Libertad formal frente a libertad posesiva y libertad comunallos tres conceptos de la libertad de Isaiah Berlin

  1. Schwartz, Pedro
Revista:
Telos: Revista iberoamericana de estudios utilitaristas

ISSN: 1132-0877 2255-596X

Any de publicació: 2010

Títol de l'exemplar: Homenaje Internacional a Esperanza Guisán (Parte I)

Volum: 17

Número: 2

Pàgines: 41-53

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Telos: Revista iberoamericana de estudios utilitaristas

Resum

This paper aims to clarify and defend the distinction by Isaiah Berlin between “negative liberty” on the one hand, and “positive” and “communal liberty” on the other. This distinction has been attacked by those who believe it breaks the necessary harmony with equality or fraternity, virtues that many progressive authors place on the same plane as freedom. Instead of speaking of “negative liberty,” as proposed by Berlin, we propose to call it “classical” or “formal” liberty. In turn, rather than speaking of “positive” liberty, we propose to say “possessive liberty” and “communal liberty.” Thus, Isaiah Berlin should have spoken of three concepts of liberty and have stressed that the latter two may be destructive of the first. Possessive and communal liberty can be significant aspects of a society, but should not be confused with personal liberty. The promotion of possessive and communal liberty is often accompanied by invasions of formal liberty.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Berlin, Isaiah (1958): “Two Concepts of Liberty”, en Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press.
  • Byron, George Gordon, 6th Baron – (1818): Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage. John Murray, Londres.
  • Constitución española (1978).
  • Friedman, Milton y Friedman, Rose (1979.1980): Free to Choose. Secker and Warburg. Londres.
  • Hobbes, Thomas (1651, 1972): Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. Penguin Classics, Aylesbury.
  • Mill, John Stuart (1861, 1977): Considerations on Representative Government. Reeditado en The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. XIX, Essays on Politics and Society. University of Toronto Press.
  • Pérez Galdós, Benito (1875, 1976): Cádiz. Nº 8 de los Episodios nacionales. Alianza Editorial, Madrid.
  • Popper, Karl R. (1957, 1961): La miseria del historicismo. Trad. Pedro Schwartz. Taurus, Madrid.
  • Rawls, John (1972): A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.
  • Rawls, John (1993): Political Liberalism. The John Dewey Essays in Philosophy, 4. Columbia University Press, Nueva York.
  • Roepke, Walter (1959): “The Economic Necessity of Freedom”, en Modern Age, vol. 2, nº 3 (Verano).
  • Sen, Amartya (1991, 2002): “Processes, Liberty and Rights”, segunda lección “Arrow”, en Sen (2002), q.v.
  • Sen, Amartya (1992, 1995): Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Trad. Ana Bravo y Pedro Schwartz. Alianza Editorial. Madrid.
  • Sen, Amartya (2002): Rationality and Freedom. Harvard University Press.
  • Urrutia, Juan (2005): La mirada del economista. Biografía intelectual de un filósofo mundano de los 90. Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.
  • Wegner, Gerhard (2008): Political Failure by Agreement. Learning Liberalism and the Welfare State. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham.