El valor narrativo de la comunicación en la danza contemporánea"habitus", musicalidad y emoción

  1. Dafne Muntanyola 1
  2. Simone Belli 2
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

  2. 2 Universidad Yachay Tech
    info

    Universidad Yachay Tech

    Urcuquí, Ecuador

    ROR https://ror.org/04jjswc10

Journal:
Revista de antropología social

ISSN: 1131-558X,  1988-2831

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 25

Issue: 1

Pages: 133-151

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/REV_RASO.2016.V25.N1.52628 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de antropología social

Abstract

The richness of dance comes from the need to work with an individual body. Still, the body of the dancer belongs to plural context, crossed by artistic and social traditions, which locate the artists in a given field. We claim that role conflict is an essential component of the structure of collective artistic creativity. We address the production of discourse in a British dance company, with data that spawns from the ethnography ‘Dance and Cognition’, directed by David Kirsh at the University of California, together with WayneMcGregor-Random Dance. Our Critical Discourse Analysis is based on multiple interviews to the dancers and choreographer. Our findings show how creativity in dance seems to be empirically observable, and thus embodied and distributed shaped by the dance habitus of the particular social context.

Bibliographic References

  • Austin, John (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Barab, Sasha; Hay, Kenneth; Yamagata-Lynch, Lisa (2001). “Constructing Networks of Action - Relevant Episodes: An In Situ Research Mehodology”. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10: 63-112.
  • Becker, Howard (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Becker, Howard; Faulkner, Robert; Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara (2006). Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, Writing, and Other Improvisations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1967). “Systems of Education and Systems of Thought”. International Social Science Journal, 19(3): 367-388.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1991 [1980]) El sentido práctico. Madrid: Taurus.
  • D’Andrade, Roy (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Debord, Guy (1967). La Société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet Chastel.
  • Dreyfus, Hubert; Dreyfus, Stuart (1986). Mind over Machine. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Dreyfus, Hubert (1996). “The Current Relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Embodiment” in Honi Haber & Gail Weiss (Eds.). Perspectives on Embodiment. New York: Routledge.
  • Gabrielsson, Alf; Bradbury, Rod (2011). Strong experiences with music. Cambridge: Oxford UP.
  • Gallagher, Shaun (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Gallagher, Shaun; Ramsoy, Thomas (2006). “Shaun Gallagher interviewed by Thomas Ramsøy: How the body shapes the mind”. Science and Consciousness Review, 45(1).
  • Garfinkel, Harvey (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Los Angeles: Polity Press.
  • Garfinkel, Harvey (2006). Seeing Sociologically. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Giere, Ronald; Moffat, Beatrice (2003). “Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge”. Social Studies of Science, 33(2): 1-10.
  • Goffman, Erving (1969). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
  • Goffman, Erving (1983). “Presidential address: The interaction order”. American Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1–17.
  • Haré, Rom (1989). “Language and science of psychology”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour and Personality, 4:165-188.
  • Kirsh, David; Muntanyola, Dafne; Lew, Amy; Jao, Joanne; Sugihara, Matt (2009). “Choreographic methods for creating novel, high quality dance”. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement 2009 Conference Proceedings, 188-195.
  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1999). Epistemic Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Le Breton, David (1990). Antropología del cuerpo y modernidad. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
  • Lozares, Carlos (2007). Interacción, redes sociales y ciencias cognitivas. Granada: Comares.
  • Massey, Doreen (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
  • Menin, Damiano; Schiavio, Andrea (2012). “Rethinking Musical Affordances”, AVANT, 3.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York: The Humanities Press.
  • Meunier, Fanny (2010). “Learner Corpora and English Language Teaching: Checkup Time”. Anglistik International Journal of English Studies, 21(1): 209-220.
  • Muntanyola. D. (2010). “Danza y cognición: el proceso de creación coreográfica”, en Noya, J., Del Val F. y Pérez M. (Eds.) Musyca: Musica. Sociedad y creatividad artística. Biblioteca Nueva: Madrid.
  • Muntanyola, Dafne; Belli, Simone (2014). “Emociones y música en movimiento. Discursos cruzados en una compañia de danza”. Trans, 18: 1-27.
  • Murphy, Kevin (2004). “Imagination As Joint Activity: The Case Of Architectural Interaction”. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(4): 267-278.
  • Noe, Alva (2005). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Noice, Tony; Noice, Helga (1997). The Nature Of Expertise On Professional Acting: A Cognitive View. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pelinski, Ramon (2005). “Corporeidad y experiencia musical”. TRANS, 9.
  • Rogers, Yvonne (2006). “Distributed Cognition and Communication”. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistic. Edited by Keith Brown Elsevier: Oxford. 181-202.
  • Thrift, Nigel (2006). “Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist commodification”. Economy and Society, 35(02): 279-306.
  • Todes, Samuel (2001). Body and World. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Yeats, William Butler (1928). Among School Children. London: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Wodak, Ruth; Meyer, Michael (2003). Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Data source: Dialnet