Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities

  1. Solé Ollé, Albert
  2. Hortas Rico, Miriam
Revista:
Documentos de trabajo ( XREAP )

Año de publicación: 2008

Número: 10

Tipo: Documento de Trabajo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Resumen

This paper examines the impact of urban sprawl, a phenomenon of particular interest in Spain, which is currently experiencing this process of rapid, low-density urban expansion. Many adverse consequences are attributed to urban sprawl (e.g., traffic congestion, air pollution and social segregation), though here we are concerned primarily with the rising costs of providing local public services. Our initial aim is to develop an accurate measure of urban sprawl so that we might empirically test its impact on municipal budgets. Then, we undertake an empirical analysis using a cross-sectional data set of 2,500 Spanish municipalities for the year 2003 and a piecewise linear function to account for the potentially nonlinear relationship between sprawl and local costs. The estimations derived from the expenditure equations for both aggregate and six disaggregated spending categories indicate that low-density development patterns lead to greater provision costs of local public services.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bergstrom, T. and Goodman, R. (1973): “Private demand for public goods”, American Economic Review 63, 280-296.
  • Borcheding, T. and Deacon, R. (1972): “The demand for the services of non-federal governments”, American Economic Review 62, 891-906.
  • Brueckner, J.K. (2000): “Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies”, International Regional Science Review 23, 160-171.
  • Brueckner, J.K. (2001): “Urban Sprawl: Lessons from Urban Economics”, in: Gale, W.G., Pack, J.R. (Ed.): Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, pp. 65-89. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Brueckner, J.K. (2001b): “Property Taxation and Urban Sprawl”, in Wallace E.Oates (Ed): Property Taxation and Local Government Finance, pp.153-172. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Brueckner, J.K. and Kim, H. (2003): “Urban Sprawl and the Property Tax”, International Tax and Public Finance 10, 5-23.
  • Brueckner, J.K. and Largey, A.G. (2006): “Social Interaction and Urban Sprawl”, Working Paper No.60707, University of Irvine-California.
  • Burchell, R. et al (1998): “The Costs of Sprawl. Revisited”, Transportation Cooperative Research Program Report 39. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Burchell, R. et al (2002): “Costs of Sprawl – 2000”, Transportation Cooperative Research Program Report 74. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Burchell, R. and Mukhjerji, S. (2003): “Conventional Development versus Managed Growth: The Costs of Sprawl”, American Journal of Public Health, 93 (9), 1534-1540.
  • Burchfield, M., Overman, H. and Turner, M. (2006): “Causes of Sprawl: A Portrait from the Space”, The Quaterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 587-633.
  • Carruthers, J.I. (2002): “The impacts of state growth management programmes: a comparative analysis”, Urban Studies, volume 39 (11), 1956-1982.
  • Carruthers, J.I. and Ulfarsson, G.F. (2002): “Fragmentation and Sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis”, Growth and Change 33, 312-340.
  • Carruthers, J.I. and Ulfarsson, G.F. (2003): “Urban sprawl and the cost of public services”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30, 503-522.
  • Carruthers, J.I. and Ulfarsson, G.F. (2006): “Does Smart Growth Matter to Public Finance? Evidence from the United States”, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, PD&R Working paper # REP 06-02.
  • Dahlberg, M.; Mork, E.; Rattso, J. and Agren, H. (2006): “Using a discontinuous grant rule to identify the effects of grants on local taxes and spending”, CESifo Working Paper No.1857.
  • Downs, A. (1998): “The Big Picture. How America’s Cities Are Growing”, Brookings Review, 16 (4).
  • Downs, A. (1999): “Some realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline”, Housing Policy Debate 10 (4), 955-974.
  • Elis-Williams, D.G. (1987): “The effect of spatial population distribution on the cost of delivering local services”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 150 (2), 152-166.
  • European Environmental Agency (2006): Urban Sprawl in Europe: The ignored Challenge, EEA Report No.10/2006.
  • Ewing, R. (1997): “Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?”, Journal of American Planning Association 63, 107-126.
  • Galster, G.; Hanson, R.; Ratcliffe, M. and Wolman, H. (2001): “Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept”, Housing Policy Debate 12 (4), 681-717.
  • Glaeser, E.L. and Kahn, M.E. (2004): “Sprawl and Urban Growth”, in Henderson, J.V. and Thisse, J.F. (Eds): Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, volume IV , pp.2498-2527. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W. (1997): “Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?”, Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1), 95-106.
  • Henderson, V. and Mitra, A. (1996): “The New Urban Landscape Developers and Edge Cities”, Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, 613-643.
  • Kahn, M. (2000): “The Environmental Impact of Suburbanization”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 (4), 569-586.
  • Katz, B. (2002): “Smart Growth: The Future of the American Metropolis?”, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion paper 58, London School of Economics.
  • Ladd, H.F. (1992): “Population Growth, Density and the Costs of Providing Public Services”, Urban Studies 29 (2), 273-295.
  • Ladd, H.F. (1994): “Fiscal impacts of local population growth: A conceptual and empirical analysis”, Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, 661-686.
  • Ladd, H.F. and Yinger, J. (1989): America´s ailing cities: Fiscal health and the design of urban policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • McGuire, T.J. and Sjoquist, D.L. (2002): “Urban Sprawl and the Finances of State and Local Governments”, in State and Local Finances Under Pressure, Edward Elgar.
  • Mieszkowski, P. and Mills, E.S. (1993): “The causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3), 135-147.
  • Muñiz, I., García, M.A. and Calatayud, D. (2006): “Sprawl. Definición, causas y efectos”, Working Paper 06.03, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  • Nechyba, T. and Walsh, R. (2004): “Urban Sprawl”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (4), 177-200.
  • Nelson, A.; Duncan, J.; Mullen, C. and Bishop, K. (1995): Growth management: Principles and practices. Chicago IL: Planners Press, APA.
  • Ministerio de Fomento (2006): Cambios de ocupación del suelo en España. Implicaciones para la sostenibilidad. Estudio realizado a partir del proyecto Corine Land Cover. Madrid: Mundi Prensa. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España
  • Pendall, R. (1999): “ Do land use controls cause sprawl?”, Environment and Planning B 26, 555-571.
  • Sierra Club (1998): Sprawl: The dark Side of the American Dream, Sierra Club Sprawl Report.
  • Sierra Club (2000): Sprawl costs us all. How your taxes fuel suburban sprawl, Sierra Club Sprawl Report.
  • Solé-Ollé, A. (2001): “Determinantes del gasto público local: ¿necesidades de gasto o capacidad fiscal?”, Revista de Economía Aplicada 25, 115-156.
  • Solé-Ollé, A. and Bosch, N. (2005): “On the relationship between authority size and the costs of providing local services: lessons for the design of intergovernmental transfers in Spain”, Public Finance Review 33 (3), 343-384.
  • Solé-Ollé, A. (2006): “Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions. Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain”, Journal of Urban Economics 59, 32-53.
  • Song, Y. and Zenou, Y. (2005): “Property Tax and Urban Sprawl. Theory and Implications for U.S. Cities”, The Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Working Paper No.648.
  • Speir, C. and Stephenson, K. (2002): “Does sprawl cost us all? Isolating the effects of housing patterns on public water and sewer costs”, Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (1), 56-70.
  • Torrens, P and Alberti, M. (2000): “Measuring Sprawl”, Working Paper Series No.27, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet