Violence in dating relationshipsValidation of the Dominating and Jealous Tactics Scale in Spanish youth

  1. Muñoz-Rivas, Marina J. 1
  2. Redondo, Natalia 1
  3. Zamarrón, Dolores 1
  4. González, María Pilar 2
  1. 1 Faculty of Psychology, Autónoma University of Madrid, Madrid (Spain)
  2. 2 Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid
Aldizkaria:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakien izenburua: January

Alea: 35

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 11-18

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.35.1.319251 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anales de psicología

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

La Escala de Tácticas Dominates y Celosas (Kasian y Painter, 1992) es uno de los instrumentos más utilizados para medir dominancia y celos en las relaciones de noviazgo en jóvenes y adolescentes. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar las propiedades psicométricas de esta escala y validar su adecuación en población juvenil española. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 8105 jovenes de la Comunidad de Madrid, con edades comprendidas entre los 14 y los 26 años. Los resultados del Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio indican que existen dos factores correlacionados: tácticas dominantes y tácticas celosas, en la línea del estudio original. La fiabilidad de la escala fue satisfactoria. En cuanto a la validez convergente, se observan correlaciones positivas y significativas con la verisón modificada de la Escala de Tácticas de Conflicto (M-CTS; Neidig, 1986) que mide violencia física y verbal en relaciones de noviazgo. En cuanto a la validez de grupos conocidos, se observan diferencias significativas en tácticas dominantes y celosas en función de la edad y el género, en el sentido esperado. Esta escala constituye un instrumento fiable y válido para evaluar tácticas dominantes y celosas en relaciones de parejas de jóvenes y adolescentes en España.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • References Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation mod-els. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94. doi: 10.1177/009207038801600107
  • Bentler, P. (2006). EQS 6. Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Mul-tivariate Software.
  • Byrne, B. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cano, A., Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1998). Dating violence in two high school samples: Discriminating variables. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 431-446. doi:10.1023/A:1022653609263
  • Cascardi, M., & Avery-Leaf, S. (2015). Gender differences in dating aggression and victimization among low-income, urban middle school students. Partner Abuse, 6(4), 283-402. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.6.4.383
  • Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S. A., O’Leary, K. D., & Smith Slep, A. M. S. (1999). Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students. Psychological Assessment, 11(4), 546-555. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.11.4.546
  • Fernández, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-related changes in dating aggression in Spanish high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi:10.1177/0886260513506057
  • Foshee, V. A., Benefield, T., Suchindran, C., Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., KarrikerJaffe, K. J., . . .Mathias, J. (2009). The development of four types of adolescent dating abuse and selected demographic correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(3), 380-400. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00593.x
  • García-Ael, C., Recio, P., & Silván-Ferrero, P. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Beliefs about Intimate Partner Violence (IBIPV). An-nals of Psychology, 34(1), 135-124. doi:10.6018/analesps.34.1.232901
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164-172.
  • Hernando, A., García, A. D., & Montilla, M. V. E. (2012). Exploration of atti-tudes and behaviors of college students to violence in intimate relation-ships. Revista Complutense de Educación, 23(2), 427-441.
  • Hird, M. J. (2000). An empirical study of adolescent dating aggression in the U.K. Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 69-78. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0292
  • Holditch, P., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Latzman, N. E., Valle, L. A., Kuoh, H., Burton,… Tharp, A. T. (2015). Prevalence of teen dating violence and co-occurring risk factors among middle school youth in high-risk urban communities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 13-55.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance struc-ture analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jackson, S. M., Cram, F., & Seymour, F. W. (2000). Violence and sexual coercion in high school students’ dating relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 23-36. doi:10.1023/A:1007545302987
  • Kar, H. L., & O’Leary, K. D. (2013). Patterns of psychological aggression, dominance, and jealousy within marriage. Journal of Family Violence, 28(2), 109-119. doi:10.1007/s10896-012-9492-7
  • Kasian, M., & Painter, S.L. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(3), 350-364. doi:10.1177/088626092007003005
  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • López-Ramos, Y., Navarro-Pardo, E., Fernández-Muñoz, J. J., & da Silva-Pocinho, R. F. (2018). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in an elderly Portuguese retirees students sim-ple. Annals of Psychology, 34(1), 146-152. doi:10.6018/analesps.34.1.267381
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Andreu, J. M., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González, P. (2007a). Validation of the modified version of the Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) in Spanish population of youths. Psicothema, 19(4), 692-697.
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González, M. P. (2007b). Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships in Spanish university students. Psicothema, 19(1), 102-107.
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González, M. P. (2009). Prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults. Psicothema, 21(2), 234-240.
  • Neidig, P. M. (1986). The Modified Conflict Tactics Scale. Beaufort, SC: Behavioral Sciences Associates.
  • O’Leary, K. D., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2003). A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(3), 314-327. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_01
  • Orpinas, P. Nahapetyan, L., Song, X., McNicholas, C., & Reeves, P. M. (2012). Psychological dating violence perpetration and victimization: Trajectories from middle to high school. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 510-520. doi:10.1002/ab.21441
  • Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., García-Jiménez, J. J., Llor-Esteban, B., & Godoy-Fernández, C. (2015). Risk factors for intimate partner violence in prison inmates. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.003
  • Sebastián, J., Verdugo, A., & Ortiz, B. (2014). Jealously and violence in dating relationships: Gender-related differences among a Spanish sample. Spa-nish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1-12. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.99
  • Shook, N. J., Gerrity, D. A., Jurich, J., & Segrist, A. E. (2000). Courtship violence among college students: A comparison of verbally and physically abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 1-22. doi:10.1023/A:1007532718917
  • Smith, D. M., & Donnelly, J. (2001). Adolescent dating violence: A multi-systemic approach of enhancing awareness in educators, parents, and so-ciety. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 21(1), 53-64.
  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and aggression: The Con-flict Tactics Scale (CTS). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(1), 75-88. doi:10.2307/351733
  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological mal-treatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
  • Tolman, R. M. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence and Victims, 14, 25-38.
  • Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Korchmaros, J. D., & Boyd, D. (2016). Lifetime prevalence rates and overlap of physical, psy-chological, and sexual dating abuse perpetration and victimization in a national sample of youth. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1083-1099. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0748-9
Datuen iturria: Dialnet