Smart cities through the lenses of public policythe case of Shangai

  1. Olga Gil 1
  2. Tian-Cheng Zheng 1
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Revista:
Revista española de ciencia política

ISSN: 1575-6548

Año de publicación: 2015

Número: 38

Páginas: 63-84

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de ciencia política

Resumen

Este artículo explora la utilidad del modelo desarrollado por Chourabi et al. (2012) para explicar la realidad urbana de Shanghai en China. Se examinan las ocho variables incluidas en el modelo, para el caso de la ciudad de Shanghai: 1) gobernanza y planificación urbana, 2) gestión y organización, 3) tecnología, 4) contexto político 5) personas y comunidades, 6) economía, 7) infraestructura construida y 8) medio ambiente. Los resultados destacan que para Shanghai, el plan de ciudad inteligente es heredero de un proceso de transformación que tiene lugar desde comienzos de la década de 1990 en cuatro áreas de políticas públicas: gobernanza, tecnología, infraestructura construida y economía. El plan de Shanghai ciudad inteligente es peculiar para la variable gestión y organización y muestra capacidad para desarrollar un contexto político favorable respecto al gobierno central. Sin embargo, se encuentran limitaciones en la capacidad de cambio que inducen las variables personas y comunidades y medio ambiente. El modelo contribuye a ampliar la aplicación de la teoría y el análisis urbano comparado más allá de casos en Europa occidental y Norteamérica, al contexto de Asia, permitiendo ampliar la comparación entre ciudades. Se concluye avanzado que los resultados alcanzados pueden ser punto de partida para completar nuevos programas de investigación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alawadhi, Suha et al. 2012. "Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives", in Hans Scholl et al. (eds.). EGOV 2012. IFIP.
  • Allwinkle, Sam and Peter Cruickshank. 2011. "Creating smart-er cities: An overview", Journal of urban technology, 18 (2): 1-16.
  • Caragliu, Andrea; Chiara del Bo and Peter Nijkamp. 2011. "Smart cities in Europe", Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2): 65-82.
  • Chourabi, Hafedh et al. 2012. Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii, International Conference on System Sciences. Published by Computer society. IEEE.
  • Deakin, Mark and Sam Allwinkle. 2007. "Urban Regeneration and Sustainable Communities: The Role Networks, Innovation, and Creativity in Building Successful Partnerships", Journal of Urban Technology, 14 (1): 77-91.
  • Deakin, Mark and Husam Al Waer. 2011. "From intelligent to smart cities", Intelligent Buildings International, 3: 133-139.
  • Deakin, Mark, 2010. 'SCRAN's development of a trans-national comparator for the standardisation of e-government services', in Christopher G. Reddick (ed.), Comparative eGovernment: An Examination of E-Government Across Countries. Berlin: Springer/ Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And how It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Florida, Richard. 2005. The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. New York: Harper and Collins.
  • Ganapati, Sukumar. 2013. "The State of Smart Cities" presented at the 9th Transatlantic Dialog: Rebuilding Capacities for Urban Governance, Workshop 5: Cities of the future: How can technology make urban living and governance smarter? Baltimore, June 12-15.
  • Gil, Olga and Navarro, Carmen. 2013. "Innovations of Governance in Cities and Urban regions: Smart Cities in China, Iskandar (Malaysia), Japan, New York and Tarragona (Spain)", EURA Conference: Cities as Sheedbeds for Innovation. 4-6 July, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Gil- García, J. Ramón and Theresa Pardo. 2005. "E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations", Government Information Quarterly, 22 (2): 187-216.
  • Hall, Peter. 1988. Cities of tomorrow. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Harrison, Colin, and Ian Donnelly. 2011. A theory of smart cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, Hull, UK (1): 1-15.
  • Hollands, Robert. 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?", City, 12 (3): 303-320.
  • Komninos, Nicos. 2009. "Intelligent cities: towards interactive and global innovation environments", International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1 (4): 337-355.
  • Lin, George. 2002. "The growth and structural change of Chinese cities: a contextual and geographic analysis", Cities, 19 (5): 299-316.
  • Lin, George. 2007. "Reproducing Spaces of Chinese Urbanisation: New City-based and Land-centred Urban Transformation", Urban Studies, 44 (9): 1827-1855.
  • Lin, Justin YiFu. 2014. New Structural Economics. Conference at Banco de España, Madrid, March 25th.
  • Lin, Justin YiFu. 2014. "The Washington Consensus revisited: a new structural economic perspective", Journal of Economic policy Reform. DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2014.9 36439
  • Liu, C. Yang. 2012. "From Los Angeles to Shanghai: Testing the Applicability of Five Urban Paradigms", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (36): 1127-1145.
  • Liu, Pu and Zhenghong Peng. 2013. "Smart Cities in China". Mimeo. Forthcoming at IEEE Computer Society.
  • Mossberger, Karen. 2013. "Urban leadership and innovation", keynote at EURA conference Cities as Sheedbeds for Innovation. 4-6 July, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Mossberger, Karen, Caroline Tolbert and William Franko. 2012. Digital Cities: The Internet and the Geography of Opportunity. Cambrigde: Oxford University Press.
  • Nam, Taewoo and Theresa Pardo. 2011 "Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions", in Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. New York: ACM Digital Library.
  • Paskaleva, Krassimira. 2009. "Enabling the smart city: The progress of city e-governance in Europe", International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1 (4): 405-422.
  • Rifkin, Jeremy. 2011. The Third Industrial Revolution; How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. USA: Palgrave Mcmillan.
  • Robinson, Jennifer. 2014. "Introduction to a Virtual Issue on Comparative Urbanism", International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Early online version. 1-13. Doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12171
  • Schaffers, Hans et al. 2011. "Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation", in The future Internet. 431-446. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. Shanghai Smart City Plan. http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/shanghai/node27118/node27973/u22ai70898.html. [Last access November, 12, 2014].
  • Shapiro, Jesse. 2006. "Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (2): 324-335.
  • Shen, Li-Yin et al. 2011. "The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices", Habitat International, 35: 17-29.
  • Taylor, Peter et al. 2014. "City-Dyad Analyses of China's Integration into the World City Network", Urban Studies, 51 (5): 868-882.
  • Winters, John. 2011. "Why are Smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays", Journal of Regional Science, 51 (2): 253-270.
  • Yusuf, Shahid and Weiping Wu. 2002. "Pathways to a World City: Shanghai Rising in an Era of Globalisation", Urban Studies, 39 (7): 1213-1240.