Desarrollos interpretativos de la filosofía de la educación en la tradición anglófonaun intento de sistematización

  1. David Luque 1
  1. 1 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
    info

    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01v5cv687

Revista:
Revista española de pedagogía

ISSN: 0034-9461,  2174-0909

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 77

Número: 272

Páginas: 67-82

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22550/REP77-1-2019-08 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de pedagogía

Resumen

La introducción del método analítico en el ámbito de la filosofía de la educación dio lugar a una primera época dorada que, una vez el propio método se encerró en sí mismo y se aisló de la realidad educativa, originó una crisis epistemológica e institucional. Las generaciones posteriores a esa primera de Israel Scheffler y R. S. Peters, a la vista de esa crisis, comenzaron un amplio y rico debate sobre cómo conducirse en adelante. En ese último escenario nace este artículo, cuyo objetivo es realizar una aproximación a las principales posturas a la hora de comprender el área. El método que se ha seguido está caracterizado por dos notas esenciales. La primera, una revisión sistemática de todos los artículos sobre filosofía de la educación de los principales autores. La segunda, un ejercicio hermenéutico que intentará componer un discurso unitario con las principales sensibilidades de todos ellos. El resultado es la identificación de cinco grupos reseñables que difieren entre sí, principalmente, en la relación que ha de mantener la filosofía de la educación con la práctica educativa y, en consecuencia, cómo ha de pensarse el propio ejercicio del filósofo de la educación. Lo que da lugar a discusión sobre si no es posible pensar todas esas posturas, más que vistas en sí mismas parcialmente, como partes integrantes de un todo que busca comprender el fenómeno educativo y lo mejora globalmente. Pues, si hay una conclusión más o menos evidente, es que no parece que vaya a existir de nuevo una perspectiva unificadora como la analítica y que es necesario una dinámica de relaciones dialógicas recíprocas como nuevo paradigma emergente.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Biesta, G. (1999). The Right to Philosophy of Education: From Critique to Deconstruction. En S. Tozer (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1998 (pp. 476-484). Urbana, Illinois: Philosophy of Education Society.
  • Biesta, G. (2011a). Introduction: What’s the Use of Philosophy of Education? En G. Biesta (Ed.). Philosophy of Education 2010 (pp. xi-xiii). Urbana, Illinois: Philosophy of Education Society.
  • Biesta, G. (2011b). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: a comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture y Society, 19 (2), 175-192.
  • Biesta, G. (2012a). Philosophy of Education for the Public Good: Five challenges and an agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44 (6), 581-593.
  • Biesta, G. (2012b). (Re)constructing the Theory and Philosophy of Education: An Introduction. En G. Biesta (Ed.). Making Sense of Education (pp. 1-4). Boston: Springer.
  • Biesta, G. (2014). Is philosophy of education a historical mistake? Connecting philosophy and education differently. Theory and Research in Education, 12 (1), 1-12.
  • Burbules, N. (1989). Issues and Trends in the Philosophy of Education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25 (3), 229-252.
  • Burbules, N. (1991). Continuity and diversity in Philosophy of Education: An Introduction. Educational Theory, 41 (3), 257-263.
  • Burbules, N. (1995). Postmodern doubt and philosophy of education. En General Session at the Philosophy of Education Society. Recuperado de http://public.callutheran.edu/~mccamb/
  • Burbules, N. (2000). Postmodernism for Analytic Philosophers of Education. Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia, 32 (3), 311-315.
  • Burbules, N. (2002a). The Dilemma of Philosophy of Education: «relevance» or critique? Educational Theory, 52 (3), 349-357.
  • Burbules, N. (2002b). Where is philosophy of education today: at the start of a new millennium or at the end of a tired old one? Philosophical Studies in Education, 33, 13-23.
  • Burbules, N. y Abowitz, K. K. (2009). A Situated Philosophy of Education. En R. D. Glass (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 2008 (pp. 268-276). Urbana, Illinois: Philosophy of Education Society.
  • Burbules, N. y Raybeck, N. (2003). Philosophy of education: Current trends. En J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1880- 1885). New York: Macmillan.
  • Chambliss, J. J. (2009). Philosophy of education today. Educational Theory, 59 (2), 233-251. Curren, R. (1999). Philosophy of Education at the Millennium. Recuperado de https://ojs.education.illinois.edu/index.php/pes/article/viewFile/2019/714 (Consultado el 12/12/2017).
  • Curren, R. (2003). Preface. En R. Curren (Ed.), A Companion to The Philosophy of Education (pp. 1-4). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Curren, R. (2005). Philosophy of Education, Ethical and Political Issues. En Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Recuperado de http://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopediasalmanacs-transcripts-and-maps/philosophyeducation-ethical-and-political-issues (Consultado el 12/12/2017).
  • Curren, R. (2007). Philosophy and the Necessity of Public Education. Philosophy Now, 63, 24- 27. Recuperado de http://www.philosophynow.org/issue63/63curren.htm (Consultado el 07/12/2016).
  • Curren, R. (2009). Analytic Philosophy. En J. Collins y N. O'Brien (Eds.), The Greenwood Dictionary of Education (p. 19). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Curren, R. (2010). Aristotle’s educational politics and the Aristotelian renaissance in philosophy of education. Oxford Review of Education, 36 (5), 543-559.
  • Curren, R. (Febrero, 2016). Historicizing Philosophy of Education: A Modest Plea for Analytic History and Philosophy of Education. Conferencia sobre la relación entre el estudio histórico y filosófico de la educación, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Curren, R. (2017). Philosophy of Education: its current trajectory and challenges. En M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (pp. 1863-1866). Singapore: Springer.
  • Curren, R. y Dorn, Ch. (2018). Patriotic education in a global age. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Curren, R. y Metzger, E. (2017). Living well now and in the future: why sustainability matters. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Curren, R., Robertson, E. y Hager, P. (2003). The Analytical Movement. En Randall Curren (Ed.), A Companion to The Philosophy of Education (pp. 176-191). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Edel, A. (1972). Analytic Philosophy of Education at the Cross-Roads. Educational Theory, 22 (2), 131-152.
  • Evers, C. W. (1993). Analytic and post-analytic philosophy of education: methodological reflec tions. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13 (2), 35-45.
  • Griffiths, M. (1997). Why teachers and philosophers need each other: philosophy and educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 27 (2), 191-202.
  • Griffiths, M. (2014). Re-thinking the relevance of philosophy of education for educational policy making. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46 (5), 546-559.
  • Masschelein, J. (2011a). Philosophy of Education. Bajo Palabra, 6, 39-40.
  • Masschelein, J. (2011b). Philosophy of Education as an Exercise in Thought: to not forget oneself when «things take their course». European Educational Research Journal, 10 (3), 356-363.
  • Masschelein, J. (2014). Pedagogue and/or philosopher? Some comments on attending, walking, talking, writing and… caving. En L. J. Waks (Ed.), Leaders in Philosophy of Education (pp. 197-210). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • McCulloch, G. (2002). «Disciplines contributing to education»? Educational studies and the disciplines. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50 (1), 100-119.
  • Peters, R. S. (1963). Ethics and Education. London: George Allen y Unwin Ltd. Richardson, W. (2002). Educational Studies in the United Kingdom, 1940-2002. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50 (1), 3-56.
  • Roberts, P. (2009). Hope in troubled times? PESA and the future of philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41 (7), 811-813.
  • Roberts, P. (2014). «It was the Best of Times, it was the Worst of Times…»: Philosophy of Education in the Contemporary World. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 34 (6), 623-634.
  • Roberts, P. y Stewart, G. (2016). Philosophy of education, dialogue and academic life in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Policy Futures in Education, 14 (2), 238-251.
  • Ruitenberg, C. (2009). Introduction: The Question of Method in Philosophy of Education. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 43 (3), 315-323.
  • Ruitenberg, C. (2014). «Play well with Others»: The engagement of philosophy of education with other educational research. Theory and Research in Education, 12 (1), 88-97.
  • Ryan, R. M., Curren, R. y Deci, E. L. (2013). What Humans Need: Flourishing in Aristotelian Philosophy and Self-Determination Theory. En A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The Best Within Us: Positive Psychology Perspectives on Eudaimonia (pp. 57-75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Scheffler, I. (1954). Toward an Analytic Philosophy of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 223-230.
  • Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge. An Introduction to Epistemology and Education. London y Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Scheffler, I. (2008). Foreword. En L. J. Waks (Ed.). Leaders in philosophy of education (pp. xi- vi).
  • Taipei: Sense Publishers. Siegel, H. (1981a). The future and purpose of Philosophy of education. Educational Theory, 31 (1), 11-15.
  • Siegel, H. (1981b). How «practical» should philosophy of education be? Educational Studies: a Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 12 (2), 125-134.
  • Siegel, H. (1983). On the obligations of the professional philosopher of education. Journal of Thought, 18 (2), 31-37.
  • Siegel, H. (2009). Introduction: Philosophy of education and Philosophy. En H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education (pp. 3-8). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Siegel, H. (2017). The Philosophy of Education and the tyranny of the Practice. En M. Spieker y K. Stojanov (Eds.), Bildungsphilosophie.Disziplin - Gegenstandsbereich - Politische Bedeutung (pp. 19-36). Deutschland: Nomos Verlagsges.
  • Smeyers, P. (2006). What philosophy can and cannot do for education. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 25 (1-2), 1-18.
  • Smeyers, P. (2010). Revisiting philosophy of education. Teoría de la Educación, 22 (1), 91-116.
  • Smeyers, P. (2011). Philosophy of… Philosophy and…: taking the conditions we find ourselves in seriously. European Educational Research journal, 10 (3), 292-303.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet