Spanish Validation of the Assessment of Recovery Capital Scale in Clinical Population with Alcohol Use Disorder

  1. Ana Sión 1
  2. Rosa Jurado-Barba 1
  3. Laura Esteban-Rodríguez 1
  4. Francisco Arias 1
  5. Gabriel Rubio 1
  6. InRecovery Group 1
  1. 1 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
    info

    Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00qyh5r35

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 25

Páginas: 1-13

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2022.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

Recovery from alcohol use disorder involves achieving certain resources for positive lifestyle changes, well-being, and long-term abstinence. The present study aims to translate and validate the Assessment Capital Recovery (ARC) in a Spanish clinical sample of individuals with alcohol use disorder, in abstinence. The participants were 184 patients who attended outpatient treatments. They were evaluated with the adapted version of the ARC (Spanish abbreviation: “Valoración del Capital de Recuperación, VCR”) and by WHOQOL-BREF (quality of life scale), in one session. Statistical analysis included the calculation of reliability, convergent validity (relationship with WHOQOL-BREF), specificity and sensitivity, as well as validity based on internal structure (confirmatory factor analysis). VCR scores show appropriate values for reliability (α = .90), and a low convergent validity with WHOQOL-BREF (Rho = .33–.53). The VCR appears to distinguish between patients with early and stable sobriety (χ2 = 20.55, p < .01). The ROC curve indicates significant discrimination values (p < .05) for stable recovery (5 years of abstinence) and sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 71.2%. Further, confirmatory factor analysis suggests the presence of a single factor, with relatively acceptable values of goodness of fit and factor loadings. We used ULS parameter estimation to study VCR properties, an appropriate tool for assessing recovery in clinical populations of individuals with alcohol use disorder in abstinence.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arndt, S., Sahker, E., & Hedden, S. (2017). Does the Assessment of Recovery Capital Scale reflect a single or multiple domains? Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 8, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S138148
  • Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides, G. A. & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Psychology Press.
  • Basu, A., Mattoo, S., Basu, D., Subodh, B., Sharma, S., & Roub, F. E. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Hindi-translated version of the “Assessment of Recovery Capital” Scale at a tertiary level de-addiction center in North India. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 35(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_107_18
  • Benítez-Borrego, S., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Urzúa-Morales, A. (2014). Factorial structural analysis of the Spanish version of WHOQOL-BREF: An exploratory structural equation model study. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2205–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0663-2
  • Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Best, D., Beckwith, M., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Mawson, E., & Lubman, D. I. (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research and Theory, 24, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980
  • Best, D., Gow, J., Knox, T., Taylor, A., Groshkova, T., & White, W. (2012). Mapping the recovery stories of drinkers and drug users in Glasgow: Quality of life and its associations with measures of recovery capital. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31(3), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00321.x
  • Best, D., Lubman, D. I., Savic, M., Wilson, A., Dingle, G., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Social and transitional identity: Exploring social networks and their significance in a therapeutic community setting. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 35(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-04-2013-0007
  • Best, D., McKitterick, T., Beswick, T., & Savic, M. (2015). Recovery capital and social networks among people in treatment and among those in recovery in York, England. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(3), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2015.1050931
  • Best, D. W., Haslam, C., Staiger, P., Dingle, G., Savic, M., Bathish, R., Mackenzie, J., Beckwith, M., & Lubman, D. I. (2016). Social networks and recovery (SONAR): Characteristics of a longitudinal outcome study in five therapeutic communities in Australia. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 37(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-04-2016-0012
  • Bollen, K. A. (1987). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett’s nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294061
  • Bowen, E. A., Scott, C. F., Irish, A., & Nochajski, T. H. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) instrument in a diverse low-income sample. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1657148
  • Brown, A. M., Ashford, R. D., Figley, N., Courson, K., Curtis, B., & Kimball, T. (2019). Alumni characteristics of collegiate recovery programs: A national survey. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 37(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2018.1437374
  • Burns, J., & Marks, D. (2013). Can recovery capital predict addiction problem severity? Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 31(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2013.800430
  • Cano, I., Best, D., Edwards, M., & Lehman, J. (2017). Recovery capital pathways: Modelling the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.002
  • Chen, G., & Gueta, K. (2020). Sense of coherence as a recovery capital in recovery from substance use disorders. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 38(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2020.1794494
  • Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis (3rd Ed.). Continuum International.
  • Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 1971–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802289762
  • De Soto, C. B., O’Donnell, W. E., & De Soto, J. L. (1989). Long-term recovery in alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 13(5), 693–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1989.tb00406.x
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología [Factor analysis as a technique in psychological research]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 18–33.
  • Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment (1st Ed.). New York University Press
  • Groshkova, T., Best, D., & White, W. (2013). The Assessment of Recovery Capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.x
  • The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667
  • Hennessy, E. A. (2017). Recovery capital: A systematic review of the literature. Addiction Research and Theory, 25, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1297990
  • Honess, P., Andrianjazalahatra, T., Fernandez, L., & Griffiths, M. A. (2012). Environmental enrichment and the behavioural needs of macaques housed in large social groups. ViewPoints, 10.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. L. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. SPSS.
  • Kaskutas, L. A., Borkman, T. J., Laudet, A., Ritter, L. A., Witbrodt, J., Subbaraman, M. S., Stunz, A., & Bond, J. (2014). Elements that define recovery: The experiential perspective. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75(6), 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2014.75.999
  • Kaskutas, L. A., Witbrodt, J., & Grella, C. E. (2015). Recovery definitions: Do they change? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 154, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.021
  • Kelly, J. F., & Hoeppner, B. (2015). A biaxial formulation of the recovery construct. Addiction Research & Theory, 23, 5–9. http://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.930132
  • Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. Methuen.
  • Kline, R. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Compton, D. L. (Eds.), Applied quantitative analysis in the social sciences (pp. 171–207). Routledge.
  • Laudet, A. B. (2008). The road to recovery: Where are we going and how do we get there? Empirically driven conclusions and future directions for service development and research. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 2001–2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802293459
  • Laudet, A. B., Becker, J. B., & White, W, L. (2009). Don’t wanna go through that madness no more: Quality of life satisfaction as predictor of sustained remission from illicit drug misuse. Substance Use & Misuse, 44(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802714462
  • Laudet, A. B., & White, W. L. (2008). Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080701681473
  • Lee, C.-T., Zhang, G., & Edwards, M. C. (2012). Ordinary least squares estimation of parameters in exploratory factor analysis with ordinal data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.658340
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2012). TETRA-COM: A comprehensive SPSS program for estimating the tetrachoric correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1191–1196. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0200-6
  • Mawson, E., Best, D., Beckwith, M., Dingle, G. A., & Lubman, D. I. (2015). Social identity, social networks and recovery capital in emerging adulthood: A pilot study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 10(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0041-2
  • Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
  • Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
  • Nasser, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258228
  • Observatorio Español de las Drogas y las Adicciones. (2019). Informe 2019 Alcohol, tabaco y drogas ilegales en España [2019 Report. Alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs in Spain]. Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social, y Secretaría de Estado de Servicios Sociales. https://pnsd.sanidad.gob.es/ca/profesionales/sistemasInformacion/informesEstadisticas/pdf/2019_Informe_Resumen_ejecutivo.pdf
  • Rettie, H. C., Hogan, L. M., & Cox, W. M. (2019). The Recovery Strengths Questionnaire for alcohol and drug use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Review, 38(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12870
  • Sánchez, J., Sahker, E., & Arndt, S. (2020). The Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) Scale predicts substance abuse treatment completion. Addictive Behaviors, 102, Article 106189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106189
  • Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1428–1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000623
  • Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial a report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00
  • Slade, M., Leamy, M., Bacon, F., Janosik, M., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Bird, V. (2012). International differences in understanding recovery: Systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 21(4), 353–364. http://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796012000133
  • Sobell, L. C., Ellingstad, T. P., & Sobell, M. B. (2000). Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: Methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions. Addiction, 95(5), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95574911.x
  • Sterling, R., Slusher, C., & Weinstein, S. (2008). Measuring recovery capital and determining its relationship to outcome in an alcohol dependent sample. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 34(5), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990802308114
  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1989). A general coefficient of determination for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb00912.x
  • UK Drug Policy Comission. (2008). The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group [Policy report]. The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group. https://www.ukdpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Policy%20report%20-%20A%20vision%20of%20recovery_%20UKDPC%20recovery%20consensus%20group.pdf
  • World Health Organization. (1998). WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol
  • World Health Organization. (1996). WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. https://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet