La gramática de construcciones. Una mirada externa

  1. Bosque, Ignacio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Zeitschrift:
Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics

ISSN: 1893-3211

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Titel der Ausgabe: The grammar of clitics

Ausgabe: 10

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 1-41

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.7557/1.10.1.5804 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics

Zusammenfassung

This article analyzes Construction Grammar as a theoretical framework, as well as some of its connections with other approaches, both ancient and modern. The goal of this work is not to oppose this model as a whole or to defend an alternative theory to it, but to evaluate its positive aspects and at the same time highlight those that areproblematic, from the perspective of a non-constructivist linguist. Among the merits of this theoretical framework, the scalar or gradual conception of compositionality stands out, with importantconsequences for the lexicon-syntax relationship. Among the less positive aspects, one can highlight the attribution of meaning to constructions themselves, as well as the difficulties that the model presents to incorporate syntactic relationships that are established at a distance

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Abeillé, Anne & Robert D. Borsley. 2008. Comparative Correlatives and Parameters. Lingua 118: 1139-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.02.001
  • Adger, David. 2013a. Constructions and Grammatical Explanation: Comments on Goldberg. Mind and Language 28/4: 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12027
  • Adger, David. 2013b. Constructions are not Explanations. Lingbuzz 001675. Accesible en http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001675
  • Andueza, Patricia, 2011. Rhetorical Exclamative in Spanish. Tesis doctoral inédita, Ohio-State University. Accesible en línea.
  • Bally, Charles. 1921. Traité de stylistique française. 2 vols. París: Klincksieck.
  • Barrios, M. Auxiliadora. 2007. A Tool for Learning Routines. En C. Gitsaky (ed.), Language and Languages. Global and Local Tensions, 90-113. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Barrios, M. Auxiliadora. 2017. Hacia un concepto amplio de pragmatema y sus aplicaciones en ELE: el caso de ¡qué + sust./adj.! En B. Almeida y otros (eds.), Investigaciones actuales en Lingüística. Vol. II: Semántica, Lexicología y Morfología, 19-35. Alcalá: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. Accesible en línea.
  • Barrios, M. Auxiliadora & Vanesa Ovejas. 2019. Pragmatèmes: concept, limites et formalisation. Cahiers de lexicologie, 115/22: 77-102.
  • Becerra, María Isabel & José Manuel Igoa. 2013. La intención irónica en las hipérboles y las preguntas retóricas en español. Forma y Función 26/2: 99-124.
  • Beckner, Clay & Joan Bybee. 2009. A Usage-based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis. Language Learning 59: 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x
  • Beinhauer, Werner. 1963. El español coloquial. Madrid: Gredos.
  • Blanco, Xavier. 2015. Les pragmatèmes: définition, typologie et traitement lexicographique. Verbum 4: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.15388/Verb.2013.4.4977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Verb.2013.4.4977
  • Blanco, Xavier & Salah Mejri. 2018. Les pragmatèmes. Paris: Classiques Garnier.
  • Boas, Hans C. 2011. Coercion and Leaking Argument Structures. Linguistics 49/6: 1271-1303. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.036
  • Boas, Hans C. (ed.). 2010. Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10
  • Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez (eds.). 2014. Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.15
  • Boas, Hans C. & Ivan Sag (eds.). 2012. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Chicago: CLSI Publications.
  • Boogaart, Ronny et al. 2014. Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar. Berlín: Mouton-De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273
  • Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.x
  • Booij, Geert. 2012. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Booij, Geert. 2013. Morphology in Construction Grammar. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0014
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2001. Sobre el concepto de 'colocación' y sus límites. Lingüística Española Actual 23/1: 9-40.
  • Bosque, Ignacio (dir.). 2004a. Redes. Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: SM.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2004b. Combinatoria y significación. Algunas reflexiones. En I. Bosque (2004a), pp. lxxvii-clxxiv.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2011. Deducing Collocations. Conferencia plenaria en el 5th International Conference on the Meaning-Text Theory (MTT-2011). En I. Boguslavsky & L. Wanner (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory, pp. vi-xxiii. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2016. Los rasgos gramaticales. En Á. Gallego (ed.), Perspectivas de sintaxis formal, 309-387. Madrid: Akal.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2017a. Spanish Exclamatives in Perspective: A Survey of Properties, Classes, and Current Theoretical Issues. En I. Bosque (ed.), Advances in the Analy-sis of Spanish Exclamatives, 11-52. Ohio: Ohio-State University Press.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2017b. On the Conceptual Bases of Collocations: Restricted Adverbs and Lexical Selection". En S. Torner & E. Bernal (eds.), Collocations and other lexical combinations in Spanish, 9-20. Londres / Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2018a. On Source Prepositions and their Relationship to Paths. En A. Leal (ed.), Verbs, Movement and Prepositions, 11-44. Oporto: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Porto.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2018b. Sintaxis sin concatenación: estructuras preposicionales con sustantivos duplicados. En I. Bosque et al. (eds.), Palabras en lluvia minuciosa. Veinte visitas a la gramática del español inspiradas por Ángela Di Tullio, 47-71. Madrid, Iberoamericana.
  • https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954877560-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954877560-005
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2019a. Sobre la naturaleza composicional de las unidades gramaticales. En D. García Padrón et al. (eds.), Clases y categorías en la semántica del español y sus interfaces, 11-46. Berlín / Boston: Mouton-De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110637700-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110637700-002
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2019b. Adverbios implicativos. En A. Briz y otros (eds.), Estudios lingüísticos en homenaje a Emilio Ridruejo, vol. 1, 137-148. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2020. On the Syntax of Spanish Unconditionals. En M. González-Rivera & S. Sessarego (eds.), Interface-Driven Phenomena in Spanish: Essays in Honor of Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 6-29. Malden, MA: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003006855-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003006855-2
  • Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
  • Bouveret, Myriam (ed.). 2012. Constructions in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.13
  • Bravo, A. 2017. Rhetorical Imperatives: Reasons to Reasoning. En D. van Olmen & S. Heinold (eds.), Imperatives and Directive Strategies, 79-109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.03bra DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.03bra
  • Bravo, Ana. 2020. Spanish Pseudo-Coordinative Periphrases. Borealis 9/1: 125-180. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.9.1.5365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/1.9.1.5365
  • Brillman. Ruth. 2017. Tough Constructions in the Context of English Infinitives. Tesis doc-toral inédita. MIT. Accesible en línea.
  • Butler, Christopher S. & Javier Martín Arista (eds.). 2008. Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107
  • Bybee, Joan 2013. Usage-Based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004
  • Bybee, Joan & David Eddington. 2006. A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of 'Becoming'" Language 82: 323-355. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081
  • Bybee, Joan & Paul J. Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: A Personal View. En A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn: Generative Linguistics, Philosophy, Mathematics, and Psychology, 3-25. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Contreras, Heles. 1993. On Null Operator Structures. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993019
  • Corver, Norbert & Henk van Riemsdijk. 2001. Semi-lexical Categories. The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words. Berlín / Boston: Mouton-De Gruter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874006
  • Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
  • Croft, William. 2004. Syntactic Theories and Syntactic Methodology: a Reply to Seuren. Journal of Linguistics 40: 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002798
  • Croft, William. 2007. Construction Grammar. En H. Cuykens & D. Geeraerts (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 463-508. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Croft, William. 2013. Radical Construction Grammar. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 211-232. Accesible en línea. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0012
  • Croft William & Logan Sutton. 2016. Construction Grammar and Lexicography. En P. Hanks Gilles & M. de Schryver (eds.), International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography, 1-12. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_99-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_99-1
  • Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
  • De Knop, Sabine & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds.). 2016. Applied Construction Grammar. Berlín / Boston: Mouton - De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268
  • De Knop, Sabine et al. (eds.). 2013, Konstruktionsgrammatik in den romanischen Spra-chen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03754-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03754-8
  • Delbecque, Nicole. 2017. Cuantificación y aspecto en la frase nominal [un caudal de N]. RILCE (Revista de Filología Hispánica) 33/3: 1091-1141. https://doi.org/10.15581/008.33.3.1091-1141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/008.33.3.1091-1141
  • Den Dikken, M. 2005. Comparative Correlatives Comparatively. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 497-532. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464377
  • DLE. Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2014. Diccionario de la lengua española, 23ª edición. Madrid: Espasa.
  • Dobrovol'skij, Dmitrij. 2016. Fraseología y Gramática de Construcciones. Language Design 18: 71-106.
  • Dowty David. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language 67: 547-619. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021
  • Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria, 1984. La interrogación retórica. Dicenda 3: 9-37.
  • Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria, 1999. Los enunciados interrogativos. Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Len-gua Española, vol. 3: 3929-3991. Madrid: Espasa.
  • Everaert, Martin et al. (eds.). 2012. The Theta-System. Argument Structure at the Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.001.0001
  • Fábregas, Antonio. 2016. On the Structure and Variation of 'hace' as a Temporal Expression. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 45: 77-108. https://doi.org/10.5774/45-0-201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5774/45-0-201
  • Fillmore, Charles. 2013. Berkeley Construction Grammar. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 111-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0007
  • Fillmore, Charles, et. al. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity on Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64/3: 501-538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
  • Fillmore, Charles et al. 1992. Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and Its Neighbors. En A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, 75-102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fillmore, Charles et al. 2012. The FrameNet Constructicon. En H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, 283-299. Stanford: CSLI.
  • Fried, Mirjam. 2015. Construction Grammar. En A. Alexiadou & T. Kiss (eds.), Syntax. Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook, 974-100. Berlín / Boston: Mou-ton de Gruyter.
  • Fried, Mirjam & Hans C. Boas (eds.). 2005. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.4
  • Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.). 2004a. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2
  • Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman. 2004b. Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch. Fried & Östman (eds.), 11-86. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.02fri DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.02fri
  • García-Page, Mario. 2007. Los pragmatemas: algunas consideraciones. En J. Cuartero Otal & M. Emsel (eds.), Vernetzungen: Bedeutung in Wort, Satz und Text. Festschrift für Gerd Wotjak zum 65. Geburtstag. Tomo 1. 161-173. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • García-Page, Mario. 2008. Introducción a la fraseología española. Estudio de las locuciones. Barcelona: Anthopos.
  • Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2003. Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7/5: 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2004. Pragmatics and Argument Structure. En L. R. Horn & G. L. Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 427-441. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch19
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2013a. Argument Structure Constructions versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates. Mind & Language, 28/4: 435-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12026
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2013b. Explanation and Constructions: Response to Adger. Mind & Language 28/4, pp. 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12028
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2013c. Constructionist Approaches. En T. Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.): 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002
  • Goldberg, Adele. 2014. Fitting a Slim Dime between the Verb Template and Argument Structure Construction Approaches. Theoretical Linguistics 40/1-2: 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0004
  • Goldberg, Adele E. 2015. Compositionality. En N. Riemer (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, 419-433. London: Routledge.
  • Goldberg, Adele & Devin Casenhiser. 2006. English Constructions. En B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. 343-355. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch15
  • Goldberg, Adele & Laura Suttle. 2010. Construction Grammar. Wire's Cognitive Science 1/4: 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.22
  • Goldberg, Adele et al. 2003. A Lexically based Proposal of Argument Sructure Meaning. En Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 39, 67-81. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Gonzálvez, Francisco. 2012. La(s) gramática(s) de construcciones. En I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano & J. Valenzuela (eds.), Lingüística cognitiva, págs. 249-280. Barcelona, Anthropos.
  • Gras, Pedro. 2010. Gramática en interacción: una propuesta desde la Gramática de Cons-trucciones. En J. Sueiro et al. (eds.), Lingüística e hispanismo, 283-298. Lugo; Axac.
  • Gras, Pedro. 2011. Gramática de construcciones en interacción: propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona.
  • Gries, Stefan T. 2019. 15 Years of Collostructions. Some long overdue Additions / Correc-tions (to / of actually all Sorts of Corpus-Linguistics Measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24/3, 385-412. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri
  • Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 2012. Interrogativas retóricas en subordinadas causales. En T. E. Jiménez Juliá et. al. (eds.), Cum corde et in nova grammatica: estudios ofreci-dos a Guillermo Rojo: 419-428. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
  • Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 1998. Rhetorical Questions, Relevance and Scales. Revista Ali-cantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 139-155. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.1998.11.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.1998.11.11
  • Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 1999. The Structure and Interpretation of Spanish Degree Neuter Constructions. Lingua 109: 35-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00011-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00011-X
  • Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2000. Two Types of Prepositional Conditionals. En H. Campos et al. (eds.), Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millennium. Papers from the 3rd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 245-263. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
  • Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2009. Correlativization and Degree Quantification in Spanish. En P. J. Masullo et al. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2007: Selected papers from the 37th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), 121-141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.304.09gut DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.304.09gut
  • Han, Chung-Hye. 2002. Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Questions. Lingua 112: 201-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4
  • Harley, Heidi. 2011. A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure. En C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, pp. 427-448. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0019
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Why Can't we Talk to Each Other? Lingua 110: 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00039-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00039-X
  • Herbst, Thomas. 2014. The Valency Approach to Argument Structure Constructions. En T. Herbst et al. (eds.). 159-2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.167
  • Herbst, Thomas et al. (eds.). 2014. Constructions Collocations Patterns. Berlín / Boston: De Gruyter, Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854
  • Hicks, Glyn. 2009. Tough-constructions and their Derivations. Linguistic Inquiry, 40:535-566. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.535
  • Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.) 2013a. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
  • Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013b. Construction Grammar: Introduction. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0001
  • Hoffmann, Thomas, et. al. 2018. The more data, the better: A Usage-Based Account of the English Comparative Correlative Construction. Cognitive Linguistics 30/1: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0036
  • Iwata, Seizi. 2006. Where do Constructions come from? English Linguistics 23: 493-533. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.23.493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.23.493
  • Iwata Seizi. 2014. Construction Grammar. En A. Carnie et al. (eds.), The Routledge Hand-book of Syntax, 647-669. Londres: Routlege.
  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2008. Construction after Construction and its Theoretical Challenges. Language 84/1: 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2008.0058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2008.0058
  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2013. Constructions in the Parallel Architecture. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0005
  • Jackendoff, Ray & Peter Culicover. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kauffer, Maurice. 2013. Le figement des «actes de langage stéréotypés» en français et en allemand. Pratiques 159-160: 42-54. Accesible en línea. https://doi.org/10.4000/pratiques.2817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/pratiques.2817
  • Kauffer, Maurice. 2019. Les "actes de langage stéréotypés". Essai de synthèse critique. Cahiers de lexicologie 114: 149-171.
  • Kay, Paul & Charles Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What's X doing Y? Construction. Language 75/1: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1999.0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1999.0033
  • Kay, Paul & Laura Michaelis. 2012. Constructional Meaning and Compositionality. En C. Maienborn et al. (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Lan-guage Meaning. vol. 3, 2271-2296. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253382.2271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253382.2271
  • Laca, Brenda. 1999. Presencia y ausencia de determinante. En I. Bosque y V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 1, 891-928. Madrid: Espasa.
  • Langacker R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker R. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Leino, Jaakko, (ed.). 2008. Constructional Reorganization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.5
  • Levin Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479
  • Longenbaugh, Nicholas. 2016. Non-Intervention in tough Constructions. En C. Hammerly & B. Prickett (eds.). Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 2, 293-307.
  • Lyngfelt, Benjamin et al. 2018. Constructicography. Constructicon Development Across Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22
  • Mairal, Ricardo & Francisco Gonzálvez. 2010. Verbos y construcciones en el espacio cognitivo-funcional del siglo XXI. En J. F. Francisco Val Álvaro & M. C. Horno Chéliz (eds.), La gramática del sentido: léxico y sintaxis en la encrucijada, 123-152. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.
  • Maranz, Alex. 2013. Verbal Argument Structure: Events and Participants. Lingua 130: 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012
  • Mateu, Jaume. 2016. La estructura argumental. En Á. Gallego (ed.), Perspectivas de sintaxis formal, 111.148. Madrid: Akal.
  • Matsuyama, Tetsuya. 2004. The 'N after N' Construction. A Constructional Idiom. English Linguistics 21: 55-84. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.21.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.21.55
  • Mel'čuk, Igor. 1995. Phrasemes in Language and Phraseology in Linguistics. En M. Everaert et al. (eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, 167-232. Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum Associates
  • Mel'čuk, Igor. 2015a. Semantics. From Meaning to Text, vol. 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Mel'čuk, Igor. 2015b. Clichés, an Understudied Subclass of Phrasemes. Yearbook of Phraseology 6/1: 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2015-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2015-0005
  • Michaelis, Laura A. 2013a. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0008
  • Michaelis, Laura A. 2013b. Construction Grammar and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. En S. Luragi & C. Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, 421-435. Londres: Bloomsbury.
  • Michaelis, Laura A. 2017. Meanings of Constructions. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accesible en línea. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.309
  • Montalbetti, Mario & Mamuro Saito. 1983. On Certain (tough) Differences between Span-ish and English. En P. Sells & C. Jones (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth annual meeting of the North East Linguistics Conference, 191-198. Amherst: Mass./ GLSA publications.
  • Newmeyer, Frederick. J. 1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Newmeyer, Frederick. J. 2003. Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language 79/4: 682-707. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0260
  • Newmeyer, Frederick. J. 2010. Formalism and Functionalism in Linguistics. Wire's Cogni-tive Science 1/3: 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.6
  • Newmeyer, Frederick. J. 2017. Form and Function in the Evolution of Grammar. Cognitive Science 41: 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12333
  • NGLE. Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Morfología y sintaxis. Dos vols. Madrid: Espasa.
  • Östman, Jan-Ola & Mirjam Fried (eds.). 2005. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Ground-ing and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3
  • Pavón Lucero, M. Victoria. 1999. Clases de partículas: preposición, conjunción y adverbio. En I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 1, 565-656. Madrid. Espasa.
  • Pavón Lucero, M. Victoria. 2012. Estructuras sintácticas en la subordinación adverbial, Madrid, Arco/Libros.
  • Pavón Lucero, M. Victoria (ed.). 2016. Las relaciones interoracionales en español. Catego-rías sintácticas y subordinación adverbial. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429213
  • Perek, Florent & Adele E. Goldberg. 2015. Generalizing Beyond the Input: The Functions of the Constructions Matter. Journal of Memory and Language 84: 108-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.006
  • Pérez Béjar. Víctor. 2018. Pragmagramática de las estructuras suspendidas. Tesis doctoral inédita. Universidad de Sevilla. Accesible en línea.
  • Polguère, Alain. 2003. Lexicologie et sémantique lexicale. Montreal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montreal.
  • Ramonda, Kris (2014). Goldberg's Construction Grammar. En J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (eds.), 60-71. The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Randall, Janet H. 2010. The Geometry of Argument Structure. Londres / Nueva York: Springer.
  • Reuland, Eric et al. (eds.) 2007. Argument Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.108
  • Rezac, Milan. 2006. On tough-Movement. En C. Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist Essays, 288-325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.91.19rez DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.91.19rez
  • Rico, Pablo. 2016. A Syntactic Approach to the Spanish al + Infinitive Construction. Bore-alis 5/1: 31-57. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.5.1.3735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/1.5.1.3735
  • Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque. 2016. Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. The Annual Review of Linguistics 2:139-63. Accesible en línea. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040827
  • Rodríguez Rosique, 2008. Pragmática y gramática: condicionales concesivas en español. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Sáez, Luis A. 1999. Los cuantificadores: las construcciones comparativas y superlativas. En I. Bosque y V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 1, 1129-1188. Madrid: Espasa.
  • Sáez, Luis A. & Cristina Sánchez López. 2013. Las construcciones comparativas. Estado de la cuestión. En L. Sáez & C. Sánchez López (eds.), Las construcciones comparativas, 13-173. Madrid: Visor Libros.
  • Sag, Ivan et. al. 2012. Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar. En H. Boas & I. Sag (eds.), 1-29.
  • Sánchez López, Cristina. 1995. Construcciones concesivas con para. Revista de la Socie-dad Española de Lingüística 25/1: 99-127.
  • Sánchez López, Cristina. 2008. Las correlaciones comparativas de proporcionalidad en español. Boletín de la Real Academia Española 89: 161-192.
  • Sánchez López, Cristina. 2010. Scalarité et corrélation: Syntaxe et sémantique des corréla-tives comparatives en espagnol. En P. Hadermann & O. Inkova (eds.), Approches de la scalarité, 135-168. Ginebra: Droz.
  • Sánchez López, Cristina. 2014. The Left Periphery of Spanish Comparative Correlatives. En A. Dufter & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (eds.). Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish. Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives, 155-183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.214.10san DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.214.10san
  • Sánchez López, Cristina. 2019. ¿Qué demonios…? o las interrogativas malsonantes del español. En M. Cazorla et. al. (eds.), Lo que hablan las palabras. Estudios de lexi-cología, lexicografía y gramática en honor de Manuel Alvar Ezquerra, 515-529. Lugo: Axac.
  • Seuren, Pieter. 2004a. The Importance of Being Modular. Journal of Linguistics 40: 593-635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002786
  • Seuren, Pieter. 2004b. How the Cognitive Revolution passed Linguistics by. En F. Brisard (ed.), Language and Revolution: Language and time, 63-77. Amberes: Universiteit van Antwerpen.
  • Seuren. Pieter. 2009. Language in Cognition. vol. I (Language from within). Oxford: Ox-ford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559473.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559473.001.0001
  • Shlonsky, Ur. 2010. The Cartographic Enterprise in Syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4/6: 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00202.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00202.x
  • Srivastav, Veneeta. 1991. The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9/4: 637-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134752
  • Steels, Luc. 2013. Fluid Construction Grammar. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0009
  • Steels Luc (ed.). 2011. Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11.03ste
  • Steels Luc & De Beule Joachim 2006. A (Very) Brief Introduction to Fluid Construction Grammar. En J. Allen et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language, 73-80. Madison Omnipress Inc. https://doi.org/10.3115/1621459.1621473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/1621459.1621473
  • Steels Luc & Katrien Beuls (eds.). 2019. Case Studies in Fluid Construction Grammar: The Verb Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.106
  • Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Collostructional Analysis. En T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.): 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0016
  • Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Kerstin Fischer (eds.). 2008 Konstruktionsgrammatik II-Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
  • Svenonius, Peter. 2015. Syntactic Constructions. En T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax-Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook, 15-23. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377408.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377408.15
  • Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and Syntax of Motion. En J. P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics. vol. 4, 181-238. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368828_008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368828_008
  • Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, 57-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2018. Constructions. En N. Hornstein et al. (eds.), Syntactic Structures after 60 Years. The Impact of the Chomskyan Revolution, 317-330. Berlín / Nueva York: Mouton-De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501506925-321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501506925-321
  • Verveckken, Katrien & Nicole Delbecque. 2018. Un montón de. Maneras de conceptualizar la cantidad: la persistencia conceptual en los cuantificadores binominales. Bulletin Hispanique 120/1: 123-146. https://doi.org/10.4000/bulletinhispanique.5544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/bulletinhispanique.5544
  • Vigara Tauste, Ana María. 1992. Morfosintaxis del español coloquial. Esbozo estilístico, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Waltereit, Richard. 2017. Argument Structure and Argument Structure Alternations. En A. Dufter & E. Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, pp. 154-182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-004
  • Wasserscheidt, Philipp. 2019. Construction Grammar: Basic Principles and Concepts. Ukrainian Linguistics Journal 49/1: 94-116. Accesible en línea. https://doi.org/10.17721/um/49(2019).94-116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/um/49(2019).94-116
  • Wechsler, Stephen 2020. The Role of the Lexicon in the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Annual Review of Linguistics 6: 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030349
  • Williams, Edwin. 1994. Remarks on Lexical Knowledge. Lingua 92: 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90336-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90336-0
  • Zuloaga, Alberto. 1980. Introducción al estudio de las expresiones fijas. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet