Sobre la interpretación del sujeto nulo de los complementos de infinitivo

Referencias bibliográficas

• Boland, J. E. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1991). The role of lexical representations in sentence processing. En G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 331-366). Amsterdam: North Holland.
• Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Garnsey, S. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 413-432.
• Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
• Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
• Clifton, C. Jr. & Frazier, L. (1986). The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 209-224.
• Coulson, S., King, J. & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
• Demestre, J. (2003). Procesamiento de frases e información léxica. Tesis Doctoral. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. (http://www.tdx.cesca.es/TDX-0325104-124559).
• Demestre, J. & García-Albea, J. E. (2007). ERP evidence for the rapid assignment of an (appropriate) antecedent to PRO. Cognitive Science, 31 (2), 343-354.
• Demestre, J., Meltzer, S., García-Albea, J. E. & Vigil, A. (1999). Identifying the null subject: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28 (3), 293-312.
• Fernández Lagunilla, M. & Anula, A. (1995). Sintaxis y cognición. Introducción al conocimiento, el procesamiento y los déficits sintácticos. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Ferreira, F. & Clifton, C. Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
• Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155-209.
• Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. En M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Frazier, L. (1990). Exploring the architecture of the language-processing system. En G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 409-433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Frazier, L., Clifton, C.Jr. & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 13, 187-222.
• Garnsey, S. M. (1993). Event-related potentials in the study of language: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 337-356.
• Haegeman, L. (1993). Introduction to Government & Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. En C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hillyard, S.A. & Picton, T.W. (1987). Electrophysiology of cognition. En F Plum (Ed.), Handbook of physiology: Higher functions of the nervous system: Section 1: Neurophysiology (pp. 519-584). New York: American Physiological Society.
• MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994a). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
• MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994b). Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution. En C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 123-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Manzini, R. (1983). On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 421-46.
• Nicol, J. (1988). Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Tesis doctoral no publicada, MIT.
• Nicol, J., Fodor, J. D. & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1229-1238.
• Nicol, J. & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18 (1), 5-19.
• Nicol, J.L. & Swinney, D.A. (1999). The psycholinguistics of anaphora. En A. Barss (Ed.), Anaphora: a reference guide (pp. 72-104). Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain responses to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language, 59, 494-522.
• Osterhout, L. & Mobley, L.A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
• Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
• Trueswell, J.C. & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. En C. Clifton, L. Frazier y K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.