Inter-firm power relations and working conditions under new production models

  1. Rísquez, Mario 1
  2. Paz, María J 3
  3. Ruiz-Gálvez, María E 2
  1. 1 Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
  2. 2 Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain
  3. 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
The Economic and Labour Relations Review

ISSN: 1035-3046,  1838-2673

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Alea: 31

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 138-157

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1177/1035304620982705 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: The Economic and Labour Relations Review

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

In investigating recent changes to the automotive industry production process, such as modularisation, our work emphasises the process of fragmentation of production as a configuring element of inter-firm power relationships, and as an explanatory element in working conditions. From a theoretical framework focused on power relations, we analyse by way of a selected case study how the capabilities of companies and their network positions, together with the agency of labour, shape the power relations that influence the evolution of working conditions. The study does indeed find relevant changes to inter-firm relationships, for example, within networks of assemblers and suppliers, but without a consequent re-balancing of power. This finding serves to explain differences in the evolution of working conditions between distinct companies, these conditions being fully functional to a strategy for profitability and thus difficult to reverse. JEL Codes: J31, L14, L62

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • 10.1177/09500170022118400
  • 10.1007/978-1-137-41036-8_7
  • Boyer R, (2000), The Productive Models: The Conditions of Profitability
  • 10.14452/MR-026-03-1974-07_1
  • CEPROSS, (2016), Observatorio de Enfermedades Profesionales y de Enfermedades Causadas o Agravadas por el Trabajo
  • 10.1093/jeg/lbn002
  • Coriat B, (1991), Penser à l’envers. Travail et organisation dans la firm japonaise
  • 10.1093/jeg/lbn008
  • 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00602.x
  • Durand JP, (2009), La chaîne invisible: travailler aujourd’hui: flux tendu et servitude volontaire
  • Fine CH, (1998), Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage
  • 10.1177/0022185615574271
  • Gereffi G, (1994), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism
  • 10.1080/09692290500049805
  • 10.1080/03085140802172656
  • 10.1093/cje/bei088
  • 10.1080/09692290210150842
  • 10.1177/103530469700800202
  • 10.1111/bjir.12015
  • 10.1177/0959680118782364
  • 10.1177/0022185615582241
  • 10.1108/JMTM-02-2020-0057
  • 10.4337/9781788113779.00013
  • 10.4337/9781788113779.00031
  • 10.1177/1035304615615513
  • Rubery J, (2007), Économies et Sociétés, 28, pp. 941
  • 10.1007/978-1-137-10224-9
  • 10.1046/j.1467-6419.2003.00209.x
  • 10.1179/1024529412Z.00000000026
  • Sturgeon TJ, (2011), Mapping Global Value Chains: Intermediate Goods Trade and Structural Change in the World Economy
  • 10.1057/ejis.1995.9
  • Yin RK, (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods