Service innovation dynamics towards open and social innovation

  1. Jorge Gallego 1
  2. Luis Rubalcaba
  3. David Gago
  1. 1 Autonomous University of MadridMadrid, Spain
Libro:
Open innovation 2.0 yearbook 2017-2018.

Editorial: Publications Office of the European Union

ISBN: 978-92-79-92585-6

Año de publicación: 2018

Páginas: 59-67

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.2759/815824 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

The Open innovation 2.0 yearbook 2017-2018 builds on the experience of open innovation cases already introduced in the previous editions. Open innovation 2.0 (OI2) is gaining momentum and is scaling up in very many domains, as this publication will show. We provide new perspectives on open innovation ecosystems. How to build and run them from the process and skills perspective is of great importance when scaling up open innovation 2.0. Innovation measurement and modelling are topics we deal with as well, as it is important to understand the impact of the OI2 approach compared to traditional innovation patterns.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • OECD, New nature of innovation, Paris, 2009.
  • Chesbrough, H., Open services innovation — Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011.
  • Gallouj, F., Rubalcaba, L. and Windrum, P. (eds), Public private innovation networks in services, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013
  • Daniel, J., ‘Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility’, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Vol. 3, Art. 18, 2012.
  • Yuan, L and Powell, S., MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education — A White Paper, JISC CETIS, 2013.
  • Khalil, H. and Ebner, M., ‘How satisfied are you with your MOOC? A research study on interaction in huge online courses’, Proceedings of the AACE World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Victoria, 2013, pp. 830-839
  • Patru, M. and Balaji, V., Making sense of the MOOCs — A guide for policy makers in developing countries, Unesco and Commonwealth of Learning (COL), Paris, 2016.
  • Chesbrough, H., ‘Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation’, in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (eds), Open innovation: researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, pp. 1-12.
  • Salter, A. and Tether, B. S., ‘Innovation in services: through the looking glass of innovation studies’, background paper for Advanced Institute of Management (AIM) Research’s Grand Challenge on Service Science, 2006, 7.
  • Rubalcaba, L., Gallego, J. and Gago, D., ‘On the differences between goods and services innovation’, Journal of Innovation Economics, Vol. 5, 2010, pp. 17-40.
  • Curley, M. and Salmelin, B., ‘Open innovation 2.0: a new paradigm’, OI2 conference paper, EU Open Innovation and Strategy Policy Group, 2013 (http:// ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/ document.cfm?doc_id=2182).
  • European Commission, OSI — Socio-economic impact of open service innovation, Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media, Luxembourg, 2011.
  • Tepsie — Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Social Innovation in Europe, 2013 (http://www.tepsie.eu).
  • Vargo, S. and Lusch, R., ‘Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, No 1, 2004, pp. 1-17.
  • Vargo, S. and Lusch, R., ‘Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No 1, 2008, pp. 1-10.
  • OECD LEED Forum on Social Innovations, OECD, Paris, 2000 (http://www.oecdorg/document/53/0,3343, fr 2649 34459 39263221 1 1 1 1.00.html-28k-).
  • European Commission, FP7 Cooperation Work programme 2011, theme 8, Socio-economic sciences and humanities, European Commission, Brussels, 2011.
  • Rubalcaba, L., Michel, S., Sundbo, J., Brown, S. W. and Reynoso, J., ‘Shaping, organizing, and rethinking service innovation: a multidimensional framework’, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 23, No 5, 2013, pp. 696-715.
  • Gallouj, F., Innovation in the service economy: the new wealth of nations, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2002.
  • Windrum, P. and García-Goñi, M., ‘A neoSchumpeterian model of health services innovation’, Research Policy, Vol. 37, No 4, 2008, pp. 649-672.
  • Rubalcaba, L., ‘Social innovation and its relationships with service and system innovations’, in Toivonen, M. (ed.), Service innovation — Novel ways of creating value in actor systems, Springer, Berlin, 2016, pp. 69-93.
  • Harrisson, D., Klein, J. L. and Leduc Browne, P., ‘Social innovation, social enterprise and services’, in Gallouj, F. and Djellal, F. (eds), The handbook of innovation and services — A multi-disciplinary perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2010, pp. 197-218.
  • Lancaster, K. J., ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, No 2, 1996, pp. 132-157.
  • Gallouj, F. and Weinstein, O., ‘Innovation in services’, Research Policy, Vol. 26, No 4, 1997, pp. 537-556.
  • Gallouj, F. and Djellal, F. (eds), The handbook of innovation and services — A multi-disciplinary perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2010.
  • Windrum, P., Schartinger, D., Rubalcaba, L., Gallouj, F. and Toivonen, M., ‘The co-creation of multiagent social innovations: a bridge between service and social innovation research, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 19, No 2, 2016, pp. 150-166.
  • Wanzenböck, I., Rubalcaba, L., Montes, O. and Weber, M., ‘Policy developments and measures for enhancing ServPPINs dynamics’, in Gallouj, F., Rubalcaba, L. and Windrum, P. (eds), Public private innovation networks in service, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013, pp. 432-461.