Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace

  1. Maribondo Albuquerque, Iara 1
  2. Rosas Torres, Ana Raquel 2
  3. Álvaro Estramiana, José Luis 3
  4. Garrido Luque, Alicia 3
  1. 1 Universidade Federal da Paraíba / Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  2. 2 Universidade Federal da Paraíba
    info

    Universidade Federal da Paraíba

    João Pessoa, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/00p9vpz11

  3. 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Revista Colombiana de Psicología

ISSN: 0121-5469

Ano de publicación: 2020

Volume: 29

Número: 2

Páxinas: 13-24

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15446/RCP.V29N2.80004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista Colombiana de Psicología

Resumo

O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a influencia dos estereótipos na discriminação contra a mulher. Concretamente, verificou-se o efeito do sexo do candidato (homem vs. mulher), do status referente à licença parental (exerce o direito vs. renuncia o direito) e dos estereótipos de competência, sociabilidade e moralidade nessa discriminação. Consistente com estudos prévios, o sexo do candidato e o status referente à licença parental interagem e juntos influenciam a discriminação contra a mulher (Estudo 1, F(1,229) = 22.45, p < .001). Por sua vez, a interação tripla entre gênero do candidato, status referente à licença parental e as três dimensões dos estereótipos (Estudo 2, F(4, 587) = 2.73, p = .030, ƞ² = .018) revelou que a mulher que disfrutou da licença parental foi avaliada mais positivamente nas três dimensões estereotípicas quando comparada à mulher que tinha renunciado o direito à licença e, ao mesmo tempo, ela foi mais mal avaliada na dimensão de competência quando comparada ao homem que exercia o mesmo direito (Estudo 2, N = 312).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albiston, C. (2007). Institutional Perspectives on Law, Work, and Family. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112803
  • Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty. Gender & Society, 24, 616–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142
  • Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
  • Burgess, N. (2013). The Motherhood Penalty: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgements of Job-Related Competence and Organizational Commitment. Seminar Research Paper Series, Paper 32. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/32/?utm_source=digitalcommons.uri.edu%2Flrc_paper_series%2F32&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
  • Bygren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Gähler, M. (2017). Do employers prefer fathers? Evidence from a field experiment testing the gender by parenthood interaction effect on callbacks to job applications. European Sociological Review, 33, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx051
  • Castillo-Mayén, R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of Current Gender Stereotypes. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1044-1060. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981
  • Connor, R. A., Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2016). Ambivalent Sexism in the Twenty-First Century. In C. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, 295 – 320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
  • Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2016). La perspectiva de la minoría: estereotipos y emociones entre grupos inmigrantes. Anales de Psicología, 32, 535-544. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.205341
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.P., …., & Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935
  • Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 75, 126 – 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2
  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender,123-174. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275 – 298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
  • Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018850404838
  • Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Flaquer, L., & Escobedo, A. (2014). Licencias parentales y política social de la paternidad en España. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32, 69-99. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CRLA.2014.v32.n1.44714
  • Garrido-Luque, A., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Rosas-Torres, A. R. (2018). Estereotipos de género, maternidad y empleo: un análisis psicológico, Pensando Psicología, 14. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v14i23.2261
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109 – 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
  • Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212
  • González, M. J., Cortina, C., & Rodríguez, J. (2019). The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Hiring: A Field Experiment. European Sociological Review, 35, 187 -204. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy055
  • Gungor, G., & Biernat, M. (2009). Gender Bias or Motherhood Disadvantage? Judgments of Blue Collar Mothers and Fathers in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 60, 232- 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9540-1
  • Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, (32), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
  • Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same Behavior, different consequences: Reactions to Men’s and Women’s Altruistic Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
  • Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender-fair language in job advertisements and hiring decisions. In S. Sczesny (Chair), Gender-fair language use from a social psychological perspective. Symposium conducted at the 16th General meeting of the European association of social psychology, Stockholm.
  • Johansson, E. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings, IFAU Working Paper 2010:4. ifau – Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Swedish Ministry of Employment. Uppsala, Sweden. Accessed May 1, 2017: http://www.ifau.se/ ISSN 1651-1166
  • Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012). Choice, Discrimination, and Motherhood Penalty. Law & Society Review, 46, 557–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00506.x
  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
  • Livermore, T., Rodgers, J., & Siminski, P. (2011). The Effect of Motherhood on Wages and Wage Growth: Evidence for Australia. The Economic Record, 87, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00745.x
  • López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (scm) towards three immigrant groups in Spain. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751375
  • Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2014). Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 96-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12011
  • Michinov, N., Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Méot, A. (2005). Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: A new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206402
  • Morales, M. & Aguirre, E. (2018). Involucramiento parental basado en el hogar y desempeño académico en la adolescencia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.15446/ rcp.v27n2.66212
  • Pedregosa, P. R., & Díaz, R. M. (2016). Sexismo hostil y benevolente en adolescentes. Una aproximación étnico-cultural. Género y Educación, 72, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie72126
  • Pereira, M., Álvaro, J. L. & Garrido, A. (2016). Procesos de esencialización de hombres y mujeres: Un estudio comparado Brasil-España. Anales de psicología, 32(1), 190-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.190841
  • Plickert, G., & Sterling, J. (2017). Gender still matters: Effects of workplace discrimination on employment schedules of young professionals. Laws, 6, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040028
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personal variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Sterling, J., & Reichman, N. (2016). Overlooked and Undervalued: Women in Private Law Practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 373–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121705
  • Sullivan, C. (2015). ‘Bad Mum Guilt’: the representation of ‘work-life balance’ in UK women’s magazines. Community, Work & Family, 18, 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2014.970128
Fonte de datos: Dialnet