Wage inequality and poverty effects of lockdown and social distancing in Europe

  1. Juan C. Palomino 1
  2. Juan G. Rodríguez 2
  3. Raquel Sebastián Lago 2
  1. 1 University of Oxford
    info

    University of Oxford

    Oxford, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/052gg0110

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

ISSN: 2341-2356

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 3

Páginas: 1-41

Tipo: Documento de Trabajo

Otras publicaciones en: Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

Resumen

The “social distancing” measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 impose economic costs that go beyond the contraction of GDP. Since different occupations are not equally affected, this supply shock may have distributional implications. Here, we evaluate the potential impact of enforced social distancing on wage inequality and poverty across Europe. We compute a Lockdown Working Ability (LWA) index which represents the capacity of individuals to work under a lockdown given their teleworking index −that we obtain for European occupations using 2018 EU-LFS− and whether their occupation is essential or closed. Combining our LWA index and 2018 EU-SILC, we calculate individuals’ potential wage losses under six scenarios of lockdown. The Lockdown Incidence Curves show striking differential wage losses across the distribution, and we consistently find that both poverty and wage inequality rise in all European countries. These changesincrease with the duration of the lockdown and vary with the country under consideration. We estimate an increase in the headcount index of 3 percentage points for overall Europe, while the mean loss rate for the poor is 10.3%, using the 2 months lockdown simulation. In the same scenario, inequality measured by the Gini coefficient increases 2.2% in all Europe, but more than 4% in various countries. When we decompose overall inequality in Europe into between- and within-countries components, both elements significantly increase with the lockdown, being the change of the latter more important.

Información de financiación

The authors acknowledge funding from Citi for the Inequality and Prosperity programme at INET at the Oxford Martin School (Palomino) and from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación under project PID2019-104619RB-C42, COTEC Foundation and Comunidad de Madrid under project H2019/HUM-5793-OPINBI-CM (Rodríguez and Sebastián)

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barbieri, T, Basso, G. and Scicchitano, S. (2020): “Italian workers at risk during the COVID-19 epidemic”, Inapp Working Paper n. 46. Also as Banca d’Italia, Occasional Papers, forthcoming.
  • Boletin Oficial del Estado (14th March, 2020): Royal Decree 463/2020. Retrieved from: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2020-3692
  • Boletin Oficial del Estado (29th March, 2020): Royal Decree 10/2020. Retrieved from: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2020-4166
  • Bourguignon, F. (1979): “Decomposable Income Inequality Measures”, Econometrica, 47(4), 901-20.
  • Brunori, P., Maitino, M.L., Ravagli, L. and Sciclone, N. (2020): “Distant and unequal. Lockdown and inequalities in Italy”, mimeo.
  • Cowell, F.A. and Flachaire, E. (2018): “Inequality Measurement and the Rich: Why Inequality Increased More than We Thought”, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE. Working Papers Series, 36.
  • Del Rio-Chanona, R.M., Mealy, P., Pichler, A., Lafond, F. and Farmer, D.F. (2020): “Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspective”, COVID Economics Vetted and Real-Time Papers, Centre for Economic Policy Research Press, Issue 6, Retrieved from: https://cepr.org/content/covid-economics-vetted-and-real-time-papers-0
  • Dingel, J. and Neiman, B. (2020): “How many jobs can be done at home?”, NBER Working Paper No. 26948.
  • Dorn, F., Fuest, C., Göttert, M., Krolage, C., Lautenbacher, S., Lehmann, R., Link, S., Möhrle, S., Peichl, A., Reif, M., Sauer, S., Stöckli, M., Wohlrabe, K. and Wollmershäuser, T. (2020): “The Economic Costs of the Coronavirus Shutdown for Selected European Countries: A Scenario Calculation”, EconPol Policy Brief, 25. Retrieved from: https://www.econpol.eu/publications/policy_brief_25
  • Duclos, J.-Y (2009): “What is pro-poor?”, Social Choice and Welfare, 32(1), 37-58.
  • Eichhorn,W., Funke, H. and Richter, W.F. (1984): “Tax progression and inequality of income distribution”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 13, 127-131.
  • Essama-Nssah, B. and Lambert, P.J. (2009): “Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results”, Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 752-778.
  • Foster, J.E. and Shneyerov, A.A. (2000): “Path Independent Inequality Measures”, Journal of Economic Theory, 91(2), 199-222.
  • Furceri, D., Loungani, P., Ostry, J.D. and Pizzuto, P. (2020): “Will Covid-19 affect inequality? Evidence from past pandemics”, Covid Economics, 12, 138-57.
  • Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana (23rd February, 2020): Decreto-Legge 23 febbraio 2020, n. 6. Retrieve from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/02/23/20G00020/sg
  • Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana (25th March, 2020): Decreto-Legge 25 marzo 2020, n. 19. Retrieve from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/25/20G00035/sg
  • Hicks, M.J., Faulk, D. and Devaraj, S. (2020): “Occupational exposure to social distancing: A preliminary analysis using O*NET data”, Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University.
  • IMF (2020): “COVID-19−Impact and policy considerations”, G-20 Surveillance Note. Release in https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/2020/041520.pdf.
  • Irlacher, M. and Koch, M. (2020): “Working from home, wages, and regional inequality in the light of Covid-19”, CESifo Working Papers No. 8232. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/25/20G00035/sg
  • Kakwani, N. and Pernia, N. (2000): “What is pro-poor growth”, Asian Development Review, 16(1), 1-22.
  • Kakwani, N. and Son, H. (2008): “Poverty equivalent growth rate”, Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 643-655.
  • Koren, M. and Petö, R. (2020): “Business disruptions from social distancing”, ArXiv:2003.13983.
  • Mongey, S., Pilossoph, L. and Weinberg, A. (2020): “Which workers bear the burden of social distancing policies?”, NBER Working Paper No. 27085.
  • Ravallion, M. and Chen, S. (2003): “Measuring pro-poor growth”, Economics Letters, 78, 93-99.
  • Shorrocks, A.F. (1980): “The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures”, Econometrica, 48(3), 613-625.
  • Watts, H.W. (1968): An economic definition of poverty, in Moynihan, D.P. (Ed.), On Understanding Poverty. Basic Books, New York.
  • Zheng, B. (1993): “An axiomatic characterization of the Watts index”, Economics Letters, 42, 81-86.