Un estudio empírico con Sketch Engine sobre la interfaz sintáctico-‍pragmática para la identificación de la estructura temática intraoracional en español

  1. del Olmo Suárez, Elena 1
  2. Arias Rodríguez, Iván 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista de Humanidades Digitales

ISSN: 2531-1786

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 6

Páginas: 129-150

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RHD.VOL.6.2021.30965 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Humanidades Digitales

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

In this article we address, through a case study, the formalisation of the thematic progression theory in order to render explicit the conceptual development patterns within texts. The text analysis tool Sketch Engine, whose features and short-comings will be addressed and discussed, is applied to analyse a corpus of morphosyntactically annotated Spanish journalistic texts with the aim of exploring which patterns enable the inference of the thematic structure of the sentences. For this purpose, we carried out a study of the morpho-syntactic and lexical features which characterise themes and rhemes of every sentence and, subsequently, we empirically validated them in the corpus. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our methodology and identify future lines of research.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arias, I., Fernández-Pampillón, A., Samy, D., & Arús, J. (2020). Taller sobre herramientas de análisis textual: La herramienta Sketch Engine. E-Prints Complutense.
  • Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Linguistics and Language Compass, 3(1), 19–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00099.x
  • Buchholz, S., & Marsi, E. (2006). CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.3115/1596276.1596305
  • Cassanova, V., & Franco, A. (2006). Tema, rema y focalización: del enunciado al texto. Análisis de títulos y leads de prensa. Quórum Académico.
  • Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Mouton.
  • Davies, F. (1997). Marked theme as a heuristic for analysing text-type, text and genre. In J. Piqué & D. Viera (Eds.), Applied Languages: Theory and Practice in ESP (pp. 45–80). Universidad de Valencia.
  • Downing, A. (1992). Organising the message: Thematic and information structures of the clause. In A. Downing & P. Locke (Eds.), A university course in english grammar (pp. 220–264). Prentice-Hall.
  • Gallego, Á. J., Brucart, J., López, L., Uriagereka, J., Lorenzo, G., Longa, V., González, R., Hernanz, M., Etxepare, R., Uribe-Etxebarria, M., Roca, F., Ordóñez, F., Vicente, L., Depiante, M.,
  • Ausin, A., Pérez, P., Elordieta, G., & Irurtzun, A. (2012). El movimiento de constituyentes. Visor Libros.
  • Gutiérrez Ordóñez, S. (1997). Temas, remas, focos, topicos y comentiaros. In Cuadernos de lengua espanola.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English Part I. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. In An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
  • Haupt, F. S., Schlesewsky, M., Roehm, D., Friederici, A. D., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2008). The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 54–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.003
  • Leech, G., & Wilson, A. (1996). EAGLES: Recommendations for the morphosyntactic annotation of corpora.
  • Matthiessen, C. (1992). Interpreting the textual metafunction. In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: recent theory and practice (pp. 37–82). Pinter.
  • Padró, L., & Stanilovsky, E. (2012). Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U.
  • Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) (pp. 2473–2479). : European Language Resources Association (ELRA).