Socrative como herramienta de mejora del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje en Educación Superior

  1. Carmen Juan Llamas 1
  2. Alejandro de la Viuda Serrano 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Aldizkaria:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Zenbakien izenburua: La educación en clave audiovisual y multipantalla

Alea: 25

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 279-297

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.25.1.31182 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Laburpena

This study tested the software application Socrative, an online evaluation Student Response System (SRS) tool, in the subject of Statistics (degree of Biology). The main objective was to test whether its use improves both quantitative and qualitative results of students, and the efficiency of the teaching-learning process from the teacher’s point of view. Two Socrative tests were carried out and 66 students from a Faculty of Biology at Madrid region participated being divided into two experimental and two control groups. Student’s t-test for independent samples was used to analyse quantitative improvements in academic results. For qualitative aspects the Socrative assessment questionnaire for students, created by Wash, was applied. Moreover, a self-report questionnaire for teachers after using SRS tools, developed by Cheung et al., was administered and a semi-structured interview was conducted to analyse the teacher’s perception about the influence of the intervention. Results proved inconclusive regarding improvements in academic performance, showing significant improvements for the experimental group of the first Socrative test, but not for the second. Furthermore, the use of Socrative gained a more active participation of the teacher in the teaching-learning process improving the classroom dynamics and increased additionally motivation and participation of students and their subjective perception of learning more and in a simpler way.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Acaso, M. (2013). rEDUvolution hacer la REVOLUCIÓN en la EDUCACIÓN. Paidós.
  • Aljaloud, A., Gromik, N., Billingsley, W. y Kwan, P. (2015). Research trends in student response systems: a literature review. International Journal of Learning Technology, 10(4), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlt.2015.074073
  • Álvarez, S., Cuéllar, C., López, B., Adrada, C., Anguiano, R., Bueno, A., Comas, I. y Gómez, S. (2011). Actitudes de los profesores ante la información de las TIC en la práctica docente. Estudio de un grupo de la Universidad de Valladolid. Edutec, 35.
  • Artal, J., Casanova, O., Serrano, R. y Romero, E. (2017). Dispositivos móviles y flipped-classroom. Una experiencia multidisciplinar de formación del profesorado. Edutec, 59.
  • Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B. y Manzoor, U. (2014). Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 3(4), 17-24.
  • Balta, N., y Güvercin, S. (2016). Increasing undergraduate students’ exam performances in statistics course using software Socrative. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 314-321. http://www.tojet.net/special/2016_7_1.pdf
  • Balta, N., Perera-Rodríguez, V.H. y Hervás-Gómez, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23(12), 837-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9638-6
  • Balta, N., y Tzafilkou, K. (2019). Using Socrative software for instant formative feedback in physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 307-323.
  • Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B. y Sese, F.J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102-110.
  • Chaiyo, Y., y Nokham, R. (2017). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student’s perception in the classrooms response system. International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdamt.2017.7904957
  • Cheung, G., Wan, K. y Chan, K. (2018). Efficient Use of Clickers: A Mixed-Method Inquiry with University Teachers. Education Sciences, 8(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010031
  • Dervan, P. (2014). Enhancing in-class student engagement using socrative (an online student response system): a report. All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 6(3), 1801-1813.
  • Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C. y Martínez-Herráiz, J.J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
  • Frías, M.V., Arce, C. y Flores-Morales, P. (2016). Uso de la plataforma socrative.com para alumnos de Química General. Educación Química, 27(1), 59–66.
  • González, M.O., y Huerta, P. (2019). Experiencia del aula invertida para promover estudiantes prosumidores del nivel superior. RIED, 22(2), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23065
  • González-Fernández, N., y Salcines-Talledo, I. (2015). El Smatphone en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje-evaluación en Educación Superior. Percepciones de docentes y estudiantes. Relieve, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7480
  • Haintz, C., Pichler, K. y Ebner, M. (2014). Developing a web-based question-driven audience response system supporting BYOD. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 39–56.
  • Hernández, F. (2002). Docencia e investigación en educación superior. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 20(2), 270-301.
  • Hernández, R., Fernández-Collado, C. y Baptista, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
  • Hew, K.F., Huang, B., Chu, K.W.S. y Chiu, D.K.W. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92, 221-236.
  • Marín-Díaz, V., Vega-Gea, E. y Passey, D. (2019). Determination of problematic use of social networks by university students. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23289
  • Marzilli, C., Delello, J., Marmion, S., Mcwhorter, R., Roberts, P. y Marzilli, T.S. (2014). Faculty attitudes towards integrating technology and innovation. IJITE, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2014.3101
  • Monteagudo, J., Gómez, C.J. y Miralles, P. (2017). Evaluación del diseño e implementación de la metodología flipped-classroom en la formación del profesorado de ciencias sociales. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 55. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/55/7
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P. y Hambleton, R.K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157.
  • Observatorio de Innovación Educativa (2017). Radar de Innovación Educativa 2017. México: Tecnológico de Monterrey - Universidad de Monterrey. https://observatorio.tec.mx/radar-de-innovacin-educativa-2017
  • O’Bannon, B.W., y Thomas, K.M. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: preservice teachers answer the call. Computers & Education, 85, 110-122. https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/348259.pdf.
  • Pettit, R.K., Mccoy, L., Kinney, M. y Schwartz, F.N. (2015). Student perceptions of gamified audience response system interactions in large group lectures and via lecture capture technology. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 1-15.
  • Romero, A., Hidalgo, M.D., González, F., Carrillo, E., Pedraja, M., García, J. y Pérez, M. (2013). Enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios: comparación de resultados con los cuestionarios ASSIST y R-SPQ-2F. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(2), 375-391.
  • Serrano, R.M., y Casanova, O. (2018). Recursos tecnológicos y educativos destinados al enfoque pedagógico Flipped Learning. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 16(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2018.8921
  • Stowell, J.R. (2015). Use of clickers versus mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education, 82, 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.008
  • Thoms, B. (2011). A dynamic social feedback system to support learning and social interaction in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(4), 340-352.
  • Trindade, J. (2014). Promoção da interatividade na sala de aula com Socrative: estudo de caso. Indagatio Didactica, 6(1), 254-268.
  • Troncoso, C., y Daniele, E. (2003). Las entrevistas semiestructuradas como instrumentos de recolección de datos una aplicación en el campo de las Ciencias Naturales. Anuario Digital de Investigación Educativa, 14, 543-555.
  • Wang, A.I., Aanesl, A.E. y Gamnes, V. (2014). Three Social Classroom Applications to Improve Student Attitudes. Education Research International, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/259128
  • Wash, P.D. (2014). Taking advantage of mobile devices: using Socrative in the classroom. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3(1), 99-101.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet