, C., & Moore, S. (2003). Individual and cultural gender roles: A comparison of Anglo-Australians and Chinese in Australia. Current Research in Social Psychology, 8, 302-316. (Pubitemid 38816816)
• Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 57-78.
• Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd. Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
• Marsh, H. W. (1985). The structure of masculinity/femininity: An application of confirmatory factor analysis to higher order factor structures and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 427-449.
• Marsh, H. W., & Myers, M. R. (1986). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 14, 397-430.
• Mateo, M. A., & Fernández, J. (1991). La dimensionalidad de los conceptos de masculinidad y feminidad. Investigaciones Psicológicas, 9, 95-116.
• Maznah, I., & Choo, P. F. (1986). The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI). International Journal of Psychology, 21, 31-41.
• Myers, A., & Gonda, G. (1982). Utility of the masculinityfemininity construct: Comparison of traditional and androgyny approaches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 514-522.
• Oswald, P. A. (2004). An examination of the current usefulness of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Psychological Reports, 94, 1331-1336.
• Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.). (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. New York: Free Press.
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996-1016.
• Peng, T. K. (2006). Construct validation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Taiwan. Sex Roles, 55, 843-851.
• Signorella, M. L. (1999). Multidimensionality of gender schemas: Implications for the development of gender-related characteristics. In W.B. Swann, Jr., J.H. Langlois, & L.A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society. The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 107-126).
• Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Spence, J. T. (1991). Do the BSRI and PAQ measure the same or different concepts? Psychology of Women Quarterly 15, 141-165.
• Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624-635.
• Spence, J., & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
• Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex roles stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.
• Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on Sex Role Attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.
• Strong, E. K. (1936). Interest of men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 49-67.
• Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Twenge, J. M. (1999). Mapping gender. The multifactorial approach and the organization of gender-related attributes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 485-502.
• Uleman, J. S., & Weston, M. (1986). Does the BSRI inventory sex roles? Sex roles, 15, 43-62.
• Vermunt, J. K. (1998). A general program for the analysis of categorial data. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
• Woo, M., & Oei, T. P. S. (2008). Empirical investigations of the MMPI Gender-Masculine and Gender-Feminine Scales. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 1-10.
• Wood, J. L., Heitmiller, D., Andreasen, N. C., & Nopoulos, P. (2008). Morphology of the ventral frontal cortex: Relationship to femininity and social cognition. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 534-540. (Pubitemid 351264222)
• Wong, F. Y., McCreary, D. R., & Duffy, K. G. (1990). A further validation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A multitraitmultimethod study. Sex Roles, 22, 249-259.