El papel del conocimiento en la agencia docenteun modelo teórico de comprensión

  1. Verástegui Martínez, Macarena 1
  2. Úbeda, Jorge 2
  1. 1 Fundación Promaestro y Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  2. 2 Fundación Promaestro y Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Revista:
Teoría de la educación

ISSN: 1130-3743

Any de publicació: 2022

Títol de l'exemplar: La Universidad en problemas

Volum: 34

Número: 2

Pàgines: 237-255

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.14201/TERI.26953 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Teoría de la educación

Resum

Teacher Knowledge is a relevant subject matter for educational research since there is evidence about the impact of teachers in the effectiveness and improvement of educational systems. However, mainly researches have a biased and incomplete approach about it, because they offer fewer operative methods of investigation or that distort the concept that is studied. To overcome these constraints and to study in a operational way teacher educational knowledge is necessary to draw from a teacher agency approach, which lead us to understand clearly what is professional practice. The aim of this paper is to offer a theoretical and methodological model which links teacher agency with educational knowledge that teacher can produce. For that we have done a critical-reflective work about the reference material and the research concepts, and we have drawn from two understanding models: Pedagogical Content Knowledge Summit model (Helms, & Stoke, 2013) about Pedagogical Content Knowledge and ecological model of Priestley et al. (2015) about teacher agency. As results, we offer a model that links the concepts of teacher agency and teacher knowledge, and it expands the teacher knowledge understanding because it incorporates two dimensions about it: (1) knowledge that teacher incorporates and get and (2) knowledge that teacher produces ad intra and ad extra of profession. Our prospect of this model is to observe if it is useful for studying knowledge that teachers create through reflective and collaborative practices in an operational way and to locate the inherited classic gap between theory and praxis in a more constructive place.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What works” won´t work: evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
  • Biesta, G., Filippakou, O., Wainwright, E., & Aldridge, D. (2019). Why educational research should not just solve problems, but should cause them as well. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), pp 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3509
  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143
  • Burgess, S., Shenila, R., & Taylor, E. (2019). Teacher peer observation and student test scores: Evidence from a field experiment in English secondary schools. EdWorkingPaper, 19-139. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai19-139
  • Contreras, J., y Pérez de Lara, N. (2010). La experiencia y la investigación educativa. En J. Contreras y N. Pérez de Lara (Coords.), Investigar la experiencia educativa (pp. 21-86). Morata.
  • Croll, P. (1995). La observación sistemática en el aula. Muralla.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Prometheus Books.
  • Domingo, A. (2020). Profesorado reflexivo e investigador. Propuestas y experiencias formativas. Narcea.
  • Fernández, C. (2014). Knowledge base for teaching and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): some useful models and implications for teacher´s training. Problems of Education in the 21st century, 60, 79- 100. https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/vol60/79-100.Fernandez_Vol.60.pdf
  • Firestone, W. & Donaldson, M. (2019). Teacher evaluation as data use: what recent research suggests. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31, 289-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09300-z
  • González, A. (1997). Estructuras de la praxis. Ensayo de una filosofía primera. Fundación Xavier Zubiri.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., & Mockler, N. (2016). Praxis and the language of improvement: inquiry- based approaches to authentic improvement in Australasian schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.975137
  • Helms, J., & Stokes, L. (2013). A meeting of minds around Pedagogical Content Knowledge: designing an international PCK summit for professional, community and field development. Inverness Research- PCK Summit Report. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286265312
  • Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790600975593
  • Killion, J., & Todnem, G. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14-16. https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199103_killion.pdf
  • Leijen, A., Pedaste, M., & Lepp, L. (2020). Teacher agency following the ecological model: how it is achieved and how it could be strengthened by different types of reflection. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1672855
  • Malpica, F. (2013). Calidad de la práctica educativa. Referentes, indicadores y condiciones para mejorar la enseñanza-aprendizaje (4ªed). Graó.
  • Medina, J. L. (2006). La profesión docente y la construcción del conocimiento profesional. Lumen.
  • Medina, J. L., y Pérez, M. J. (2017). La construcción del conocimiento en el proceso de aprender a ser profesor: la visión de los protagonistas. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 21(1), 17- 38. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56750681002.pdf
  • Moreno, J. M. (2018). Profesorado: más que una profesión. Cuadernos de pedagogía. Especial profesión docente, 489, 12-17.
  • Moya, J., y Luengo, F. (2019). Capacidad profesional docente. Buscando la escuela de nuestro tiempo. Anaya.
  • Murillo, J., Perines, H., y Lomba, L. (2017). La comunicación de la investigación educativa. Una aproximación a la relación entre la investigación, su difusión y la práctica docente. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 21(3), 183-200. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/59794
  • Perines, H. (2018). ¿Por qué la investigación educativa no impacta en la práctica docente? Estudios sobre educación, 34, 9-27. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.34.9-27
  • Poulou, M., Reddy, L., & Dudek, C. (2019). Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: a preliminary investigation. School Psychology International, 40(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318798045
  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency. An ecological Approach. Bloomsbury.
  • Priestley, M., & Drew, V. (2019). Professional Enquiry: an ecological approach to developing teacher agency. In D. Godfrey & C. Brown (Eds.), An eco-system for research-engaged schools. Reforming education through research (pp. 154-170). Routledge. https://hdl.handle.net/1893/28253
  • Reis- Jorge, J., Ferreira, M., y Olcina-Sempere, G. (2020). La figura del profesorado-investigador en la reconstrucción de la profesionalidad docente en un mundo en transformación. Revista Educación, 44(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.39044
  • Roth, K., Wilson. C., Taylor, J. Stuhlsatz, M., & Hvidsten, C. (2019). Comparing the Effects of Analysis-of-Practice and Content-Based Professional Development on Teacher and Student Outcomes in Science. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1217-1253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218814759
  • Rupérez, F. L. (2014). Fortalecer la profesión docente. Un desafío crucial. Narcea.
  • Schön, D. A. (1984). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Spencer, D. (2014). Was moses peer observed? The ten commandments of peer observation of teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education. International Perspectives (pp. 183-200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5
  • Thoilliez, B. (2013). Implicaciones pedagógicas del pragmatismo filosófico americano. Una reconsideración de las aportaciones educativas de Charles S. Peirce, William James y John Dewey. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. https://hdl.handle.net/10486/13475
  • Úbeda, J. (2018). Del cambio educativo a las mejoras educativas: el protagonismo del conocimiento educativo de los docentes. Cuadernos de pedagogía, 487(3), 76-81.
  • Verástegui, M. (2019). El conocimiento educativo de los docentes en la transformación y la mejora educativa. En H. Monarca, J. M. Gorostiaga, & Fco. J. Pericacho (Coords.), Calidad de la educación: aportes de la investigación y la práctica (pp. 171-192). Dykinson. https://hdl.handle.net/10486/686710
  • Villar Angulo, L. M. (Coord.). (1995). Un ciclo de enseñanza reflexiva. Estrategia para el diseño curricular. Ediciones Mensajero.
  • Viñao, A. (2018). La desprofesionalización de la docencia: viejas cuestiones, nuevas amenazas. Revista digital de educación del FEAE-Aragón, 23, 8-11. https://feae.eu/revista-forum-aragon-numero-23/
  • Willinghan, D., & Daniel, D. (2021). Making Education Research Relevant. How research can give teachers more choices. Education Next, 21(2). https://www.educationnext.org/making-education-research-relevant-how-researchers-can-give-teachers-more-choices/
  • Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective Teaching: An Introduction. Lawrence Erlbaurm
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet