Régimen jurídico aplicable a los intereses de demora en el arbitraje comercial internacional:propuestas de armonización

  1. Briseida Sofía Jiménez Gómez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

ISSN: 1697-5197

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 42

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17103/REEI.42.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

Resumen

El presente estudio tiene como objeto el análisis de la determinación del régimen jurídico aplicable a los intereses de demora sobre las cantidades finales que los árbitros conceden en el laudo en el marco de un arbitraje comercial internacional. Se realiza un estudio exhaustivo de las posibilidades que ofrece el método del conflicto de leyes tradicional, pues se utiliza, a pesar de la mayor flexibilidad que tienen los árbitros con respecto a la determinación de la ley aplicable en un arbitraje en comparación con los jueces. Se examinan laudos de arbitraje comercial internacional y de arbitraje de inversiones, así como sentencias judiciales nacionales para proponer soluciones prácticas que ayuden a los árbitros en su determinación con respecto a su competencia para conceder intereses, el periodo de devengo y el tipo de interés aplicable.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este estudio ha sido realizado en el marco del proyecto de investigación 20944/PD/18. Fundación Séneca. Región de Murcia.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ATAMER, Y. M., “Section III. Interest”, en KRÖLL, S., MISTELIS, L., PERALES VISCASILLAS (eds.), UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), A Commentary, 2nd ed., München, C.H. Beck, 2018, pp. 1032-1033.
  • AZEREDO DA SILVEIRA M., y LEVY, L., “Transgression of the Arbitrators’ Authority: Article V(1)(c) of the New York Convention en GAILLARD E. y DI PIETRO, D. (eds.), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice, London, Cameron May, 2008, p. 656.
  • BEHARRY, C. L., “Prejudgment Interest Rates in International Investment Arbitration”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2017, No. 8, p. 70.
  • BENITO FERNÁNDEZ, L., Intereses moratorios e intereses legales procesales en la práctica de los tribunales, Madrid, 2000, p. 73
  • BERGER, K. P., “International Arbitral Practice and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1998, vol. 46, no.1, pp.129-150, p. 142.
  • BERMANN, G., “International Arbitration and Private International Law”, Recueil des cours, Vol. 381, 2016, p. 216.
  • BLACKABY, N., et al, Redfern and Hunter on International Commercial Arbitration, 6th ed, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, §9.73.
  • BORN, G., International Commercial Arbitration, 3rd ed. Kluwer Law International, 2021
  • BRANSON, D. J., WALLACE JR., R. E., “Awarding Interest in international commercial arbitration: Establishing a uniform approach”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1998, pp. 919-948, p. 931.
  • Brower, C. N., “Awarding Interest- Ex officio or only if requested, at what rate, as of when, compound or not?”, en WIRTH, M. (ed.), The resolution of the dispute: from the hearing to the award: Conference of January 26, 2007, Geneva, Bâle, ASA Special Series, p. 70.
  • CHECA MARTÍNEZ, M., Laudo del tribunal de arbitraje de la CCI (Asunto núm. 7153), Revista de la Corte Española de Arbitraje, 1992, pp. 249-252.
  • COLON J. M. y KNOLL, M. S., “Prejudgment Interest in International Arbitration”, Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law, 2007, 185, p. 3
  • CORDERO-MOSS, G. y BEHN, D., “The relevance of the UNIDROIT Principles in investment arbitration”, Rev. dr. unif., Vol. 19, No. 4, 2014, pp. 570–608, p. 588.
  • CORTERIER, A., “Interest in Uniform Application - How to Solve the Un Sales Law's Interest Rate Problem Under CISG Article 78 And CISG Article 84”, Review of the Convention of Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 2003, section 2.
  • CREMADES, B.M. “El arbitraje ¿equivalente jurisdiccional?”, en RUIZ RISUEÑO, F., FERNÁNDEZ ROZAS, J.C., (coords.), El arbitraje y la buena administración de justicia, Libro Conmemorativo del 30 aniversario de la Corte Civil y Mercantil de Arbitraje, CIMA, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, 2019, pp. 43-50.
  • DANILOWICZ, V., “The choice of applicable law in international arbitration”, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 9, No.2, 1986, pp. 235-284, p. 261.
  • DE MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A., “Iura Novit Curia and Commercial Arbitration in Spain”, en FERRARI, F., CorderoMoss, G. (eds), Iura Novit Curia in International Arbitration, Huntington, New York, Juris, 2018, pp. 319- 354, p. 342, p. 354.
  • De MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A. “The Rome I and II Regulation in International Commercial Arbitration”, en FERRARI, F., (ed.), The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Juris, 2017, pp. 177-243, p. 196.
  • DERAINS, Y., “Intérêts Moratoires, Dommages-Intérêts Compensatoires et Dommages Punitifs Devant l’Arbitre International” en Etudes offertes à Pierre Bellet, Paris, Litec, 1991, p. 106
  • DERAINS, Y., “The Role of the UNIDROIT Principles in International Commercial Arbitration (1): a European Perspective”, The ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement, 2002, pp. 9-19, p. 9.
  • DOLGOFF, A. y DUARTE-SILVA, T., “Prejudgment Interest: An Economic Review of Alternative Approaches”, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2016, pp. 99-114, p. 114.
  • FERNÁNDEZ ARROYO, D. P., “Arbitrator’s Procedural Powers: The Last Frontier of Party Autonomy?”, en FERRARI, F., (ed.), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration, Juris, 2016, p. 202.
  • FERNÁNDEZ ROZAS, J. C., “Arbitraje comercial internacional”, en FERNÁNDEZ ROZAS, J. C., ARENAS GARCÍA, R., DE MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A., Derecho de los Negocios Internacional, Sexta ed., Madrid, Iustel, 2020, p. 680 y ss.
  • FERNÁNDEZ ROZAS, J.C., SÁNCHEZ LORENZO, S., STAMPA, G., Principios Generales del Arbitraje, Tirant, Valencia, 2018, p. 387.
  • FERRARI, F., “La Question des taux d’intérêt sur les arriérés”, AJ Contrats, 2020, No. 12, p. 531.
  • FERRARI, F., “Le champ d'application des «Principes pour les contrats commerciaux internationaux» élaborés par Unidroit”, Revue internationale de droit comparé, Vol. 47, N°4, 1995, p. 993.
  • FERRARI, F., “Plures leges faciunt arbitrum”, Arbitration International, 2021, pp. 1-19, p. 5.
  • Friedland, P. D. Arbitration Clauses for International Contracts, 2nd ed., Juris, 2007, p. 103.
  • GAILLARD, E., Legal Theory of International Arbitration, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010, p. 56.
  • GARNETT, R., Substance and Procedure in Private International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, § 11.03.
  • GIARDINA, A., “Issues of Applicable Law and Uniform Law on Interest: Basic Distinctions in National and International Practice”, en DE LY F.J.M. y LÉVY, L. (eds.), Interest, Auxiliary and Alternative Remedies in International Arbitration, Vol. 5, Kluwer Law International, (ICC) 2008, pp. 129 – 165, p. 129.
  • GOTANDA, J. Y., “Awarding Interest in International Arbitration”, American Journal of International Law, 1996, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp. 40-63, p. 41.
  • GOTANDA, J.Y. “Damages in Private International Law”, Recueil des cours, Vol. 326, 2007, p. 85.
  • HAMMOUD, L. y SECOMB, M., “Interest in ICC Arbitral Awards: Introduction and Commentary”, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 2004, Vol. 15, No.1
  • HEISKANEN, V., “And/Or: The Problem of Qualification in International Arbitration”, Arbitration International, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2010, pp. 456-457.
  • HUNTER, M. y TRIEBEL, V., “Awarding Interest in International Arbitration: Some Observations Based on A Comparative Study of the Laws of England and Germany”, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1989, pp. 7-23, p. 17.
  • KARRER, P., “Transnational Law of Interest in International Arbitration”, en GAILLARD, E. (ed.), Transnational Rules in International Commercial Arbitration (ICC Publ No. 480/4), Paris, 1993, pp. 223- 231, p. 230.
  • LEW, J. D. M., “Interest on Money Awards in International Arbitration”, en CRANSTON, R. (ed.), Making Commercial Law – Essays in Honour of Roy Goode, Clarendon Press, 1997, p. 568.
  • LORD COLLINS OF MAPESBURY, Dicey, Morris & Collins on the conflict of laws, 15th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 2018, §7-089
  • MARBOE, I., “Calculation of Damages in the Yukos Award: Highlighting the Value Date, Contributory Fault and Interest”, ICSID Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2015, p. 334
  • MAZZOTTA, F., “CISG Article 78: Endless Disagreement Among Commentators, Much Less Among the Courts”, en Review of The Convention on Contracts for the Sale of Goods (CISG), Pace Int’l L. Rev. ed., 2004, p. 148.
  • PADURA BALLESTEROS, M.T., Los intereses procesales por demora, ed. Trivium,1999, p. 27.
  • PERALES VISCASILLAS, P., “UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: Sphere of Application and General Provisions”, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 13, 1996, pp. 381 et seq, p. 401.
  • Queen Mary & White & Case 2018, International Arbitration Survey, p. 34, disponible en: http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---TheEvolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF
  • PwC, Disputes perspectives Tribunals’ conflicts on interest, 2016, disponible en: https://www.pwc.co.uk/tax/assets/tribunals-conflicts-on-interest-new.pdf .
  • RAOUL-DUVAL, P. “Intérêts moratoires: vers une remise en cause du pouvoir des arbitres? (À propos d’un arrêt de la Cour d’appel de Paris du 30 juin 2005”, Gazette du Palais, 15 de diciembre 2005, No. 349, pp. 11-13.
  • REDFERN, A., HUNTER, M., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004, p. 395.
  • REISBERG, S. H. y PAULEY, K., “An Arbitrator’s Authority to Award Interest on An Award Until “Date of Payment” – Problems and Limitations”, International Arbitration Law Review, 2013, No. 1, pp. 25-30, p. 25.
  • RIAD, T., “The Issue of Interest in Middle East Laws and Islamic Law”, en DE LY, F.J.M. y LÉVY, L. (eds.), Interest, Auxiliary and Alternative Remedies in International Arbitration, Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law, Volume 5, Kluwer Law International, 2008, p. 201.
  • RODNER, J. O., “The Applicable Interest Rate in International Arbitration (UNIDROIT Principles), Article 7.4.9.”, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 2004, Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 43
  • SÁNCHEZ LORENZO, S., “Derecho aplicable al fondo de la controversia en el arbitraje comercial internacional”, R.E.D.I., vol. LXI, 2009, pp. 39-74, p. 56.
  • SÁNCHEZ LORENZO, S., “Sobre la ley aplicable al arbitraje y el principio Iura Novit Curia”, en RUIZ RISUEÑO, F., FERNÁNDEZ ROZAS, J.C (coords.), El arbitraje y la buena administración de justicia, Libro Conmemorativo del 30 aniversario de la Corte Civil y Mercantil de Arbitraje, CIMA, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, 2019, pp. 410-419, p. 410.
  • SECOMB, M., Interest in International Arbitration: An Economic Approach, First ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 40-41.
  • SÉNÉCHAL, T. J. y GOTANDA, J. Y., “Interest as damages”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 47, No.3, 2009, pp. 491-536, p. 492.
  • SHEHATA, I., “Middle East/ Africa: Egypt - Partial Refusal to Enforce Award Brings Out Interest Rates Public Policy Dilemma”, ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin, 2020, No. 2, pp. 5 et seq.
  • SILBERMAN, L., FERRARI, F., “Getting to the law applicable to the merits in international arbitration and the consequences of getting it wrong”, en FERRARI, F., y KRÖLL, S., (eds.), Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration, 2nd ed., Juris, 2019, p. 435.
  • SOLOMON, D., “The Scope of the Submission to Arbitration”, en FERRARI, F., y ROSENFELD, F. (eds.), Autonomous Versus Domestic Concepts under the New York Convention, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2021, p. 262.
  • THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL DISPUTES, NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION: “Awards of Interest in International Commercial Arbitration: New York Law and Practice”, Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 2017, Vol. 28, p. 66.
  • TOUBIANA, A., Le domaine de la loi du contract en droit international privé, Paris, Dalloz, 1972, pp. 116-117.
  • VEEDER, V. V., “Compound Interest and Specific Performance: “Arbitral Imperium” and Sections 49 and 48 of the English Arbitration Act 1996”, en DE LY, F.J.M. y Lévy, L. (eds), Interest, Auxiliary and Alternative Remedies in International Arbitration, Volume 5, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2008, pp. 79-88, p. 80.
  • VEEDER, V.V., “Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration” en KAPLAN, N. Y PRYLES, M. (eds.), Jurisdiction, Admissibility and the Choice of Law in International arbitration- Liber Amicorum Michael Pryles, Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2018, pp. 373 -384, p. 382.
  • WEINCYMER, J. M., Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2012, p. 1189.
  • WELSH, A., “The Law Applicable to the Award of Interest: A Roadmap Through the Maze”, World Arbitration & Mediation Review, Vol. 5, No.1, 2011, pp. 23-41, p. 40.
  • YOSHIDA, I., “Comparison of Awarding Interest on Damages in Scotland, England, Japan and Russia”, J. Int'l Arb., Vol. 17, No.2, 2000, pp. 41-72, p. 46.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet