Los programas de recuperación en la intervención de los trastornos por abusos de sustancias: buenas prácticas europeas

  1. Antonio Molina Fernández
  2. Jesús Saiz Galdós
  3. María Luisa Cuenca Montesino
  4. Francisco Gil Rodríguez
  5. Banesa Mena García
  6. Gisela Hansen Rodríguez
Revista:
Revista española de drogodependencias

ISSN: 0213-7615

Any de publicació: 2022

Títol de l'exemplar: Monográfico: Hacia un nuevo paradigma en adicciones

Número: 47

Pàgines: 33-46

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Altres publicacions en: Revista española de drogodependencias

Resum

Introduction: addictive behaviours recovery-oriented programmes have advanced from traditional therapeutic communities to actual interventions integrated in social and health networks and developed by multidisciplinary professional staff. This evolution has not been systematic until XXIst century, with the beginning of “Science of Recovery”. Aims: to analyse the development of recovery programmes, especially the theoretical models and good practices actually in development into European programmes. Development of the topic: they have been analysed four theoretical models and two good practices about recovery, from a scientific perspective and experiences previously documented. Conclusions: the “Science of Recovery” is advancing to validated, replicable and measurable models and programmes. It´s still necessary to adapt recoveryoriented programmes to needs and particularities of people under treatment and specific groups

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Asociación Proyecto Hombre. (2015). El Modelo Biopsicosocial En Proyecto Hombre. APH: Madrid.
  • Aujoulat, I., D’Hoore, W. y Deccache, A. (2007). Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pec.2006.09.008
  • Barzanti, M., Blixt, C., Carrena, S., DiRenzo, M., Franzen, A. y Molina, A. (2017). Triple R Handbook on social reintegration of recovered drug users. Rimini: EU/San Patrignano.
  • Barzanti, M., Blixt, C., Carrena, S., DiRenzo, M., Franzen, A. y Molina, A. (2017). Triple R Manual on rehabilitation and recovery of drug users. Rimini: EU/San Patrignano.
  • Becoña, E. y Cortes, M. (2010). La familia como agente de salud. Guía clínica de intervención psicológica en adicciones. Terapias centradas en la familia. Madrid: Instituto Internacional de Estudios sobre la Familia.
  • Best, D. (2012). Addiction Recovery: A movement for personal change and social growth in the UK. Pavilion: Brighton.
  • Best, D. y Aston, E. (2015). Long term recovery from addiction: criminal justice involvement and positive criminology? En N. Ronel y D. Segev (eds.), Positive criminology. Routledge frontiers of criminal justice (pp. 177-193). Routledge.
  • Best,D., Bliuc, A.M., Iqbal, M., Upton, K. y Hodgkins, S. (2017). Mapping social identity change in online networks of addiction recovery. Addiction Research & Theory 26(3).
  • Best, D., Vanderplasschen, W., y Nisic, M. (2020). Measuring capital in active addiction and recovery: the development of the strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS). Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 15(40).
  • Bird, C.E. y Rieker, P.P. (2008). Gender and Health: The Effect of Constrained Choices and Social Policies. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bumbarger, B. y Campbell, E (2012). A state agency-university partnership for translational research and the dissemination of evidence-based prevention and intervention. Administration and Policy Mental Health, 39(4), 268-77. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10488-011-0372-x
  • Cañas, J.L. (2003). Psicoterapia y rehumanización. Madrid: Ed. Dykinson.
  • Carballo, J. L., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Secades-Villa, R., Sobell, L. C., Dum, M. y García-Rodríguez, O. (2007). Determinantes de la recuperación de los problemas de alcohol en sujetos tratados y no tratados en una muestra española. En H. Klingemann, y L.C. Sobell (eds.), Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: A methodological review of the literature from 1999 through 2005. New York: Springer.
  • Covington, S. (2008). Women and addiction: a trauma-informed approach. J Psychoactive Drugs., 40(Suppl 5), 377- 385. https://doi.org/10.1080/027910 72.2008.10400665
  • Creswell, J.W. (2014). Chapter One: The selection of a research approach. En J.W. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (pp.3-23). SAGE.
  • Deacon, B. J. (2013). The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(7), 846-861.
  • European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2017). Health and social responses to drug-related problems: a European guide. Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 536980. Retrieved from https://www.emcdda. europa.eu/responses-guide
  • Granfield, R. y Cloud, W. (2001). Social context and natural recovery: The role of social capital in the resolution of drugassociated problems. Substance Use & Misuse, 36(11),1543–1570.
  • Groshkova, T. y Best, D. (2011). The evolution of a UK evidence base for substance misuse recovery. Journal of Groups in Addiction and Recovery, 6, 20-37.
  • Groshkova, T., Best, D. y White, W. (2012). The Assessment of Recovery Capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32(2): 187-94.
  • Johnstone, L. y Boyle, M. (2018). The Power Threat Meaning Framework: Overview. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
  • Klingemann, H. y Sobell, L.C. (2007). Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: A methodological review of the literature from 1999 through 2005. New York: Springer.
  • Kulesza, M., Matsuda, M., Ramirez, J. J., Werntz, A. J., Teachman, B. A. y Lindgren, K. P. (2016). Towards greater understanding of addiction stigma: Intersectionality with race/ethnicity and gender. Drug and alcohol dependence, 169, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.020
  • Laespada, T. e Iraurgi, I. (2009). Reducción de daños: lo aprendido de la heroína. Deusto: Ed. Universidad de Deusto.
  • Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J. y Slade, M. (2011). Conceptual Framework for Personal Recovery in Mental Health: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 445-452.
  • MacGregor, S. (2012). Addiction recovery: A movement for social change and personal growth in the UK, by David Best, Brighton. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19, 351–352. https://doi.or g/10.3109/09687637.2012.692594
  • Molina, A., Saiz, J., Gil, F. y Cuenca, M. L. (2021). Models of recovery: influence of psychosocial factors on substance use recovery. International Journal of Substance Use, https://doi.org/10.108 0/14659891.2021.1941348
  • Molina, A., Saiz, J., Gil, F., Cuenca, M. L. y Goldsby, T. (2020). Psychosocial Intervention in European Addictive Behaviour Recovery Programmes: A Qualitative Study. Healthcare, 8(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030268
  • Molina Fernandez, A.J., Gil Rodríguez, F. y Cuenca Montesinos, M.L. (2020). Recovery, Rehabilitation Drug treatment and Reintegration in the Community Programs: Good Practices Transfer into European Countries. Prac Clin Invest, 2(2), 45-55.
  • Molina Fernández, A.J., Gil Rodríguez, F., y Cuenca Montesinos, M. L. (2018). Can Neuroscience be a Faustian bargain? Psychosocial factors in recovery of addictive behaviours. International Journal of Psychology and Neuroscience, 4(2), 67-75.
  • Molina Fernández, A.J., González Riera, J., Montero Bancalero, F. y Gómez Salgado, J. (2015). La complejidad de la coordinación social y sanitaria en las adicciones y el papel de la enfermera. Enfermería Clínica, 26(1), 68-75. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2015.09.009
  • Moos, R. H. y Finney, J. W. (2011). Commentary on Lopez-Quintero et al. (2011): Remission and relapse. The YinYang of addictive disorders. Addiction, 106(3), 670-671.
  • O’Brien, J. (2003). La planificación centrada en la persona como factor de contribución en el cambio organizacional y social. Siglo Cero, 34(208), 65-69.
  • O’Brien, C .L.. y O’Brien, J. (2000). The origins of person centered planning: a Community of Practice Perspective. Responsive Systems Associates, Lithonia, GA. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED456599
  • Saiz, J. (2008). El estigma de la cocaína. Revista Española de Sociología, 10, 95-111.
  • Stevens, E., Jason, L. A., Ram, D. y Light, J. (2015). Investigating Social Support and Network Relationships in Substance Use Disorder Recovery. Substance Abuse, 36(4), 396–399. https://doi.org/10 .1080/08897077.2014.965870
  • Tiburcio, N. y Kressel, D. (2011). An Enhanced Understanding of Therapeutic Communities Worldwide. Revista Adicción y Ciencia, 1(4).
  • Uchino, B. (2004). Social Support and Physical Health: Understanding the Health Consequences of Relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Vanderplasschen, W., Vandevelde, S. y Broekaert, E. (2014). Therapeutic Communities for Addictions in Europe. Available Evidence, Current Practices and Future Challenges for Recovery Oriented Treatment in Therapeutic Communities for Drug Addicts (EMCDDA Insights Publication), EuropeanMonitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Lisbon, Portugal.
  • White, W. y Cloud, W. (2008). Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counselor, 9(5), 22-27.
  • Yates, R. (2010). Tackling addiction: Pathways to recovery. London: Jessica Kingsley Pub.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet