Abduction in Observational and in Theoretical Sciences. Some Examples of IBE in Palaeontology and in Cosmology
ISSN: 0034-8244, 1988-284X
Year of publication: 2015
Issue: 40
Pages: 143-152
Type: Article
More publications in: Revista de filosofía
Abstract
Contrary to the view maintained by many philosophers that science employs the deductive testing of hypotheses, observational natural sciences such as paleoanthropology and the earth sciences apply a scientific methodology consisting in the proposal of hypotheses which are best fitted to the available empirical data, i.e. which best explain the data. Observational natural sciences are predominantly empirical. They are grounded in observation, and they do not implement any Popperian deductive testing of hypotheses. Theoretical natural sciences such as mathematical physics also apply inference to the best explanation for the introduction of significant concepts and hypotheses. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that in contemporary science, the use of abductive reasoning continues to be as effective as ever.
Bibliographic References
- ALISEDA, A. (2006): Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation. Dordrecht: Springer
- ALISEDA, A. (2014): La lógica como herramienta de la razón. Razonamiento ampliativo en la creatividad, la cognición y la inferencia. Cuadernos de Lógica, Epistemología y Leguaje, Vol. 6. College Publications. Milton Keynes, Reino Unido.
- ARSUAGA, J. L. y MARTÍNEZ, I. (2006): La especie elegida. La larga marcha de la evolución humana. Madrid: Temas de Hoy
- ARSUAGA, J. L. (2013): “Los otros”. El País. Sociedad, December 4th. ARSUAGA, J. L.; MARTÍNEZ, I.; BERMÚDEZ DE CASTRO, J. M; CARBONELL, E.;
- GRACIA, A.; MEYER, M.; PÄÄBO, S. (et al.) (2013): “A mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos”, Nature, vol. 504, Letter.
- CALLAWAY, E. (2013): “Hominin DNA baffles experts. Analysis of oldest sequence from a human ancestor suggests link to mystery population”. Nature, vol. 504
- LORENZO, C. (2005): “Primeros homínidos. Géneros y especies”. In Eudald Carbonell (ed.), Homínidos: Las primeras ocupaciones de los continentes. Barcelona: Ariel
- HANSON, N. R. (1958): Patterns of Discovery. An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: University Press
- HARMAN, G. (1965): “The Inference to the Best Explanation”. The Philosophical Review, vol. 74, No. 1: 88-95
- HERNÁNDEZ ANTÓN, I.; NEPOMUCENO, A. y SARRIÓN, E. (2012): “La inferencia relativa al contexto” En L. Fernández, F. J. Salguero y C. Barés (eds.), Ensayos sobre Lógica, Lenguaje, Mente y Ciencia. Sevilla: Ediciones Alfar
- PÄÄBO, S. et al. (2006): “Sequencing and Analysis of Neanderthal Genomic DNA”, Science, Vol. 314
- PEIRCE, C. S. (1965): Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press RIVADULLA, A. (2003): Revoluciones en Física. Madrid: Trotta
- RIVADULLA, A. (2008): “Discovery Practices in Natural Sciences: From Analogy to Preduction”. Revista de Filosofía, Vol. 33: 117-137
- RIVADULLA, A. (2010): “Complementary Strategies in Scientific Discovery: Abduction and Preduction”. In Bergman, M.; Paavola, S.; Pietarinen, A.-V. & Rydenfelt, H. (Eds.), Ideas in Action. Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, 241-253.
- RIVADULLA, A. (2015): Meta, Método y Mito en Ciencia. Madrid: Trotta.
- SMOLIN, L. (2007), The Trouble with Physics. The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
- THAGARD, P. R. (1978): “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice”. The Journal of Philosophy, vol 75, Nº 2: 76-92.