The Metaphors for the Coronavirus Disease in the Speeches of Emmanuel Macron and Pedro Sánchez

  1. Negro Alousque, Isabel 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Çédille: Revista de Estudios Franceses

ISSN: 1699-4949

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 19

Pages: 595-613

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25145/J.CEDILLE.2021.19.24 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Çédille: Revista de Estudios Franceses

Abstract

In the last decades metaphor in specialized discourse has been vastly researched. Following a cognitive approach to metaphor, the present article seeks to analyze the conceptualization of COVID-19 disease in the speeches made by Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Pedro Sánchez, the Spanish prime minister, between March and June 2020. The analysis reveals a network of conceptual metaphors which describe the virus as an animate being or a natural disaster, and action to stop its spread as a war. This metaphorical network has a threefold purpose : (1) to highlight the devastating effects of COVID-19 ; (2) to instil courage and hope ; and (3) to make appeals for union in order to contain the pandemic.

Bibliographic References

  • ALDUY, Cécile (2020) : « Métaphore de Macron sur la guerre : «Cela exonère le pouvoir de ses responsabilités», interviewée par Laure Bretton. Libération, 30 mars. URL: https://www.liberation.fr/politiques/2020/03/30/metaphore-de-macron-sur-la-guerre-cela-exonere-le-pouvoir-de-ses-responsabilites_1783567
  • BEER, Francis A. & Christil DE LANDTSHEER [éds] (2004) : Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing, Michigan State University Press.
  • BRAUMAN, Rony (2018) : Guerres humanitaires ? Mensonges et intox. Paris, Textuel. URL: https://www.mjcroguet.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/106/2020/04/rony-brauman_01.pdf
  • CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan (2004) : Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan (2005) : Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan (2009) : «Metaphor and political communication », in Andreas Musolff & Jörg Zinken (éds), Metaphor and Discourse. New York, Pal-grave, 97-115.
  • CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan (2012) : «Forensic deliberations on purposeful metaphor». Me¬taphor and the Social World, 2: 1, 1-21.
  • CHARTERIS-BLACK, Jonathan (2014) : Analysing Political Speeches. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • CHILTON, Paul (1996) : Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common European Home. Berne/New York, Peter Lang.
  • CHILTON, Paul & Mikhail V. ILYN (1993) : « Metaphor in political discourse: The case of the Common European House ». Discourse and Society, 4: 1, 7-31.
  • CHILTON, Paul & Christina SCHÄFFNER [éds] (2002) : Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
  • CUENCA, Mª. José (2020) : « ¿Cómo es el coronavirus? Metáforas y símiles para una pan-demia ». El Norte de Castilla, 26 avril. URL: https://www.elnortedecastilla.es/sociedad/salud/coronavirus-metaforas-similes-.0200426112054-ntrc.html
  • DE LANDSTHEER, Christil (2009) : « Collecting political meaning from the count of metaphor », in Andreas Musolff & Jörg Zinken (éds), Metaphor and Discourse. New York, Palgrave, 59-78.
  • DE LANDTSHEER, Christil & Ofer FELDMAN (2000) : Beyond Public Speech and Symbols. Explorations in the Rhetoric of Politicians and the Media. Westport, Praeger.
  • DE LANDTSHEER, Christil & Elisabeth KOCH (2005) : « Metaphors and the framing of the European single currency (Euro) in and out of “Euro land” », in R.F. Farnen et al. (éds), Democratization, Europeanization and Globalization Trends. Cross-national Analysis of Authoritarianism, Socialisation, Communication, Youth and So-cial Policy. Frankfurt, Peter Lang, 429-446.
  • FELDMAN, Ofer & Christil DE LANDTSHEER (1998) : Politically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Public Sphere. Westport, Praeger.
  • GRABER, Doris (1993) : « Political communication: Scope, progress, promise », in Ada W. Finifter (éd.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline, vol. II. Washington DC, American Political Science Association, 305-332.
  • JOHNSON, Mark (1987) : The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagina-tion, and Reason. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • KRESS, Gunther & Robert HODGE (1993) : Language as Ideology. London, Routledge.
  • KATZ, Albert (1996) : « On interpreting statements as metaphor or irony: Contextual heuristics and cognitive consequences », in Jeffery S. Mio & Albert Katz (éds), Metaphor: Implications and Applications. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 1-22.
  • KÖVECSES, Zoltán (2002) : Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • LAKOFF, George (1987) : Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • LAKOFF, George (1989) : « Philosophical speculation and cognitive science ». Philosophi-cal Psychology, 2: 1, 55-76.
  • LAKOFF, George (2006) : « The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor », in Dirk Geeraerts (éd), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 185-238.
  • LAKOFF, George & Mark JOHNSON (1980) : Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  • LAKOFF, George & Mark JOHNSON (1999) : Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books.
  • LAKOFF, George. & Mark TURNER (1989) : More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poet-ic Metaphor. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • MUSOLFF, Andreas (1998) : « Metaphors and trains of thought: Spotting journey image-ry in British and German political discourse », in Sue Wright, Linda Hanrais and Jolyon Howorth (éds), Language, Politics, and Society. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, 100-109.
  • MUSOLFF, Andreas (2000) : « Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors? ». Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21: 3, 216-229.
  • MUSOLFF, Andreas (2004) : Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogic Reasoning in De-bates about Europe. New York, Palgrave.
  • REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA (en ligne) : Diccionario de la lengua española. URL : https://dle.rae.es
  • SEMINO, Elena & Michela MASCI (1996) : « Politics is football Metaphor in the discour-se of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy ». Discourse and Society, 7: 2, 243-269.
  • SHARIFIAN, Farzad & Maryam JAMARANI (2013) : « Cultural conceptualisations and translating political discourse », in Ana Rojo & Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (éds), Cognitive Linguistics and Translation. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 339-372.
  • SOCIÉTÉ D’ÉDITIONS LAROUSSE (2021) : Dictionnaire Larousse de français. URL : https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais-monolingue.
  • STEEN, Gerard J., et al. (2010) : A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
  • STRAEHLE, Carolyn, et al. (1999) : « Struggle as metaphor in European Union discourses on unemployment ». Discourse and Society, 10: 1, 67-99.
  • THOMPSON, Seth (1996) : « Politics without metaphor is like a fish without water », in Jeffery S. Mio and Albert Katz (éds), Metaphor: Implications and Applications. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 185-201.
  • VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2006) : « Politics, ideology, and discourse », in Keith BROWN (éd), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford, Elsevier, 728-740.
  • VOYER-LÉGER, Catherine (2020) : « Des métaphores pour mieux comprendre le corona-virus ». C’est fou, Ici Radio Canada, 30 mars. URL : https://ici.radio-canada.ca/premiere/emissions/c-est-fou/segments/chronique/161980/metaphores-coronavirus-covid-19-catherine-voyer-leger
  • WODAK, Ruth (éd) (1989) : Language, Power, and Ideology. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Data source: Dialnet