La evaluación del profesorado español y el impacto del "feedback" en las prácticas docentes. Análisis de TALIS 2013

Bibliographic References

• Barber, M., Mourshed, M., (2007) Education Report on Education. How the World's Best-performing School Systems Come Out on Top, , http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/ukireland/publications/pdf/Education_report.pdf, (McKinsey y Company) (Consultado el 3.II.2015)
• Basto, M., Pereira, J.M., An SPSS R-menu for ordinal factor analysis (2012) Journal of Statistical Software, 46, p. 4
• Calleja, T., Collado, S., Macías, G., San José, C., (2012) Educación en Espana. Motivos para la Esperanza, , https://www.google.es/search?q=Educacion_en_Espana_Motivos_para_la_esperanza.pdfyoq=Educacion_en_Espana_Motivos_para_la_esperanza.pdfyaqs=chrome.69i57j69i6012.408j0j4ysourceid=chromeyes_sm=93yie=UTF-8, (Consultado el 1.II.2015)
• (2010) National Education Technology Plan, , http://www.ed.gov/technology/draft-netp2010/individualized-personalized-differentiated-instruction, DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCACIÓN (EE.UU) (Consultado el 3.II.2015)
• García-Carrasco, J., Bernal-Guerrero, A., (2008) Institutión y Decepción: La Salubridad Institucional y la Práctica Docente, Revista Espanola de Pedagogia, 66 (241), pp. 405-424
• Hagermoser Sanetti, L.M., Fallon, L.M., Collier-Meek, M., Increasing teacher treatment integrity through performance feedback provided by school personnel (2013) Psychology in the Schools, 50 (2), pp. 134-150
• Hattie, J.A.C., (2009) Visible Learning. A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement, , (Oxon, Routledge)
• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., Beavis, A., Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teacher's knowledge, practice, student outcomes y efficacy (2005) Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 13, p. 10
• Jornet, J., López-González, E., Tourón, J., Los cuestionarios de contexte en las evaluaciones de sistemas educativos (2012) Bordón, 64 (2), pp. 9-195. , (Monográfico)
• Lance, C.E., Butts, M.M., Michels, L.C., The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? (2006) Organizational Research Methods, 9 (2), pp. 202-220
• Marcelo, C., Vaillant, D., (2009) Desarrollo Profesional Docente, , (Madrid, Narcea)
• Marsh, H.W., Roche, L.A., Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective the critical issues of validity, bias, and utility (1997) American Psychologist, 52 (11), pp. 1187-1197
• Marshall, K., Fine-tuning teacher evaluation (2012) Educational Leadership, 70 (3), pp. 50-53
• Maslow, V.J., Kelley, C.J., Does evaluation advance teaching practice? The effects of performance evaluation on teaching quality and system change in large diverse high schools (2012) Journal of School Leadership, 22 (3), pp. 600-632
• (2013) Feedback for Better Teaching. Nine Principles for Using Measures of Effective Teaching, , http://www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Feedback%20for%20Better%20Teaching_Principles%20Paper.pdf, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Consultado el 3.II.2015)
• (2013) Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching: Culminating Findings from the MET Project's Three-year Study Policy and Practice Brief, , http://www.metproject.org/downloads/MET_Ensuring_Fair_and_Reliable_Measures_Practitioner_Brief.pdf, MET project Bill y Melinda Gates Foundation (Consultado el 3.II.2015)
• (2010) PISA 2009 Informe Español, , MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN (Madrid, Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Formatión Profesional. Instituto de Evaluatión)
• Moreno, M.V., Quesada, C., Pineda, P., (2010) El «grupo de Trabajo» Como Método Innovador de Formatión del Profesorado para Potenciar la Transferencia del Aprendizaje, Revista Española de Pedagogia, 68 (246), pp. 281-296
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., Barber, M., (2010) How the Worlds Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better, , http://www.mckinsey.com/chentservice/Social_Sector/our_practices/Education/Knowledge_Highlights/How%20School%20Systems%20Get%20Better.aspx, (McKinsey y Company) (Consultado el 3.II.2015)
• OECD, (2009) Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS, , (Paris, OECD)
• Rutwoski, L., (2013) Teaching and Learning International Survey. TALIS 2013 Conceptual Framework, , http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/TALIS%20Conceptual%20Framework_FINAL.pdf, (Paris, OCDE) (Consultado el 1.II.2015)
• Tang, S.Y.F., Chow, A.W.K., Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework (2007) Teaching and Teacher Education, p. 23
• Tejedor, F.J., García-Valcárcel, A., (2010) Evaluatión del Desempeño Docente, Revista Espanola de Pedagogía, 68 (247), pp. 439-459
• Velicer, W.F., Eaton, C.A., Fava, J.L., Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components (2000) Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment, pp. 41-71. , GOFFIN, R. D. y HELMES, E. (eds.) Springer-Verlag
• Wood, J.M., Tataryn, D.J., Gorsuch, R.L., Effects of under and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation (1996) Psychological Methods, 1, pp. 354-365
• Zwick, W.R., Velicer, W.F., (1986) Comparison of Five Rules for Determining the Number of Components to Retain, 99, pp. 432-442. , Psychological Bulletin