¿Quién puede mentirle a un robot? Roboética e imperativo categórico

  1. Ignacio Quintanilla Navarro 1
  1. 1 Comunidad de Madrid
    info

    Comunidad de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/040scgh75

Journal:
TECHNO REVIEW: International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad

ISSN: 2695-9933

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 3

Issue: 1

Pages: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.37467/GKA-REVTECHNO.V3.1176 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: TECHNO REVIEW: International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad

Abstract

This  paper  analyzes  the  impact  of  our  new  technological  system  in  the  evolution  and  structure  of  our  ethical argumentation.Considering the possibility of the deception in the relationship human-robot, the paper discusses some of the implications  of  the  ethical  doctrines  of  Kant  and  Scheler  in  a  situation  of  human-robot  communication.  After  a  historical analysis of the relationship between technology and ethical argumentation the paper proposes an interpretation of the moral argument exposed by Kant in his essay “On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns”, published in 1979, in the context of the interaction human being-robot. The final section offers some suggestions on general roboethics.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderson, S. L. (2008). “Asimov´s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics”. Journal AI & Society - Special Issue: Ethics and artificial agents archive , 22(49), 477-493.
  • Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition . Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Floreano, D., Mitri, S., Magnenat, S., Keller, L. (2007). “Evolutionary conditions for the emergence of communication in robots”. Current Biology 17(6), 514-9.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we Became Posthuman, virtual bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1990) [1817]. Enciclopedia de las ciencias filosóficas. Trad. Francisco Larroyo. México: Porrúa.
  • Kahn, P. H., et al. (2012). “Do people Hold a Humanoid Robot Morally Accountable for the Harm it Causes?”, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction . ACM, Nueva York, 33-40.
  • Kang, M. (2011). Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kant, I. (1956) [1785]. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres ). Wiesbaden: Suhrkamp.
  • Kant, I. (1797) “Sobre un presunto derecho de mentir por filantropía” (Trad. Juan Miguel Palacios). En Teoría y práctica. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Lin, P., et al. (2012). Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics . Cambridge MA: MIT.
  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue . Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Mitcham, C. y Duval, R.S. (2000). Engineer’s Toolkit: Engineering Ethics . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Moon, A., et al. (2012). “Open Roboethics: Establishing an Online Community for Accelerated Policy and Design Change”, Proceedings of We Robot 2012 . Miami: Miami University Press.
  • Palacios, J.M. (2008). Bondad moral e inteligencia ética. Madrid: Encuentro.
  • Paton, H. J. (1971). The Categorical Imperative; a study in Kant's moral philosophy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Popper, K. R. (1994) [1987]. Sociedad Abierta, universo abierto . Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Powers, T. M. (2011). “Prospects for a Kantian Machine”. Machine Ethics . En Anderson, M. y Anderson, S. (eds). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Quintanilla, I. (2006). “El cambio tecnológico: cuatro apuntes desde la filosofía”, Empresa y Humanismo, IX, 141-164.
  • Quintanilla, I. (2012). Techné. La filosofía y el sentido de la técnica. Madrid: Common Ground Publishing.
  • Scheler, M. (2004) [1923]. Esencia y formas de la simpatía . Trad. José Gaos. Buenos Aires: Losada.
  • Simon, H. A. (1968). The Sciences of the Artificial . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Veruggio, G. (2005). “The Birth of Roboethics”, IEEE- ICRA,Workshop on Roboethics, 1-4.
  • Veruggio G. y Operto F. (2010). “Ethical and societal guidelines for Robotics”. En Gerhard Dabringer (ed.), Ethical and Legal Aspects of Unmanned Systems. Viena: Austrian Ministry of Defence and Sports.
  • Wagner, A. R. y Atkin R. C. (2010). Robot deception: Recognizing when a Robot Should Deceive. Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Data source: Dialnet