Los problemas de la justicia (solo) distributiva

  1. Francisco Blanco Brotons 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

Revue:
Ápeiron: estudios de filosofía

ISSN: 2386-5326

Année de publication: 2021

Titre de la publication: Liberalismo político

Número: 14

Pages: 279-298

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Ápeiron: estudios de filosofía

Résumé

According to an important tradition of the theory of justice, of which Rawls is probably the greatest exponent, justice is essentially a distributive issue. The concept of justice is applied in the determination of the correct distributions of goods and the injustices consist precisely in their incorrect distribution. Any claim that does not refer to distributions of goods cannot be a claim of justice. Against this way of conceiving justice, several criticisms have been raised in the last decades. In this article we will analyze those offered by Iris Marion Young, Nancy Fraser and Rainer Forst. Our objective is to advance in the development of a paradigm of justice with greater critical potential than the one of Rawls when faced with social conditions too complex to fit in the excessively simplifying categories of the only distributive perspective

Références bibliographiques

  • Abizadeh, Arash (2007). Cooperation, pervasive impact, and coercion: On the scope (not site) of distributive justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(4), 318-358.
  • Ackerman, Bruce (1980). Social justice in the liberal state. Yale University.
  • Armstrong, Chris (2009). Coercion, reciprocity, and equality beyond the state. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 297-316.
  • Bebbington, Anthony (2007). Social movements and the politicization of chronic poverty. Development and Change, 38(5), 793-818.
  • Beitz, Charles R. (1979). Political theory and international relations. Princeton University.
  • Blake, Michael (2001). Distributive justcie, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(3), 257-296.
  • Blanco Brotons, Francisco (2017). La política del marco. Reescribiendo las fronteras de la justicia. Revista de Filosofía, 42(2), 275-289.
  • Blanco Brotons, Francisco (2020a). La coerción y los límites de la justicia. Signos filosóficos, 22(43).
  • Blanco Brotons, Francisco (2020b). La prioridad de la injusticia. El giro copernicano en teoría de la justicia. Filosofía Unisinos, 21(3).
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (2001). Poder, derecho y clases sociales. Desclée de Brouwer.
  • Bufacchi, Vittorio (2012). Social injustice: Essays in political philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Butler, Judith (2008). Merely cultural. En K. Olson (Ed.), Adding insult to injury. Nancy Fraser debates her critics (42-56). Verso.
  • Caney, Simon (2008). Global distributive justice and the state. Political Studies, 56, 487-518.
  • Carens, Joseph H. (1987). Aliens and citizens: The case for open borders. The Review of Politics, 49(2), 251-273.
  • De Miguel Álvarez, Ana (2010). La articulación del feminismo y el socialismo: el conflicto clase-género. En C. Amorós Puente & A.
  • De Miguel Álvarez (Eds.), Teoría feminista: de la Ilustración a la globalización. De la Ilustración al segundo sexo (Vol. 1, pp. 297-332). Minerva.
  • Dworkin, Ronald (1981a). What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(3), 1981a, 185-246.
  • Dworkin, Ronald (1981b). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283-345.
  • Forst, Rainer (2014). Justificación y crítica. Katz.
  • Fraser, Nancy (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Polity Press.
  • Fraser, Nancy (2006). La justicia social en la era de la política de la identidad: Redistribución, reconocimiento y participación. En N.
  • Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento? Un debate filosófico-político (17-88). Morata.
  • Fraser, Nancy (2008). Heterosexism, misrecognition, and capitalism: A response to Judith Butler. En K. Olson. (Ed.), Adding insult to injury. Nancy Fraser debates her critics. Verso.
  • Fraser, Nancy (2009). El feminismo, el capitalismo y la astucia de la historia. New left review, 56, 87-104.
  • Freeman, Samuel (2006). The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights, and distributive justice. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(1), 29-68.
  • Gauthier, David (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford University Press.
  • Giddens, Anthony (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. The Macmillan Press.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1992). Teoría de la acción comunicativa II. Crítica de la razón funcionalista. Taurus.
  • Hancock, Ange-Marie (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63-79.
  • Kymlicka, Will (1995). Filosofía política contemporánea. Una introducción. Ariel.
  • Marx, Karl (2014). Carta a Arnold Ruge. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/espanol/m-e/cartas/m09-43.htm.
  • McCall, Leslie (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771-1800.
  • Miller, David (2001). Distributing Responsibilities. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(4), 453-471.
  • Miller, David (2008). National responsibility and global justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 11(4), 383-399.
  • Miller, Richard W. (2010). Globalizing justice. The ethics of poverty and power. Oxford University.
  • Nagel, Thomas (2008). El problema de la justicia global. Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo, 9(1), 169-196.
  • Nozick, Robert (1999). Anarchy, state, and utopía. Blackwell.
  • Nussbaum, Martha C. (2013). Las fronteras de la justicia. Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Paidós.
  • Pogge, Thomas (2005). La pobreza en el mundo y los derechos humanos. Paidós.
  • Rawls, John (2014). Teoría de la Justicia. Fondo de cultura económica.
  • Sangiovanni, Andrea (2007). Global justice, reciprocity, and the state. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 3-39.
  • Shapiro, Ian (1999). Democratic justice. Yale University Press. Tan, Kok-Chor (2006). The boundary of justice and the justice of boundaries: Defending global egalitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19(2), 319-344.
  • Valentini, Laura (2011). Coercion and (global) justice. The American Political Science Review, 105(1), 205-220.
  • Velasco, Juan Carlos (2016). El azar de las fronteras. Políticas migratorias, ciudadanía y justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Walby, Sylvia (2009). Globalization & inequalities. Complexity and contested modernities. SAGE.
  • Walzer, Michael (1993). Las esferas de la justicia. Una defensa del pluralismo y la igualdad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Young, Iris Marion (2000). La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Cátedra.
  • Yuval-Davis, Nira (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 2006, 193-209.
La source de données: Dialnet