El significado polisémico del concepto de museo

  1. Hernández Hernández, Francisca 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Complutum

ISSN: 1131-6993,  1988-2327

Any de publicació: 2021

Títol de l'exemplar: Patrimonio Arqueológico: una apuesta por el cambio de modelo social. Homenaje a María Ángeles Querol

Volum: 32

Número: 2

Pàgines: 417-425

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5209/CMPL.78568 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Complutum

Resum

Starting from the polysemic meaning that the concept museum has, it is possible to ask whether or not it is necessary to redefine the term museum from a deeper perspective and according to post-modernity. In the face of a constantly changing world, it is worth asking a series of questions about the why and for what of the museum's existence. It will be necessary to review the European centered character of the museum to open it to more universal and pluralist paradigms, where other ways of understanding it can be found from contexts not subject to colonialist regulations. This must lead to the creation of a museum that is more open to divergent and creative discourses that create the space necessary to face the new challenges that globalized society presents to us. The answer to some of the questions that we ask ourselves today about the museum allows us to see that the museum does not allow itself to be enclosed in a single and definitive definition.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Asuaga, C.; Ransell Köster, P. (2006). Un Análisis de la Gestión de las instituciones culturales: El caso específico de los museos. Revista Iberoamericana de Contabilidad de Gestión, nº 6: 1-14.
  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Tiempos líquidos: vivir una época de incertidumbre. Tusquets Editores, Barcelona.
  • Boucher, L. N. (2000). Vivre. S’inspirer du passé pour composer l’avenir. ICOFOM Study Series, 32, 27-34.
  • Chakrabati, M. (2005). Changing concepts of museum and museology. Journal of the Department of Museology, Vol. 4, 32-39. University of Calcutta.
  • Cervantes Saavedra, M. de (2006) [1617]. Los trabajos de Persiles y Sigismunda. Madrid: Juan de la Cueva. Texto preparado por Enrique Suárez Figaredo. [URL: https://cesarcallejas.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/suarez_figaredo_persiles.pdf]. Acceso el 5/12/2020.
  • DANA, J. C. (1917). The Gloom of the Museum. Nº 2 of the New Museum Series. The Tree Press, Woodstock, Vermont. [URL: https://archive.org/stream/newmuseum01danagoog#page/n8/mode/2up]. Acceso el 9/06/2017.
  • Desbiolles, B. (2009). L´institution du musée: concepts, enjeux et perspectives: Black to Basics. ICOFOM Study Series, Issue 38, 181-198. Musée royal de Mariemont, Morlanwelz (Belgique).
  • Díaz Balerdi, I. (2008). La memoria fragmentada. El mundo y sus paradojas. Trea, Gijón.
  • Escudero, S.; Panozzo Zenere, A. (2015). Museos, capitalismo y teoría museológica. Un punteo de enfoques críticos aplicados a la museología. Actas del XXII Encuentro del ICOFOM LAM. Nuevas tendencias para la museología en Latinoamérica. ICOFOM LAM. Subcomité de Teoría Museológica para América Latina y el Caribe, Buenos Aires:153-169.
  • Folga-Januszewska, D. (2020): History of the Museum Concept and Contemporary Challenges: Introduction into the Debate on the New ICOM Museum Definition. Muzealnictwo, 61: 37-59.
  • Galla, A. (2013/2014). El museo inclusivo. Museos.es. Revista de la Subdirección de Museos Estatales, nº 9-10: 40-53.
  • Laiishun, A. (2016). The chinese museum: Transformation and change through ethics construction. Museums, Ethics and Cultural Heritage (Bernice L. M., ed.). The International Council of Museums (ICOM). Routledge, London and New York: 173-180.
  • LU, T. L. D. (2014). Museums in China, Power, Politics and Identity. Routledge, New York.
  • Message, K. (2018): The Disobedient Museum. Writing at the Edge. Routledge, London-New York.
  • Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Duke University Press, Durham.
  • Mizushima, E. (2016): Ethics, Museology and Professional Training in Japan. Museums, Ethics and Cultural Heritage (B. L. Murphy, ed.). The International Council of Museums (ICOM), Routledge, New York: 181-190.
  • Morishita, M. (2010). The Empty Museum. Western Cultures and the Artistic Field in Modern Japan. Ashgate, Farnham.
  • Ngcobo, A. (2018). The Politics of Representation in South African Museums. The Politics and Poetics of Museology. Icofom Study Series, Vol. 46, 147-166.
  • Schuster, J. M. (1998). Neither Public Nor Private: The Hybridization of Museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, Volume 22, Issue 2-3: 127-150.
  • Šola, T. S. (2015). Mnemosophy. An Essay On The Science Of Public Memory. European Heritage Association, Zagreb.
  • Taylor, F. H. (1945). Babel ́s Tower: The Dilemma of the Modern Museum. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Teather, L. (2000). Transforming the Muse: Museological Considerations for Working with Pluralism. In D. Goa, Cultural Diversity Book. Ottawa, CMA. [URL: http://www.academia.edu/789051/Teather_L._Transforming_the_Muse_Museological_Considerations_for_Working_with_Pluralism._Cultural_Diversity_Book_ed._David_Goa_Ottawa_CMA_._2000]. Acceso el 11/05/2018.
  • Yoshida, K. (2004). El Museo y el Patrimonio Cultural Inmaterial. Museum International, 221-222: 110-115
  • Edson, G. (2007). Définir le musée. Vers une redéfinition du musée (F. Mairesse, A. Desvallées, eds.). L´Harmattan, Paris: 37-48.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet