Etnografia cognitiva delle interazioni medichemedici e infermieri prendono decisioni

  1. Dafne Muntanyola Saura
  2. Simone Belli
Revista:
Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

ISSN: 1578-8946

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 16

Número: 2

Páginas: 67-87

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1563 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

Resumen

The debate on medical decision-making needs naturalistic studies such as the cognitive ethnography we present here. This paper claims the needs to move from the taken for granted theory of mind to an empirical level. Following recent microsociological and cognitive science studies, we understand knowledge as the product of interaction within a working medical team. Thus, we propose a distributed and embodied cognition approach to expert knowledge. We offer examples of Activity Recurrent Episodes or ARE as our minimal unit of analysis and analyze them in medical narratives in detail. We claim that qualitative analysis helps us explain how decisionmaking really works. Finally, we pinpoint at the invisibility of the patient, which is part of the medical setting but is clearly objectified in the communicative relationships that link the doctors and nurses.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alac, Morana (2005). From Trash to Treasure: Learning About Brain Images Through Multimodality. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 177-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.177
  • Antaki, Charles (2013). Applying Conversation Analysis to the communication between medical personnel and patients. Salute e Società, 1, 225-228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/SES2013-001016EN
  • Barab, Sash; Hay, Kenneth &Yamagata-Lynch, Lisa (2001). Constructing Networks of ActionRelevant Episodes: An In Situ Research Mehodology, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 63-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls10-12_5
  • Becker, Howard (1961). Boys in White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cicourel, Aaron (2006). The Interaction of Discourse, Cognition and Culture. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 25-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059547
  • Cicourel, Aaron (2006). Cogntive/Affective Processes, Social Interaction, and Social Structure as Representational Re-Descriptions: Their Contrastive Bandwidths and Spatio-Temporal Foc. Mind and Society, 5, 39-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0008-0
  • Clark, Andy (2008). Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clarke, Eric (2004). Empirical Methods in the Study of Performance. In Eric Clarke (Ed.), Empirical Musicology: Aims, Methods, Prospects (pp. 92-109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, Harry (1994). Dissecting Surgery: Forms of Life Depersonalized. Social Studies of Science, 24, 311-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400205
  • D’Andrade, Roy (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139166645
  • Franzosi, Roberto (2004). From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibbs, Raymond (2006). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge UP.
  • Giere, Ronald (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Giere, Ronald, & Moffat, Barton (2003). Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge. Social Studies of Science, 33(2), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03063127030332017
  • Hirschauer, Stephen (1991). The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery. Social Studies of Science, 21, 279-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631291021002005
  • Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Hutchins, Edwin (2006). Imagining the Cognitive Life of Things. Cambridge: McDonald Institute, Cambridge University.
  • Kirsh, David (1995). The Intelligent Use of Space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-u
  • Kirsh, David & Maglio, Paul (1992). Perceptive Actions in Tetris. In Robert Simmons (Chair). Proceedings of the AAI Spring Symposium on Control of selective perception (pp. 513-549). Stanford: Stanford University. March 1992.
  • Kirsh, David, & Maglio, Paul (1994). On Distinguishing Epistemic From Pragmatic Action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1999). Epistemic Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469540510366641
  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin (2010). The Epistemics of Information: A Logic of Knowledge Consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(2), 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469540510366641
  • Lave, Jane, & Wenger, Edmund (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lozares, Carlos (2007). Interacción, redes sociales y ciencias cognitivas. Granada: Comares.
  • Luhrmann, Tanya (2001). Of Two Minds. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2005). Chercheurs en interaction. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
  • Mondada, Lorenza (2008). Using video for sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum of Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung, 9, 3. Retrieved from: http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1161
  • Montgomery, Margaret (2006). How Doctors Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne (2008) Un nou model integrat del procés cognitiu expert: el cas d’una unitat hospitalària. Tesis doctoral. Electronic Publication, TESEO, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  • Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne (2010). Conocimiento experto y etnografía audiovisual: una propuesta teóricometodológica. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales 20, 109-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/empiria.20.2010.2042
  • Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne (2012) Expert Knowledge And Video Aided Ethnography: A Methodological Account. Révue de Synthèse, 4(133), 75-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11873-012-0176-x
  • Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne. 2014. A cognitive account of expertise: Why Rational Choice Theory is (often) a fiction. Theory & Psychology 24:19-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354313513510
  • Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne, Kirsh, David (2010). Marking as Physical Thinking: A cognitive ethnography of dance. Proceedings of the IWCogSc-10 ILCLI, Donosti, 339-355.
  • Murphy, Keith (2004). Imagination As Joint Activity: The Case Of Architectural Interaction. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(4), 267-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1104_3
  • Myers, Natasha (2008). Molecular Embodiment and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38(2), 163-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312707082969
  • Norman, Daniel (1988). The Design Of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
  • Peneff, Jean (1997). Le travail du chirurgien: les opérations à cœur ouvert. Sociologie du travail, 39(3), 265-296.
  • Timmermans, Stefan (2013). Seven warrants for qualitative health sociology. Social Science & Medicine, 77, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.004
  • Wenger, Edmund (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet