An approach towards the judgment rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union on September 6, 2017 regarding the European Immigration Crisis

  1. Hellman, Jacqueline 1
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

Zeitschrift:
Revista Derecho del Estado

ISSN: 0122-9893,  2346-2051

Datum der Publikation: 2020

Nummer: 46

Seiten: 85-106

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18601/01229893.N46.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista Derecho del Estado

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Migrations flows are not a brand-new phenomenon. Nonetheless, in these last years, the findings are worrying. In fact, at the end of the year 2016, a record was reached as the number of displaced people amounted to 65.6 million. In this connection, it must be stressed that the European continent has been particularly affected by this crisis. Bearing this in mind, we have to mention that some Member States of the European Union have adopted their own strategies, which -in some occasions- have deviated far from the position imposed by the mentioned international organization. At this juncture, it is relevant to examine the approach that the Court of Justice of the European Union has had in one particular case, which resulted in the long-awaited judgment rendered on September 6, 2017.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Abrisketa Uriarte y Juan Antonio. La reubicación de los refugiados: un déficit de solidaridad y una brecha en la Unión Europea. Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de 6 de septiembre de 2017, asuntos c-643 y C-64/15 Hungría y Eslovaquia contra el Consejo. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, 44, 2018.
  • Arriba-Sellier, Nathan. Welcome refugees, adieu solidarité. Public Law, 2017.
  • Bamberg, Katharina. et De Somer, Marie, Policy Update October 2017. European Policy Centre, 2, 2017.
  • Boldizsár, Nagy. Sharing the responsibility or shifting the focus? The responses of the EU and the Visegrad countries to the Post-2015 Arrival of Migrants and Refugees. IAI, 17, 2017.
  • Brsakoska B azerkosk, Julija. The refugee relocation system in EU and its implications to the countries on the Western Balkans route: the aftermath of the flawed reception conditions in the eu. La Revue des Droits de l´Homme, 13, 2018.
  • Chetail, Vicent. The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-brac or System? In Reforming the common European asylum system: the New European refugee law, Vincent,
  • Chetail, De Bruycker, Philippe and Maiani, Francesco (eds.), Brill, 2016.
  • Collet, Elizabeth et Le Coz, Camille. After the storm. Learning from the EU response to the migration crisis. Migration Policy Institute Europe, 2018.
  • Dandashly, Assem. The European Union’s response to the Syrian conflict. Too little, too late… Global Affairs, 2 (4), 2016.
  • Goig Martínez, Juan Manuel. La política común de inmigración en la Unión Europea en el sesenta aniversario de los tratados de Roma (o la historia de un fracaso). Revista de Derecho de la Unión Europea, 32, 2017.
  • González, José María Luque. Schengen. Un espacio de seguridad, libertad y justicia. Revista de Derecho, 21, 2004.
  • Guild, Elspeth et al. The 2015 Refugee Crisis in the European Union. ceps Policy Brief, 332, 2015.
  • Hellman, Jacqueline et Molina, María José. The erosion of the European integration process due to certain restrictions of the free movement of persons. Revista Universitaria Europea, 22, 2015.
  • Kogovšek Šalamon, Neza. The principle of solidarity in asylum and migration within the context of the European Union accession process. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (5), 2017.
  • Kukuk, Esin. The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibilities: More than Window Dressing? European Law Journal, 22, 2016.
  • Labayle, Henri. Solidarity is not a value: Provisional relocation of asylum-seekers confirmed by the Court of Justice (6 September 2017, Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15 Slovakia and Hungary v. Council). Asylum, European Court of Justice, Solidarity, 2017.
  • Lehne, Stefan. The eu Remains Unprepared for the Next Migration Crisis. Carnegie Europe, 3, 1-7, 2018.
  • Mangas Martín, Araceli, Territorio, integridad territorial y fronteras del Estado en la Unión Europea. Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de León, 2, 2015.
  • Martín Martínez, Magdalena. Los límites a la libre circulación de personas en la UE por razones de orden público, seguridad o salud pública en tiempos de crisis: una revaluación a la luz de la jurisprudencia del TJUE. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 18 (49), 2014.
  • Mitsilegas, Valsamis. Humanizing solidarity in European refugee law: The promise of mutual recognition. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (5), 2017.
  • Noll, Gregor. Security in a Liberal Union: eu Asylum and Migration Control Policies. In The European Union: Facing the Challenges of Multiple Security Threats, 1-21, Bakardjieva-Engelbrekt, A., A. Michalski, N. Nilsson, L. Oxelheim, United Kingdom, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
  • Obradovic, Daniela. Cases C-643 and C-645/15: Enforcing solidarity in EU migration policy. European Law blog, 2017.
  • Ovádek, Michal. Legal basis and solidarity of provisional measure in Slovakia and Hungary v. Council. European Database of Asylum Law, 2017.
  • Šabić, Šelo. The relocation of refugees in the European Union. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2017.
  • Sánchez Sánchez, Víctor. Refugiados, cautivos, esclavos y otros emigrados en el Antiguo Oriente Medio, Madrid, Tecnos, 2017.
  • Timmermans, Christiaan. The Competence Divide of the Lisbon Treaty Six Years After. In The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States, 19-33, S. Garben & I. Goavere, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2017.
  • Uçarer, Emek. Mare Nostrum or Solidarity of Inaction? European Union’s Responses to the Unfolding Refugee and Burden-Sharing Crisis. Paper prepared for Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Miami, May 4-6.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet