La usucapión como forma de adquisición en beneficio de la existencia
- 1 UNED, España
ISSN: 2386-7655
Année de publication: 2022
Número: 15
Pages: 164-177
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Con-textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy
Résumé
This paper reflects on the concept of usucaption in §33of the Metaphysic of Morals. For that reason, conditions and the relationship between sensible and intelligible possession are set into consideration avoiding the mere causal implication. The possibility of use of objects as a condition of freedom could legitimate usucaption, about which Kant also states that is a contradictory concept.
Références bibliographiques
- Bertomeu, M. J. (2004), “De la apropiación privada a la adquisición originaria del suelo”. Un cambio metodológico ‘menor’ con consecuencias políticas revolucionarias”, Isegoría, vol. 30, CSIC, pp. 127-134.
- Brandt, R. (1974), Eigentumstheorien von Grotius bis Kant, Stuttgart, Friedrich Frommann Verlag.
- Gregor, M. (1988), “Kant’s Theory of Property”, Review of Metaphysics, vol. 41, n. 4, Philosophy Education Society, pp. 757-787.
- Kant, I. (1999), Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres, traducción de José Mardomingo, Barcelona, Ariel.
- Kant, I. (2005), Metafísica de las Costumbres, traducción de Adela Cortina Orts y Jesús Conill Sancho, Madrid, Tecnos.
- Krasnoff, L. (2018), “On the (Supposed) Distinction Between Classical and Welfare Liberalism: Lessons from the Doctrine of Right”, en Krasnoff, L., N. Sánchez Madrid, y P. Satne, (eds.), Kant’s Doctrine of Right in Twenty-first Century, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp. 101-121.
- Marey, M. (2018), “The Original of Kant’s Social Contract Theory”, en Krasnoff, L., N. Sánchez Madrid, y P. Satne (eds.), Kant’s Doctrine of Right in Twenty-first Century, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp. 9-28.
- Morales Moreno, A. M. (2000), “La usucapión”, Revista Jurídica, vol. 3, Universidad Autónoma De Madrid, pp. 175-204.
- Moya, E., (2019), “Fuerzas, facultades y formas a priori en Kant”, Con-Textos Kantianos, International Journal of Philosophy, (9), junio 2019, pp. 49-71.
- O’Neill, O. (2015), Constructing Authorities. Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.
- Pinheiro Walla, A. (2018), “Posesión común de la tierra y derecho cosmopolita”, traducción de Macarena Marey, Las Torres de Lucca, vol. 7, n. 13, pp. 255-276.
- Pinheiro Walla, A. (2018), “Private property and the Possibility of Consent: Kant and the Social Contract Theory, en Krasnoff, L., N. Sánchez Madrid, y P. Satne (eds.), Kant’s Doctrine of Right in Twenty-first Century, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp. 29-45.
- Sánchez Madrid, N. (2018), “Kant on Poverty and Welfare: Social Demands and Juridical Goals in kant’s Doctrine of Right”, en Krasnoff, L., N. Sánchez Madrid, y P. Satne (eds.), Kant’s Doctrine of Right in Twenty-first Century, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp. 85-100.
- Tomassini, F. (2015), “El concepto de posesión común originaria en la doctrina kantiana de la propiedad”, Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, vol. 32, n. 2, pp: 435-449.
- Westphal, K. (1997), “Do Kant's Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?” Jahrbuch Für Recht Und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 5, 141-194. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43593592
- Williams, H. (1977), “Kant’s Concept of Property”, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 27, n. 106, (1977), pp. 32-40.
- Waldron, J., “The Principle of Proximity”, New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 255 (2011), p. 19.