Procesamiento de Oraciones de Relativo en Español como Lengua Extranjera

  1. María Guijarro Sanz 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista Nebrija de Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de Lenguas

ISSN: 1699-6569

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 15

Número: 31

Páginas: 146-160

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.26378/RNLAEL1531455 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Nebrija de Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de Lenguas

Resumen

El procesamiento cognitivo del lenguaje es un ámbito de la psicolingüística en pleno auge cuyos hallazgos pueden ayudar al desarrollo de la enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. En este artículo se abordan algunas de las posibles aplicaciones del procesamiento cognitivo en la enseñanza de construcciones de relativo para estudiantes de español como lengua extranjera. En concreto, se tratan los conceptos de animacidad y de relación de dependencias y cómo inciden ambos en la enseñanza de oraciones de relativo en español como lengua extranjera y como lengua materna.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Betancort, M., Carreiras, M., & Sturt, P. (2009). The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: An eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1915-1929.
  • Calero Fernández, Mª Ángeles et al. [en línea]. Corpus de Interlengua Española de Aprendices Sinohablantes.
  • Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Vergara, M., De La Cruz-Pavía, I., & Laka, I. (2010). Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque. Cognition, 115(1), 79-92.
  • Chen, B., Ning, A., Bi, H., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. Acta Psychologica, 129(1), 61-65.
  • Ellis, N. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164-194.
  • Forster, R., & Corrêa, L. M. S. (2017). On the asymmetry between subject and object relative clauses in discourse context. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 25(3),1225-1254.
  • Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5(4), 519-559.
  • Gibson, E., Desmet, T., Grodner, D., Watson, D., & Ko, K. (2001). Reading relative clauses in English. In: MIT manuscript.
  • Gibson, E., & Wu, H.-H. I. (2013). Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1-2), 125-155.
  • Guijarro Sanz, M. (2021). Fossilized mistakes in Spanish relative clauses learned by Chinese students. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021.0062
  • Guijarro Sanz, M. (2021). Propuesta cognitiva de oraciones de relativo para sinohablantes. Revista de Enseñanza de Español a Sinohablantes, Sinoele, 21, 13. doi:doi 10.29606/SinoELE.202112_(21).0003
  • Han, Z., & Odlin, T. (2006). Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition: Multilingual Matters.
  • He, W., & Chen, B. (2013). The role of animacy in Chinese relative clause processing. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 145-153.
  • Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90(1), 3-27.
  • Hsiao, Y., & MacDonald, M. C. (2016). Production predicts comprehension: Animacy effects in Mandarin relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 87-109.
  • Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movementin English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21(2), 121-151.
  • Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic inquiry, 63-99.
  • King, J., & Just, M. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580-602.
  • Krch, D. (2011). Cognitive Processing. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology(pp. 627-627). New York, NY: Springer New York.
  • Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50-68.
  • Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2006). Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 466-490.
  • O’Grady, W. (2008). Language without grammar. In P. R. a. N. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics for Second Language Acquisition.
  • Pütz, M., & Sicola, L. (2010). Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: inside the learner's mind(Vol. 13): John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Qiao, X., Shen, L., & Forster, K. (2012). Relative clause processing in Mandarin: Evidence from the maze task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(4), 611-630.
  • Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 1-23.
  • Rezaeian, M., Sadighi, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2018). The role of animacy andlanguage proficiency in the comprehension of English restrictive relative clauses by Iranian EFL learners: an emergentist approach. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1-19.
  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention in P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Applied Linguistics.
  • Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kuhn, K. (1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), 499-520.
  • Street, J. A. (2017). This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of Object Relative Clauses by native and non-native speakers of English. Language sciences, 59, 192-203.
  • Sung, Y.-T., Cha, J.-H., Tu, J.-Y., Wu, M.-D., & Lin, W.-C. (2016). Investigating the processing of relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese: evidence from eye-movement data. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 45(5), 1089-1113.
  • Talmy, L. (2008). Aspects of attention in language. In P. R. y. N. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. NY: Routledge.
  • Ting, W., Ho, W.-C., Littrell, R., Fengshu, L., Dow, E., Ouyang, H. H., . . . Griñán, A. J. S. (2017). Qué saber para enseñar a estudiantes chinos(Vol. 1): Parolas Languages via PublishDrive.
  • Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69-90.
  • VanPatten, B., & Jegerski, J. (2010). Research in second language processingand parsing(Vol. 53): John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Wen, Z., & Mota, M. B. (2015). Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing: Channel View Publications.
  • Yao, Q., & Renaud, C. (2016). Processing Chinese relative clauses: An investigation of second-language learners from different learning contexts. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5(2), 155-186.
  • Young, S. K. (2018). Relation between Frequency and Processing Difficulty of English Relative Clauses by L2 Learners: A Learner Corpus Analysis. 언어연구, 34(3), 491-504.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet