"Clitemnestra" mejor que "Clitemestra"
ISSN: 0213-7674, 1989-4619
Année de publication: 2001
Número: 16
Pages: 5-32
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Myrtia: revista de filología clásica
Résumé
In this paper the arguments are minutely examined which in the XIXth and XXth centuries have been alleged and maintained by a great number of scholars, some favouring the spelling 'Clytaemestra' without -n-, the others, on the contrary, the spelling 'Clytaemnestra' with -n-. The author proves that the latter spelling, vid. the one with -n-, is largely preferable.