La producción del espacio social en la Amazonía brasileña a través de las represas hidroeléctricasEl caso del conflicto de Belo Monte

  1. Ismael de la Villa Hervás 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Relaciones internacionales

ISSN: 1699-3950

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Un debate global sobre el agua: enfoques actuales y casos de estudio

Issue: 45

Pages: 185-204

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15366/RELACIONESINTERNACIONALES2020.45.008 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Relaciones internacionales

Abstract

During the last decades in Brazil there has been a significant increase in hydrosocial conflicts due to the construction of large hydroelectric complexes, which involve qualitative and quantitative changes regarding access and ownership of water. It has opened a new period of accumulation and transformation of production relations through the commodification of this important resource. This has seen the extension of large projects of an extractivist nature in the Amazon region, especially from the end of the eighties of last century, after the settlement of the so-called Washington consensus. This phenomenon led to a whole series of transformations in productive, reproductive and social relations, in order to provide mechanisms for regional and national integration, as well as for overcoming accumulation crises emanating from the global scale. In the Brazilian case, these reforms undertaken in recent decades in the political, social, environmental, economic and legislative realms, have not meant a major change in the productive level of the world-economy scale, since the peripheral role of the country, initiated during the colonial period, is still maintained. But they have deepened their dependence through the extractivist development model, highlighting among other practices (such as the advance of the agricultural frontier, large soybean crops, the deployment of fracking to increase income derived from hydrocarbons, etc. .) the large hydroelectric complexes located throughout the country’s vast hydrographic basin. The main goal of this kind of new structure is to produce higher levels of energy, largely dedicated to the processing of aluminium, whose demand has increased exponentially in recent years in states such as China, among other members of BRICS . From all these hydroelectric structures, probably the one that stands out the most is the Belo Monte dam on the Xingú river, near to the city of Altamira, due it its importance and expansion over time. A multiplicity of actors are involved in this one (indigenous communities, fishing farmers, the State, Eletrobras, non-governmental organizations, indigenous confederations, construction companies, supranational institutions, etc.), and whose dispute over access to water resources implies a modification of the configuration of the power relations that take place in the territory. In spite of the fact that its planning began in 1975, within the framework of the search for a better use of the country’s hydroelectric potential and to boost economic development and energy sovereignty, the advances and setbacks in the settlement of the operation of the infrastructure have been delayed until today and probably will continue in the near future. This paper not only aims to analyze the spatio-temporal path of this controversial conflict, but proposes two additional objectives. On the one hand, the elaboration of a theoretical framework that combines the perspectives of the production of nature, the production of space and the construction of scale, which could be applied to the analysis of other environmental conflicts that take place in the global south. On the other hand, and as a consequence of its use in this particular case, it seeks to determine the strengths and weaknesses of this theoretical framework for future similar work. Hitherto the majority of the works and papers related to this case study are focused on the contentious politics of social movements and communities to stop the development of the project. A significant number also analyze the contradictions of PT through the Brazilian state regarding the different social impacts of the dam. This article aims to go further and provide tools and categories to explain the practices, relations and structures which are involved this process. In view of this, a methodology based on bibliographic review, and the use of both primary and secondary sources is proposed. Through this method, it is possible to outline the set of practices, representations and relationships that shape the conflict itself. In turn, to achieve this end, the article is divided into four main parts. In the first, an articulation approach is developed between the different categories and aspects of the theoretical gazes for their uses in the case study. In relation with the perspective of the production of nature, originally developed by Neil Smith, the categories of use value and exchange value are fundamental. These, through their dialectic within relations of production, modify through the passing of time the metabolism that takes place between nature and society itself, generating conflicts where these changes imply a clash between two modes of production. With this fact different values prevail over the environmental resources, whose access is sought to continue the process of social reproduction. In addition to this, the proposed framework take in count the categories of spatial practices, representations of space and spaces of representation, formulated by Henri Lefebvre, in order to explain how changes in power relations involve changes in the space in which they are inserted and vice versa. Furthermore, with the interscalar perspective proposed by several scholars that are mentioned, the possibility of explaining how phenomena and actors from different scales influence the local one during the long development of the conflict. Subsequently, in the second section of the paper, the analysis of the spatio-temporal development of the conflict is carried out, from the beginning of project planning, through the modifications carried out by the different governments, the changes in the positions of the actors, the different law resolutions, the granting of licenses and so on, until today. Thirdly, the role of hegemonic actors in advancing the construction of the hydroelectric complex is explained and detailed, for which it is not only important to analyze the different representations and narratives carried out by different governments with respect to the project of Belo Monte, but also how state hydroelectric companies (Eletrobras and Eletronorte) are affected by the entrance of foreign capital, changing over time the spatial practices that are carried out, as well as the different positions of the institution responsible for the granting of environmental licenses to allow the dam activity (IBAMA). At the end, in the last part, the same operation is made but with the subordinate actors involved, which basically would be the local and foreign non-governmental organizations, as well as the communities of indigenous, peasant and fishermen of the locality. For them, the river fundamentally supposes a use value insofar as it is used as a source of resources and transportation to maintain pre-capitalist production relations on which they are sustained. Obviously these activities have a low exchange value produced through its limited technology to harvesting and fishing, that finally are destined for local trade. The main results which can be highlighted are related with how this dam in particular, and the different hydroelectric projects in general along the region, allow to extend spatially an economic integration through the deployment of new relations of production and mechanisms for accumulation. These ones suppose an appearance of new use values, exchange values and values that clash against the previous ones thus producing the social struggle in the local scale around the dam. Furthermore, the frameworks of the scale and the production of social space show as useful theories for its application to future cases of environmental conflicts, meanwhile the production of nature framework shows some difficulties in order to use some of its categories for the case study.

Bibliographic References

  • Altvater, E. (2006). ¿Existe un marxismo ecológico? En Boron, A.; Amadeo, J. y González S. (Comp): La teoría marxista hoy: problemas y perspectivas. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
  • Amin, S. (1972). Underdevelopment and dependence in Black Africa—origins and contemporary forms. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 10 (4), 503-524. DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X00022801
  • Anderson, P. (2019). Brasil: una excepción (1964-2019). Madrid: Akal.
  • Andreucci, D., García-Lamarca, M., Wedekind, J. ySwyngedouw, E. (2017). “Value grabbing”: A political ecology of rent. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28 (3), 28-47. DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027
  • Arboleda, M. (2016). Spaces of extraction, metropolitan explosions: planetary urbanization and the commodity boom in Latin America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40 (1), 96-112. DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12290
  • Boito, A. y Berringer, T. (2013). Classes sociais, neodesenvolvimentismo e política externa nos governos Lula e Dilma. Revista de Sociología e Política, 47, 31-38. Recuperado de: http://https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/34470/21378 (01/12/2019).
  • Briassoulis, H. (2019). Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches. Charleston: Regional Research Institute of West Virginia University.
  • Brown, J. C. y Purcell, M. (2005). There’s nothing inherent about scale: political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum, 36 (5), 607-624. DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.09.001
  • Burkett, P. (2013). Marxism and ecological economics. Boston: Aakar Books.
  • Castree, N. (2005). Differential geographies: place, indigenous rights and ‘local’ resources. Political geography, 23 (2), 133-167. DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.09.010
  • Castree, N. (2008). The production of nature. En Sheppard, E. y T. J. Barnes (Comp.). A companion to economic geography. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Centro da Memória da Eletricidade no Brasil (1996). Notas sobre o racionamento de energia elétrica no Brasil (1940-1980). Río de Janeiro: Centro da Memória da Eletricidade no Brasil.
  • Centro da memória da eletricidade no Brasil (2004). Eletronorte 30 anos de pura energia brasileira. Río de Janeiro: Centro da Memória da Eletricidade no Brasil.
  • Corrêa, SRM (2016). Neodevelopment y conflictos sociales: el caso de la presa de Belo Monte. Nuevos cuadernos NAEA , 19 (3), 233-254. DOI: 10.5801/ncn.v19i3.2610
  • Daly, H. E. (1989). Economía, ecología y ética. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • De Souza Porto, M. F. (2018). ¿Desarrollo para qué y para quién? La experiencia del Mapa de Conflictos relacionados con la injusticia ambiental y la salud en Brasil. Commons: Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 7 (1), 193-221. Recuperado de: https://revistas.uca.es/pre/index.php/cayp/article/view/4067 (01/12/2019)
  • Dos Santos, R. S. P. y Milanez, B. (2013). Neoextrativismo no Brasil? Uma análise da proposta do novo marco legal da mineração. Revista Pós Ciências Sociais, 10 (19), 119-148. Recuperado de: http://www.periodicoseletronicos.ufma.br/index.php/rpcsoc/article/view/1940 (01/12/2019).
  • Dutt, A. K. y Krishna, D. A. (1990). Growth, distribution and uneven development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Loftus, A. y Ekers, M. (2013). Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn? Progress in Human Geography, 37 (2), 234-252. DOI: 10.1177/0309132512448831
  • Fainguelernt, M. (2013). Belo Monte: Reflexiones críticas sobre la trayectoria histórica del proyecto de la hidroeléctrica y los escollos de las licencias ambientales en el Brasil. Bienes comunes. Saqueo y resistencias, 131-141. Recuperado de: http://pim.udelar.edu.uy/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2017/03/Revista-Contrapunto-2.pdf (01/12/2019).
  • Fearnside, P. M. (2006). Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil’s hydroelectric development of the Xingu River Basin. Environmental management, 38 (1), 16. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0113-6
  • Fearnside, P. M. (2016). Environmental and social impacts of hydroelectric dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the aluminum industry. World Development, 77, 48-65. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.015
  • Fearnside, PM. (2017). Belo Monte: Actores y argumentos en la lucha por la represa amazónica más controvertida de Brasil. DIE ERDE - Revista de la Sociedad Geográfica de Berlín, 148 (1), 14-26. Recuperado de: https://revista.fct.unesp.br/index.php/nera/article/view/5691 (01/12/2019).
  • Fernandes, F.A. (2005). Revolução Burguesa no Brasil: ensaio de interpretação sociológica. São Paulo: Globo.
  • Fleury, LC. (2013). Conflicto ambiental y cosmopolítico en la Amazonía brasileña: la construcción de la central hidroeléctrica Belo Monte en perspectiva (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad Porto Alegre. Recuperado de: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/90184 (01/12/2019).
  • Fleury, LC. (2014). Disputas cosmopolíticas y conflictos ambientales en la Amazonía brasileña, desde la construcción de la Central Hidroeléctrica Belo Monte. Actas REACT-Reunión de Antropología de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, 1 (1). Recuperado de: http://ocs.ige.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/react/article/view/1192
  • Frank, A. G. (1971). Development of underdevelopment. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • FUNAI (2009). UHE Belo Monte. Componente Indígena. Informe técnico nº 21. Brasilia: FUNAI. Recuperado de: http://www.funai.gov.br/index.php/servicos/publicacoes (01/12/2019).
  • García Linera, A. (2013). Geopolítica de la Amazonia. La Paz: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
  • Hall, A. y Branford, S. (2012). Development, dams and Dilma: the saga of Belo Monte. Critical Sociology, 38 (6), 851-862. DOI: 10.1177/0896920512440712
  • Harvey, D. (2007a). Breve historia del neoliberalismo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
  • Harvey, D. (2007b). Espacios del capital. Hacia una geografía crítica. Madrid: Akal.
  • Heynen, N., Perkins, H. A., y Roy, P. (2006). The political ecology of uneven urban green space: The impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review, 42 (1), 3-25. DOI:10.1177/1078087406290729
  • Hughes, J. (2000). Ecology and historical materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Issberner, L. R. y Léna, P. (2017). Brazil in the anthropocene: conflicts between predatory development and environmental policies. Nueva York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Jessop, B. (2007). State power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Kelly, P. F. (1999). The geographies and politics of globalization. Progress in Human Geography, 23 (3), 379-400. DOI: 10.1177/030913259902300303
  • Kingsford, R. T. (2000). Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology, 25 (2), 109-127. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x
  • Klein, P. T. (2015). Engaging the Brazilian state: the Belo Monte dam and the struggle for political voice. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42 (6), 1137-1156. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2014.991719
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in human geography, 24 (2), 219-242. DOI:10.1191/030913200674086272
  • Martínez Alier, J., y Jusmet, J. R. (2015). Economía ecológica y política ambiental. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • McKibben, B. (1989). The end of nature. Nueva York: Random House Incorporated.
  • Moore, J. W. (2011). Transcending the metabolic rift: a theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38 (1), 1-46. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538579
  • O'Connor, J. (2001). Causas naturales: ensayos de marxismo ecológico. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.
  • Pase, H. L., Rocha, H. J. D., Santos, E. R. D. y Patella, A. P. D. (2016). The sociopolitical conflict in hydroelectric enterprises. Ambiente & Sociedade, 19 (2), 45-66. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422ASOC135480V1922016
  • Peet, R. y Watts, M. (2004). Liberation ecologies: environment, development and social movements. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Peters, I. (2017). Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements: How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict. Berlín: Springer.
  • Poulantzas, N. A. (2000). State, power, socialism. Londres: Verso.
  • Prudham, S. (2007). The fictions of autonomous invention: accumulation by dispossession, commodification and life patents in Canada. Antipode, 39 (3), 406-429. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00533.x
  • Ramos, A. M. y Alves, H. P. (2018). Socio-economic and environmental conflict over the construction of Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant. Desenvolvimento e meio ambiente, 46, 174-196. DOI: 10.5380/dma.v46i0.50248
  • Randell, H. (2016). Structure and agency in development-induced forced migration: The case of Brazil’s Belo Monte Dam. Population and environment, 37 (3), 265-287. DOI: 10.1007/s11111-015-0245-4
  • Redclift, M. (1991). The multiple dimensions of sustainable development. Geography, 36-42. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40572018 (01/12/2019)
  • República Federativa do Brasil (2011). Comunidades Tradicionais da Bacia do Rio Xingu, Pará. Informações do Estado Brasileiro, CIDH-MC-382-10. Brasília. Recuperado de: https://documentacao.socioambiental.org/noticias/anexo_noticia/19927_20110517_104210.pdf (01/12/2019).
  • Riethof, M. (2017). The international human rights discourse as a strategic focus in socio-environmental conflicts: the case of hydro-electric dams in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21 (4), 482-499. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2016.1191775
  • Sachs, W. (1997). Development dictionary, The: A guide to knowledge as power. Londres: Orient Blackswan.
  • Saraiva de Paula, A. (2005). Análise do projeto Belo Monte e de sua rede de transmissão associada frente às políticas energéticas do Brasil. En Seva Filhó, A. (Org.). Alertas sobre as conseqüências dos projetos hidrelétricos no rio Xingu. Sao Paulo: Red Internacional de Ríos.
  • Schmidt, A. (2013). The concept of nature in Marx. Londres: Verso Trade.
  • Shields, R. (2005). Lefebvre, love and struggle: Spatial dialectics. Londres: Routledge.
  • Simmel, G. (2010). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Nueva York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Simon, J. L. (1997). The ultimate resource. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Smith, N. (2010). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Londres: Verso.
  • Svampa, M. (2013). Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Fundación Friedrich Ebert; Nueva Sociedad, 4, 30-46. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6451 (01/12/2019).
  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local:'Glocalization' and the politics of scale. En Cox, K. R. (Ed.). Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local (pp.115-136). Londres: Guilford Press.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2006). Circulations and metabolisms:(hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. Science as culture, 15 (2), 105-121. DOI: 10.1080/09505430600707970
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydro?social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142 (1), 56-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2009.00054.x
  • Swyngedouw, E. y Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35 (5), 898-918. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x
  • Swyngedouw, E., Kaika, M. y Castro, E. (2002). Urban water: a political-ecology perspective. Built Environment, 124-137. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23288796 (01/12/2019).
  • Taylor, P. J. (1982). A materialist framework for political geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 7, 15-34. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/621909 (01/12/2019).
  • Vainer, CB (2007). Planificación territorial y proyecto nacional: los desafíos de la fragmentación. Revista Brasileña de Estudios Urbanos y Regionales, 9 (1), 9-23. DOI: 10.22296/2317-1529.2007v9n1p9
  • Wallerstein, I. M. (2004). Capitalismo histórico y movimientos antisistémicos: un análisis de sistemas-mundo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
  • Warner, J. F. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1 (2), 271-288. Recuperado de: https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/contested-hydrohegemony-hydraulic-control-and-security-in-turkey (01/12/2019).
  • Watts, M. (2015). Now and then: the origins of political ecology and the rebirth of adaptation as a form of thought. En Perreault, T., Bridge, G. y McCarthy, J. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of political ecology. Londres: Routledge.
  • Williamson, J. (1993). Democracy and the “Washington consensus”. World development, 21 (8), 1329-1336. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(93)90046-C
Data source: Dialnet