Una interpretación del débil crecimiento de la economía alemana en el período 1995-2007

  1. Víctor Luque
  2. Enrique Palazuelos
Revue:
Revista de economía mundial

ISSN: 1576-0162

Année de publication: 2015

Número: 41

Pages: 159-180

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openArias Montano editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de economía mundial

Résumé

This paper examines the characteristics of the processes of the productive transformation and slow growth which Germany went through between 1995 and 2007 by analysing a set of variables which connect the evolution of demand and the income distribution with productive structure. The analysis combines the study of aggregate economic behaviour to the disaggregated study of groups pertaining to productive branches. In this manner it is possible to observe large differences in almost all the analysed variables, which exist between evolution of the most technology-intensive manufactures and the rest of the branches. This analysis allows us to formulate an explanation of the way in which German economy went through a profound productive transformation and a slow growth process simultaneously, during the period preceding the global financial crisis.

Références bibliographiques

  • Bach, S., Corneo, G. y Steiner, V. (2009): “From Bottom to Top: The Entire Distribution of Market Income in Germany, 1992-2003”, Review of Income and Wealth 55(2), 303-330.
  • Belitz, H.., Clemes, M., y Gornig, M. (2009): “Germany’s Technological Special-ization Assures Growth Opportunities”, Weekly Report, German Institut for Economic Research, 5, Berlín.
  • Bhaduri, A., Marglin, S. (1990): “Unemployment and the real wage: the eco-nomic basis for contesting political ideologies”, Cambridge Journal of Eco-nomics, 14, 375-393.
  • Bibow, J. (2012): “The Euro Debt Crisis and Germany’s Euro Trilemma”, Work-ing Paper 721, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
  • Bispinck, R. y Schulten, T. (2012): “Collectively agreed wages in Germany”, KU Leuven, Lovaina.
  • Bricall, J. M. y De Juan, O. (1999): Economía política del crecimiento, fluctuaciones y crisis, Ariel, Barcelona.
  • Cesaratto, S. (2012): “La crisis sin fin de la eurozona: una visión clásica-kaleckiana”, Revista papeles, 120, 69-88.
  • De Juan, O. (2012): Economía: Fundamentos y claves de interpretación, Pirámide, Madrid.
  • Dullien, S. (2013): “A German model for europe?”, Policy Brief, European Council on Foreing Relations.
  • Dünhaupt, P. (2010): “Financialization and the rentier income share - evidence from the USA and Germany”, Working paper 2-2010, Macroeconomic Policy Institute, Düsseldorf.
  • Dünhaupt, P. (2012): “Financialization and the Rentier Income Share - Evidence from the USA and Germany.” International Review of Applied Economics, 26(4), 465-87.
  • Garz, M. (2013): “Empleo y salarios en Alemania tras la desreglamentación del trabajo temporal por agencia en 2004”, Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 132, (2), 345-366.
  • Hein, E. (2012): “Finance-dominated capitalism, re-distribution household debt and financial fragility in a Kaleckian distribution and growth model”, PSL Quarterly Review, 65 (260), 11-51.
  • Hein, E. (2013): “Finance-dominated Capitalism and Redistribution of Income: A Kaleckian Perspective”, Working paper 746, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
  • Kaldor, N. (1956): “Alternative Theories of Distribution”, Review of Economic Studies, 23 (2), 83-100.
  • Kalecki, M. (1954): Theory of economic dynamics. An essay on cyclical and long-run changes in capitalist economy. Allen and Unwin, Londres.
  • Kalecki, M. (1965): Theory of Economic Dynamics, Allen & Unwin, Londres.
  • Kemmerling, A. y Bruttel, O. (2006): "‘New politics’ in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state”, Discussion paper 2005, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
  • Lapavitsas, C., A. Kaltenbrunner, A. et al. (2012): “Empobreciéndote a ti y a tu vecino”, Crisis en la Eurozona, 29 -108. Capitán Swing, Madrid.
  • Lavoie, M. (1992): Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis, Edward Elgar Northampton.
  • Lavoie, M., Stockhammer, E. (2012): “Wage-led Growth: Concept, Theories and Policies”, Conditions of Work and employment series 41, International Labour Office.
  • Ministerio Federal de Economía y Teconología (2010): “General Economic Policy, Industrial PolicyIn focus: Germany as a competitive industrial nation. Building on strengths - Overcoming weaknesses - Securing the future”, Berlin.
  • Palazuelos, E. y Fernández, R. (2007): “Demand, employment, and labour productivity in the European economies”, en Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, 1-15.
  • Robinson, J. (1970): “Model of accumulation”, en Sen, A., Growth economics. Penguin Books, Londres.
  • Robinson, J. (1966): “Kalecki and Keynes”, en Economic Dynamics and Planning. Essays in honour of Michal Kalecki. Pergamon, Oxford, 335-341.
  • Setterfield, M. (2005): La economía del crecimiento dirigido por la demanda, Akal. Madrid.
  • Stockhammer, E y Stehrer, R. (2009): “Goodwin or Kalecki in Demand? Functional Income Distribution and Aggregate Demand in the Short Run” en Working paper series of the Political Economy Research Institute, 203.
  • Stockhammer, E. y Onaran, Ö. (2012): “Wage-led growth: Theory, Evidence, Policy” en Working paper series of the Political Economy Research Institute, 300.
  • Weihrich, H (1999): “Analyzing The Competitive Advantages And Disadvantages Of Germany With The Tows Matrix-An Alternative To Porter’s Model”, en European Business Review, 99, 9 - 22.
La source de données: Dialnet