Efectos primarios y secundarios del origen social en la transición a la educación posobligatoria en España

  1. Manuel T. Valdés 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

ISSN: 0210-5233

Any de publicació: 2020

Número: 171

Pàgines: 125-144

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5477/CIS/REIS.171.125 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

Resum

The inequality observed in educational decision-making may be broken down into the effect of social origin on academic performance (primary effect) and the educational decision-making process itself (secondary effect). Prior studies on enrollment decisions regarding post-secondary education in Spain have suggested that the relative importance of secondary effects may reach three-quarters of all inequality. However, the performance measure used may have led to an overestimation of these secondary effects. This work examines the potential overestimation using the Survey of Social Classes and Social Structure and the PISA study. It concludes that, while secondary effects explain a significant part of the inequality observed in the transition to post-compulsory education, they do not account for three-quarters of said inequality.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Bernardi, Fabrizio y Cebolla, Héctor (2014). «Clase social de origen y rendimiento escolar como predictores de las trayectorias educativas/Social Class and School Performance as Predictors of Educational Paths in Spain». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 146: 3-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.146.3
  • Bernardi, Fabrizio y Requena, Miguel (2010). «Desigualdad y puntos de inflexión educativos: el caso de la educación post-obligatoria en España». Revista de Educación, número extraordinario: 93-118.
  • Boudon, Raymond (1974). Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. New York: Wiley.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre y Passeron, Jean Claude (1998). La Reproducción: elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. México, D.F.: Fontamara.
  • Breen, Richard y Goldthorpe, John H. (1997). «Explaining education differentials: towards a formal rational action theory». Rationality and Society, 9(3): 275-305. doi: 10.1177/104346397009003002
  • Breen, Richard y Jonsson, Jan O. (2005). «Inequality of Opportunity in Comparative Perspective: Recent Research on Educational Attainment and Social Mobility». Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 223- 243. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122232
  • Büchner, Charlotte y Velden, Rolf van der (2013). «How Social Background Affects Educational Attainment over Time in the Netherlands». En: Jackson, Michelle (ed.). Determined to Succeed? Performance vs Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Cebolla, Héctor y Martínez de Lizarrondo, Antidio (2015). «Las expectativas educativas de la población inmigrante en Navarra. ¿Optimismo inmigrante o efectos de escuela?». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 73(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3989/ ris.2013.02.22
  • Contini, Dalit y Scagni, Andrea (2013). «Social-Origin Inequalities in Educational Careers in Italy». En: Jackson, Michelle (ed.). Determined to Succeed? Performance vs Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Daza Pérez, Lidia; Troiano, Helena y Elias Andreu, Marina (2019). «La transición a la universidad desde el bachillerato y desde el CFGS. La importancia de los factores socioeconómicos». Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 1(1): 1-21. doi: 10.5565/rev/papers.2546
  • Dollmann, Jörg (2016). «Less Choice, Less Inequality? A Natural Experiment on Social and Ethnic Differences in Educational Decision-Making». European Sociological Review, 32(2): 203-215. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/ jcv082
  • Elias Andreu, Marina y Daza Pérez, Lidia (2017). «¿Cómo deciden los jóvenes la transición a la educación posobligatoria? Diferencias entre centros públicos y privados-concertados». Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 10(1): 5-22. doi: 10.7203/ RASE.10.1.9135
  • Erikson, Robert y Jonsson, Jan O. (1996). Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Erikson, Robert; Goldthorpe, John H.; Jackson, Michelle; Yaish, Meir y Cox, D. R. (2005). «On Class Differentials in Educational Attainment». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(27): 9730-9733. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0502433102
  • Erikson, Robert y Rudolphi, Frida (2010). «Change in Social Selection to Upper Secondary School - Primary and Secondary Effects in Sweden». European Sociological Review, 26(3): 291-305. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp022
  • Gambetta, Diego (1987). Were they pushed or did they jump? Individual decision mechanisms in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holm, Anders y Jaeger, Mads Meier (2013). «Dentist, Driver, or Dropout? Family Background and Secondary Education Choices in Denmark». En: Jackson, M. (ed.). Determined to Succeed? Performance vs Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Ichou, Mathieu y Vallet, Louis André (2013). «Academic Achievement, Tracking Decisions, and Their Relative Contribution to Educational Inequalities: Change over Four Decades in France». En: Jackson, M. (ed.). Determined to Succeed? Performance vs Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Jackson, Michelle (ed.) (2013). Determined to succeed? Performance vs choice in educational attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Jackson, Michelle; Erikson, Robert; Goldthorpe, John H. y Yaish, Meir (2007). «Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-Level Courses in England and Wales». Acta Sociologica, 50(3): 211-29. doi: 10.1177/0001699307080926
  • Jackson, Michelle y Jonsson, Jan O. (2013). «Why Does Inequality of Educational Opportunity Vary across Countries?». En: Jackson, M. (ed.). Determined to Succeed? Performance vs Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Jerrim, John; Chmielewski, Anna K. y Parker, Phil (2015). «Socioeconomic Inequality in Access to High-Status Colleges: A Cross-Country Comparison». Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42: 20-32. doi: 10.1016/j. rssm.2015.06.003
  • Kloosterman, Rianne; Ruiter, Stijn; De Graaf, Paul M y Kraaykamp, Gerbert (2009). «Parental Education, Childrenís Performance and the Transition to Higher Secondary Education: Trends in Primary and Secondary Effects over Five Dutch School Cohorts (1965-99)». The British Journal of Sociology, 60(2): 377-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 4446.2009.01235.x
  • Lucas, Samuel R. (2001). «Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects». American Journal of Sociology, 106(6): 1642-1690. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1086/321300
  • Mare, Robert D. (1980). «Social Background and School Continuation Decisions». Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(370): 295- 305. doi: 10.2307/2287448
  • Mare, Robert D. (1981). «Change and Stability in Educational Stratification». American Sociological Review, 46(1): 72-87.
  • Martínez García, José Saturnino (2007). «Clase social, género y desigualdad de oportunidades educativas». Revista de Educación, 342: 287-306.
  • Martínez García, José Saturnino (2008). «Clase social, tipo de familia y logro educativo en Canarias». Papers. Revista de Sociología, 87: 77-100. doi: 10.5565/rev/papers/v87n0.790
  • Martínez García, José Saturnino (2011). «Género y origen social: diferencias grandes en fracaso escolar administrativo y bajas en rendimiento educativo». Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 4(3): 270-85.
  • Martínez García, José Saturnino (2014). «Clase obrera, género y éxito educativo: inteligencia, expectativas y didáctica». Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 7(2): 449-467.
  • Morgan, Stephen L. (2012). «Models of College Entry in the United States and the Challenges of Estimating Primary and Secondary Effects». Sociological Methods y Research, 41(1): 17-56. doi: 10.1177/0049124112440797
  • Neugebauer, Martin y Schindler, Steffen (2012). «Early Transitions and Tertiary Enrolment: The Cumulative Impact of Primary and Secondary Effects on Entering University in Germany». Acta Sociologica, 55(1): 19-36. doi: 10.1177/0001699311427747.
  • Neugebauer, Martin; Reimer, David; Schindler, Steffen y Stocké, Volker (2013). «Inequality in Transitions to Secondary School and Tertiary Education in Germany». En: Jackson, M. (ed.). Determined to Succeed? Performance vs Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Tarabini, Aina y Curran, Marta (2015). «El efecto de la clase social en las decisiones educativas: un análisis de las oportunidades, creencias y deseos educativos de los jóvenes». Revista de Investigación en Educación, 13(1): 7-26.
  • Willis, Paul (1981). Learning to labor. How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet