¿Son las investigadoras de Documentación más interdisciplinarias frente a sus colegas hombres? Un análisis aplicado al profesorado español

  1. Manuel Blázquez Ochando
  2. Michela Montesi
  3. Isabel Villaseñor Rodríguez
Revista:
Investigación bibliotecológica

ISSN: 2448-8321,  0187-358X

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 35

Número: 89

Páginas: 133-149

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22201/IIBI.24488321XE.2021.89.58433 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Investigación bibliotecológica

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Resumen La actividad científica desempeñada por mujeres difiere bajo varios puntos de vista de la de los hombres, tanto en términos de producción como de impacto. En este trabajo, comparamos la actividad científica de 349 profesores y profesoras del área de Biblioteconomía y Documentación (ByD) afiliados con universidades españolas, con base en el análisis de su trayectoria de publicación en revistas vaciadas en Scopus. Se analizan las publicaciones de la muestra atendiendo a tres indicadores de interdisciplinariedad (variedad, equilibrio y disparidad), y midiendo la disparidad a través de métodos de Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural (PNL) y Recuperación de Información (RI). A pesar de no encontrar diferencias importantes en las tres dimensiones, los datos obtenidos apuntan a la posible inadecuación de los índices de citas de reflejar las actividades académica desempeñadas por las mujeres en toda su variedad, así como a la necesidad de comparar la producción de hombres y mujeres con base en el análisis temático de los contenidos producidos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abramo, Giovanni,D’Angelo, Ciriaco,Costa, Flavia Di. (2018). The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification. Scientometrics. 114. 373
  • Abramo, Giovanni,D’Angelo, Ciriaco,Costa, Flavia Di. (2019). Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output. Journal of Informetrics. 13. 564
  • Abramo, Giovanni,D’Angelo, Ciriaco,Murgia, Gianluca. (2013). Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics. 7. 811
  • Abramo, Giovanni,D’Angelo, Ciriaco,Zhang, Lin. (2018). A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list. Journal of Informetrics. 12. 1182
  • Adams, Jonathan,Loach, Tamar,Szomszor, Martin. (2016). Interdisciplinary research: Methodologies for identification and assessment. Digital research reports. Digital Science. London.
  • Araújo, Eduardo B.,Araújo, Nuno A. M.,Moreira, André A.,Herrmann, Hans J.,Andrade, Jose S.. (2017). Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men. PloS one. 12.
  • Barthel, Roland,Seidl, Roman. (2017). Interdisciplinary collaboration between natural and social sciences-Status and trends exemplified in groundwater research. PloS one. 12.
  • Beaudry, Catherine,Larivière, Vincent. (2016). Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Research Policy. 45. 1790
  • Bromham, Lindell,Dinnage, Russell,Hua, Xia. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature. 534. 684
  • Chan, Ho Fai,Torgler, Benno. (2020). Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country. Scientometrics. 125. 2421
  • Dong, Kun,Xu, Haiyun,Luo, Rui,Wei, Ling,Fang, Shu. (2018). An integrated method for interdisciplinary topic identification and prediction: a case study on information science and library science. Scientometrics. 115. 849
  • (2018). European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. She Figures 2018.
  • Ghiasi, Gita,Harsh, Matthew,Schiffauerova, Andrea. (2018). Inequality and collaboration patterns in Canadian nanotechnology: implications for pro-poor and gender-inclusive policy. Scientometrics. 115. 785-815
  • Gomes, Janaína,Dewes, Homero. (2017). Disciplinary dimensions and social relevance in the scientific communications on biofuels. Scientometrics. 110. 1173
  • Gonzales, Leslie D.. (2018). Subverting and minding boundaries: The intellectual work of women. The Journal of Higher Education. 89. 677-701
  • Gunter, Ramona. (2009). The Emergence of Gendered Participation Styles in Science-Related Discussions: Implications for Women’s Place in Science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 15. 53-75
  • Hernández-Martín, Estela,Calle, Fernando,Dueñas, Juan C.,Holgado, Miguel,Gómez-Pérez, Asunción. (2019). Participation of women in doctorate, research, innovation, and management activities at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid: analysis of the decade 2006-2016. Scientometrics. 120. 1059
  • Huang, Ying,Glänzel, Wolfgang,Thijs, Bart,Porter, Alan L.,Zhang, Lin. (2021). The comparison of various similarity measurement approaches on interdisciplinary indicators. 1-24
  • Jacobs, Jerry A.,Frickel, Scott. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual review of Sociology. 35. 43-65
  • Jamali, Hamid R.,Abbasi, Alireza,Bornmann, Lutz. (2020). Research diversification and its relationship with publication counts and impact: A case study based on Australian professors. Journal of Information Science. 46. 131
  • Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia,Glynn, Carroll J.. (2013). The Matilda effect-Role congruity effects on scholarly communication: A citation analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication articles. Communication Research. 40. 3-26
  • Larivière, Vicent,Ni, Chaoqn,Gingras, Yves,Cronin, Blaise,Sugimoto, Cassidy. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature News. 504. 211
  • Larivière, Vicent,Vignola-Gagné, Etienne,Villeneuve, Christian,Gélinas, Pascal,Gingras, Yeves. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics. 87. 483
  • Leahey, Erin. (2006). Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link. Gender & Society. 20. 754
  • Leahey, Erin,Beckman, Christine M.,Stanko, Taryn L.. (2017). Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly. 62. 105
  • Leydesdorff, Loet,Rafols, Ismael. (2011). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations. Journal of Informetrics. 5. 87-100
  • Meng, Yu. (2018). Gender distinctions in patenting: Does nanotechnology make a difference?. Scientometrics. 114. 971
  • Meng, Yu,Shapira, Philip. (2010). Nanotechnology and the challenges of equity, equality and development. Springer. Dordrecht.
  • Montesi, Michela,Rodríguez Villaseñor, Isabel,Bittencourt Dos Santos, Fernando. (2019). Presencia, actividad, visibilidad e interdisciplinariedad del profesorado universitario de Documentación en los medios sociales: una perspectiva de género. Revista Española de Documentación Científica. 42. 246
  • Nielsen, Mathias Wullum. (2017). Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle. Studies in Higher Education. 42. 1033
  • Porter, Alan,Rafols, Ismael. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics. 81. 719
  • Rhoten, Diana,Pfirman, Stephanie. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research policy. 36. 56-75
  • Solomon, Greg E. A.,Carley, Stephen,Porter, Alan L.. (2016). How multidisciplinary are the multidisciplinary journals Science and Nature?. PloS one. 11.
  • Stjernholm Madsen, B.. (2016). Statistics for non-statisticians. 2. Springer. Berlín.
  • Sugimoto, Cassidy R.,Work, Sam,Larivière, Vincent,Haustein, Stefanie. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68. 2037
  • Thelwall, Mike,Nevill, Tamara. (2019). No evidence of citation bias as a determinant of STEM gender disparities in US biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology research. Scientometrics. 121. 1793
  • Van Rijnsoever, Frank J.,Hessels, Laurens K.. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research policy. 40. 463
  • Wang, Jian,Thijs, Bart,Glänzel, Wolfgang. (2015). Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. PloS one. 10.
  • Whittington, Kjersten Bunker. (2018). A tie is a tie? Gender and network positioning in life science inventor collaboration. Research Policy. 47. 511
  • Woolley, Richard,Sánchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel,Turpin, Tim,Marceau, Jane. (2014). Research collaboration in the social sciences: What factors are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration?. Science and Public Policy. 42. 567
  • Zhang, Lin,Rousseau, Ronald,Glänzel, Wolfgang. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67. 1257
  • Zhang, Lin,Sun, Beibei,Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida,Chen, Lixin,Huang, Ying. (2018). Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: on the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists. Scientometrics. 117. 271
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet